Search RPD Archives
[rpd] AFRINIC (Staff?) Active Support Onlist (was: impact analysis for policies)
Sylvain BAYA
abscoco at gmail.com
Wed Jun 26 10:03:55 UTC 2019
{Initial mail of the previous thread :
<https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2019/009531.html>}
Hi all,
I have decided to resend this mail
<https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2019/009561.html>, amongst
other, to have it in a separate thread. Apologize, i failed, twice, to
do it fairly :'-(
This message is a call for more active support from AFRINIC Staff,
during the discussions on the RPD list ; in line with the PDP (Policy
Development Process) as provisioned by the CPM at section 3.4.0.
Please see below for details (comments seeked and welcome)...
Le 6/22/2019 à 10:10 AM, Sylvain BAYA a écrit :
> [...]
>
> But i was just trying to, silently, recall the process as provisioned
> by the CPM section 3.4.1.
>
> CPM section 3.4.1 : «[...]The Working Group Chair(s) may request
> AFRINIC to provide an analysis (technical, financial, legal or other),
> of the impact of the draft policy proposal.[...]»
>
> ...i think we must follow our rules or change them if they appear to
> be broken somewhere. Right ?
>
> [...]
>>
>> Precisely, most of the newer versions, at least in the case of my
>> proposals, where to address the points raised in the impact analysis.
>> So, it should be easy to get the previous impact analysis, compare
>> the differences of the old and new versions of the policy proposal,
>> against the impact analysis, and raise if something is missing.
>>
>
> :-) i'm sure that at least one of them (policy liaison?) might be
> reading...
>
> Do you think we should also (policily speaking) ask one of them (say
> the same staff member i mentioned above) to follow|read the
> discussions and react when we need|seek their expertise ? :-D
>
I'm calling AFRINIC (Staff?) to timely react onlist when requested
during the discussions as stipulated by the CPM, at section 3.4.0.
CPM section 3.4.0 : «[...] AFRINIC shall also provide relevant facts and
statistics if requested during the discussion. [...]»
Please we need|seek your proactive|reactive presence, onlist, because
your continuous *support* is part of a successful process.
Shalom,
--sb.
> [...]
--
Regards,
Sylvain B.
<http://www.chretiennement.org>
__
Website : <https://www.cmnog.cm>
Wiki : <https://www.cmnog.cm/dokuwiki>
Surveys : <https://survey.cmnog.cm>
Subscribe to Mailing List : <https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/>
Mailing List's Archives : <https://lists.cmnog.cm/pipermail/cmnog/>
Last Event's Feed : <https://twitter.com/hashtag/cmNOGlab3>
<https://twitter.com/cmN0G>
<https://facebook.com/cmNOG>
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/REBOOTcmNOG>
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/cmNOG>
<https://cmnog.wordpress.com/>
--
Regards,
Sylvain B.
<http://www.chretiennement.org>
__
Website : <https://www.cmnog.cm>
Wiki : <https://www.cmnog.cm/dokuwiki>
Surveys : <https://survey.cmnog.cm>
Subscribe to Mailing List : <https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/>
Mailing List's Archives : <https://lists.cmnog.cm/pipermail/cmnog/>
Last Event's Feed : <https://twitter.com/hashtag/cmNOGlab3>
<https://twitter.com/cmN0G>
<https://facebook.com/cmNOG>
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/REBOOTcmNOG>
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/cmNOG>
<https://cmnog.wordpress.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190626/ebfe8da1/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x0387408365AC8594.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 4826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190626/ebfe8da1/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190626/ebfe8da1/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the RPD
mailing list