Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Last Call | Decisions on policy proposals discussed during the meeting
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Wed Jun 26 10:22:39 UTC 2019
+1
Owen
> On Jun 25, 2019, at 04:28 , Frank Habicht <geier at geier.ne.tz> wrote:
>
> I agree.
> Frank
>
> On 25/06/2019 13:42, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
>> In my opinion, it should be clearly defined up-front. Otherwise “legally
>> speaking”, it creates “procedural indefension”.
>>
>>
>>
>> Both, people supporting and people objecting to any policy proposal must
>> know “a priori” the terms.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jordi
>>
>> @jordipalet
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> El 25/6/19 12:38, "Moses Serugo" <moses.serugo at gmail.com
>> <mailto:moses.serugo at gmail.com <mailto:moses.serugo at gmail.com>>> escribió:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello Jordi,
>>
>>
>>
>> The last call period is at least two weeks from today but can be any
>> maximum based of feedback received and reactions from the community.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Moses
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019, 1:26 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
>> <jordi.palet at consulintel.es <mailto:jordi.palet at consulintel.es> <mailto:jordi.palet at consulintel.es <mailto:jordi.palet at consulintel.es>>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Moses,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your quick reaction on this and for the good
>> summary to the community.
>>
>>
>>
>> One clarification that is needed from your side, if you don’t mind.
>>
>>
>>
>> For the two policy proposals that reached consensus and had started
>> the last-call period today, is it a default/minimum two-weeks ?
>>
>>
>>
>> My opinion is tha two-weeks is sufficient considering that in both
>> proposals, neither in the list or in the meeting, there was any
>> opossition (if I recall correctly), but it is neccesary to clearly
>> state it in the “last-call” announcement from a procedural point of
>> view.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jordi
>>
>> @jordipalet
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> El 25/6/19 12:10, "Moses Serugo" <moses.serugo at gmail.com <mailto:moses.serugo at gmail.com>
>> <mailto:moses.serugo at gmail.com <mailto:moses.serugo at gmail.com>>> escribió:
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear PDWG members,
>>
>> Consequent to the discussions by the PDWG community present at
>> AFRINIC-30 during the Public Policy Meeting held on 19th June 2019
>> in Kampala Uganda, the following two policy proposals below have
>> been moved to “*Last* *Call*”, starting today 25th June 2019.
>>
>> *A) IPv6 PI Update (AFPUB-2018-V6-004) currently CPM 6.8.2(v)*
>>
>> *B) AFPUB-2018-v4-001-DRAFT-01 (SL Update)*
>>
>>
>>
>> *_Decisions on policy proposals discussed during the meeting_*
>>
>>
>>
>> *AFRINIC Policy Development Process – bis*
>>
>> *Decision: **Back to list for further discussion and refinement*
>>
>> *https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2017-gen-002-d5#proposal* <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2017-gen-002-d5#proposal*>
>> <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2017-gen-002-d5 <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2017-gen-002-d5>>
>>
>> This proposal is a major revision of the current Policy Development
>> Process. Major highlights include:
>>
>> • A clearer mechanism for appeals and disputes.
>>
>> • Introduction of distinct phases in the policy proposal life
>> cycle.
>>
>> • More transparency around consensus-gauging.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Abuse*
>> <https://afrinic.net/en/community/policy-development/policy-proposals/2313-ipv6-policy-and-references-update <https://afrinic.net/en/community/policy-development/policy-proposals/2313-ipv6-policy-and-references-update>>*Contact
>> Policy Update*
>>
>> *Decision: **Back to list for further discussion and refinement*
>>
>> https://afrinic.net/policy/2018-gen-001-d2 <https://afrinic.net/policy/2018-gen-001-d2>
>>
>> Updates CPM 8.0 (Abuse Contact Information) with the following key
>> amendments:
>>
>> • Introduction of a mandatory “abuse-c” attribute into
>> inetnum, inet6num and aut-num whois database objects for resources
>> directly issued by AFRINIC. The value of this attribute is an
>> “abuse-mailbox”, which must be a valid e-mail address.
>>
>> • A mechanism is proposed to validate the “abuse-mailbox” and
>> report/escalate invalid or those that are unresponsive.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Provisions for Resource Hijacking*
>>
>> *Decision: **Back to list for further discussion and refinement*
>>
>> https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/provisions-for-resource-hijacking <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/provisions-for-resource-hijacking>
>>
>> The proposal provides a framework for recognizing that IP address
>> hijacks are a policy violation within the AFRINIC service region. A
>> method to identify and report hijacks is proposed and a pool of
>> experts chosen from the community is instituted to investigate each
>> reported case.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *IPv4 Inter-RIR Legacy Resource Transfers*
>>
>> *Decision: **Back to list for further discussion and refinement*
>>
>> https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-001-d1#proposal <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-001-d1#proposal>
>> <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-001-d1 <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-001-d1>>
>>
>> • Establishes a mechanism to allow transfers of *legacy* IPv4 space
>> to/from other regions. The intent is to align AFRINIC with an IPv4
>> address market that already exists for which AFRICA is not currently
>> part.
>>
>> • The author fronted two Inter-RIR proposals with hope to withdraw
>> one if the other passes through.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *IPv4 Inter-RIR Resource Transfers (Comprehensive Scope)*
>> <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-002-d1 <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-002-d1>>
>>
>> *Decision: **Back to list for further discussion and refinement*
>>
>> *https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-002-d1* <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-002-d1*>
>>
>> • Allows establishing a mechanism to allow transfers of IPv4 space
>> to/from other regions. The intent is to align AFRINIC with an IPv4
>> address market that already exists for which AFRICA is not currently
>> part.
>>
>> • The author fronted two Inter-RIR proposals with hope to withdraw
>> one if the other passes through.
>>
>>
>>
>> *IPv6 PI Clarification*
>>
>> *Decision: **Last Call*
>>
>> *https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v6-001-d2#proposal* <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v6-001-d2#proposal*>
>> <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v6-001-d2 <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v6-001-d2>>
>>
>> • Amends original policy proposal “IPv6 PI Update”
>> (AFPUB-2018-V6-004) currently CPM 6.8.2(v), which requires that IPv6
>> PI space should be announced within 12 months of getting it, and
>> should not be disaggregated.
>>
>> • This proposal does not make it mandatory to announce the
>> space, since there is no RFC1918 equivalent for IPv4, and cases like
>> IXP peering LAN space doesn’t necessarily have to be announced. If
>> announced however, the condition to disaggregate it is still in place.
>>
>>
>>
>> *SL Update*
>>
>> *Decision: **Last Call*
>>
>> *https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2018-v4-001* <https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2018-v4-001*>
>>
>> Proposes an update to CPM 5.4.7.2 which removes the Board’s power to
>> replenish the (exhaustion) pool with any IPv4 space available at the
>> time (such as the /12 reserve in 5.4.7.1). The proposal also
>> stipulates that the same /12, if still unused by the time phase 2
>> space is exhausted, be automatically
>>
>>
>>
>> *Multihoming not required for ASN*
>>
>> *Decision: **Back to list for further discussion and refinement*
>>
>> *https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-asn-001-d2* <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-asn-001-d2*>
>>
>> Modifies CPM 7.4 by removing 7.4.2, a clause requiring requestors of
>> ASNs to be multihomed (or demonstrate plan thereof). Instead, the
>> proposal sets the following criteria:
>>
>> • A unique routing policy or
>>
>> • Interconnection with one or more other ASNs which requires a
>> globally unique ASN.
>>
>> • An organization will also be eligible if it can demonstrate that
>> it will meet any of the above criteria upon receiving an ASN (or
>> within the following six months).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Internet Number Resources Review by AFRINIC*
>>
>> *Decision: **Back to list for further discussion and refinement*
>>
>> *https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2016-gen-001-d8* <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2016-gen-001-d8*>
>>
>> The proposal introduces a mechanism for AFRINIC to conduct reviews
>> (or audits) for IPv4 number resources issued to members, and
>> recommends reclamation of resources that are found to be in breach
>> or not in compliance.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Clarification on temporary resource usage*
>>
>> */This proposal was withdrawn by authors just before it was discussed/*
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>>
>> *Moses Serugo*
>> PDWG Chair - AFRINIC
>> Tel: +256772212481
>> Email: moses.serugo at gmail.com <mailto:moses.serugo at gmail.com> <mailto:moses.serugo at gmail.com <mailto:moses.serugo at gmail.com>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list
>> RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net> <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>>
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>
>>
>> **********************************************
>> IPv4 is over
>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>> http://www.theipv6company.com
>> The IPv6 Company
>>
>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged
>> or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive
>> use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty
>> authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents
>> of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is
>> strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If
>> you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure,
>> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information,
>> even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited,
>> will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
>> original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
>>
>>
>> **********************************************
>> IPv4 is over
>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>> http://www.theipv6company.com
>> The IPv6 Company
>>
>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
>> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
>> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
>> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
>> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
>> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
>> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution
>> or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
>> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
>> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
>> communication and delete it.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RPD mailing list
>> RPD at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190626/7c8983b0/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the RPD
mailing list