[rpd] Last Call | Decisions on policy proposals discussed during the meeting

Tue Jun 25 11:28:34 UTC 2019

I agree.
Frank

On 25/06/2019 13:42, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
> In my opinion, it should be clearly defined up-front. Otherwise “legally
> speaking”, it creates “procedural indefension”.
> 
>  
> 
> Both, people supporting and people objecting to any policy proposal must
> know “a priori” the terms.
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jordi
> 
> @jordipalet
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> El 25/6/19 12:38, "Moses Serugo" <moses.serugo at gmail.com
> <mailto:moses.serugo at gmail.com>> escribió:
> 
>  
> 
> Hello Jordi,
> 
>  
> 
> The last call period is at least two weeks from today but can be any
> maximum based of feedback received and reactions from the community.
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Moses
> 
>  
> 
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019, 1:26 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> <jordi.palet at consulintel.es <mailto:jordi.palet at consulintel.es>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Moses,
> 
>      
> 
>     Thanks a lot for your quick reaction on this and for the good
>     summary to the community.
> 
>      
> 
>     One clarification that is needed from your side, if you don’t mind.
> 
>      
> 
>     For the two policy proposals that reached consensus and had started
>     the last-call period today, is it a default/minimum two-weeks ?
> 
>      
> 
>     My opinion is tha two-weeks is sufficient considering that in both
>     proposals, neither in the list or in the meeting, there was any
>     opossition (if I recall correctly), but it is neccesary to clearly
>     state it in the “last-call” announcement from a procedural point of
>     view.
> 
>      
> 
>     Regards,
> 
>     Jordi
> 
>     @jordipalet
> 
>      
> 
>      
> 
>      
> 
>     El 25/6/19 12:10, "Moses Serugo" <moses.serugo at gmail.com
>     <mailto:moses.serugo at gmail.com>> escribió:
> 
>      
> 
>     Dear PDWG members,
> 
>     Consequent to the discussions by the PDWG community present at
>     AFRINIC-30 during the Public Policy Meeting held on 19th June 2019
>     in Kampala Uganda, the following two policy proposals below have
>     been moved to “*Last* *Call*”, starting today 25th June 2019.
> 
>     *A) IPv6 PI Update (AFPUB-2018-V6-004) currently CPM 6.8.2(v)*
> 
>     *B) AFPUB-2018-v4-001-DRAFT-01 (SL Update)*
> 
>      
> 
>     *_Decisions on policy proposals discussed during the meeting_*
> 
>      
> 
>     *AFRINIC Policy Development Process – bis*
> 
>     *Decision:  **Back to list for further discussion and refinement*
> 
>     *https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2017-gen-002-d5#proposal*
>     <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2017-gen-002-d5>
> 
>     This proposal is a major revision of the current Policy Development
>     Process. Major highlights include:
> 
>     •       A clearer mechanism for appeals and disputes.
> 
>     •       Introduction of distinct phases in the policy proposal life
>     cycle.
> 
>     •       More transparency around consensus-gauging.
> 
>      
> 
>      
> 
>     *Abuse*
>     <https://afrinic.net/en/community/policy-development/policy-proposals/2313-ipv6-policy-and-references-update>*Contact
>     Policy Update*
> 
>     *Decision:  **Back to list for further discussion and refinement*
> 
>     https://afrinic.net/policy/2018-gen-001-d2
> 
>     Updates CPM 8.0 (Abuse Contact Information) with the following key
>     amendments: 
> 
>     •       Introduction of a mandatory “abuse-c” attribute into
>     inetnum, inet6num and aut-num whois database objects for resources
>     directly issued by AFRINIC. The value of this attribute is an
>     “abuse-mailbox”, which must be a valid e-mail address.
> 
>     •       A mechanism is proposed to validate the “abuse-mailbox” and
>     report/escalate invalid or those that are unresponsive.
> 
>      
> 
>      
> 
>     *Provisions for Resource Hijacking*
> 
>     *Decision:  **Back to list for further discussion and refinement*
> 
>     https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/provisions-for-resource-hijacking
> 
>     The proposal provides a framework for recognizing that IP address
>     hijacks are a policy violation within the AFRINIC service region. A
>     method to identify and report hijacks is proposed and a pool of
>     experts chosen from the community is instituted  to investigate each
>     reported case.
> 
>      
> 
>      
> 
>     *IPv4 Inter-RIR Legacy Resource Transfers*
> 
>     *Decision:  **Back to list for further discussion and refinement*
> 
>     https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-001-d1#proposal
>     <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-001-d1>
> 
>     •  Establishes a mechanism to allow transfers of *legacy* IPv4 space
>     to/from other regions. The intent is to align AFRINIC with an IPv4
>     address market that already exists for which AFRICA is not currently
>     part.
> 
>     •   The author fronted two Inter-RIR proposals with hope to withdraw
>     one if the other passes through.
> 
>      
> 
>      
> 
>     *IPv4 Inter-RIR Resource Transfers (Comprehensive Scope)*
>     <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-002-d1>
> 
>     *Decision:  **Back to list for further discussion and refinement*
> 
>     *https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-002-d1*
> 
>     •   Allows establishing a mechanism to allow transfers of IPv4 space
>     to/from other regions. The intent is to align AFRINIC with an IPv4
>     address market that already exists for which AFRICA is not currently
>     part.
> 
>     •  The author fronted two Inter-RIR proposals with hope to withdraw
>     one if the other passes through.
> 
>       
> 
>     *IPv6 PI Clarification*
> 
>     *Decision:  **Last Call*
> 
>     *https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v6-001-d2#proposal*
>     <https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v6-001-d2>
> 
>     •       Amends original policy proposal “IPv6 PI Update”
>     (AFPUB-2018-V6-004) currently CPM 6.8.2(v), which requires that IPv6
>     PI space should be announced within 12 months of getting it, and
>     should not be disaggregated.
> 
>     •       This proposal does not make it mandatory to announce the
>     space, since there is no RFC1918 equivalent for IPv4, and cases like
>     IXP peering LAN space doesn’t necessarily have to be announced. If
>     announced however, the condition to disaggregate it is still in place.
> 
>      
> 
>     *SL Update*
> 
>     *Decision:  **Last Call*
> 
>     *https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2018-v4-001*
> 
>     Proposes an update to CPM 5.4.7.2 which removes the Board’s power to
>     replenish the (exhaustion) pool with any IPv4 space available at the
>     time (such as the /12 reserve in 5.4.7.1).  The proposal also
>     stipulates that the same /12, if still unused by the time phase 2
>     space is exhausted, be automatically
> 
>      
> 
>      *Multihoming not required for ASN*
> 
>     *Decision:  **Back to list for further discussion and refinement*
> 
>     *https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-asn-001-d2*
> 
>     Modifies CPM 7.4 by removing 7.4.2, a clause requiring requestors of
>     ASNs to be multihomed (or demonstrate plan thereof). Instead, the
>     proposal sets the following criteria:
> 
>     •   A unique routing policy or
> 
>     •   Interconnection with one or more other ASNs which requires a
>     globally unique ASN.
> 
>     •  An organization will also be eligible if it can demonstrate that
>     it will meet any of the above criteria upon receiving an ASN (or
>     within the following six months).
> 
>      
> 
>      
> 
>     *Internet Number Resources Review by AFRINIC*
> 
>     *Decision:  **Back to list for further discussion and refinement*
> 
>     *https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2016-gen-001-d8*
> 
>     The proposal introduces a mechanism for AFRINIC to conduct reviews
>     (or audits) for IPv4 number resources issued to members, and
>     recommends reclamation of resources that are found to be in breach
>     or not in compliance.
> 
>      
> 
>     *Clarification on temporary resource usage*
> 
>     */This proposal was withdrawn by authors just before it was discussed/*
> 
>      
> 
>     Thanks & Regards,
> 
>     *Moses Serugo*
>     PDWG Chair - AFRINIC
>     Tel: +256772212481
>     Email: moses.serugo at gmail.com <mailto:moses.serugo at gmail.com>
> 
>     _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list
>     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> 
> 
>     **********************************************
>     IPv4 is over
>     Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>     http://www.theipv6company.com
>     The IPv6 Company
> 
>     This electronic message contains information which may be privileged
>     or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive
>     use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty
>     authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents
>     of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is
>     strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If
>     you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure,
>     copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information,
>     even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited,
>     will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
>     original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution
> or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> 