Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] ssisted Registry Checks

Jaco Kroon jaco at uls.co.za
Tue Jun 25 10:52:06 UTC 2019


Nasir,

Definitely not "may run to court", "will run to court".


Kind Regards,
Jaco Kroon
C.E.O.

*T:* +27 (0)12 021 0000 | *F:* +27 86 648 8561 | *E:* jaco at iewc.co.za
*W:* iewc.co.za <http://www.iewc.co.za/> | *A:* Unit 201, Building 2B, 
Sunwood Park, Queen's Crescent Lynnwood, Pretoria


	

Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/Interexcel/> Twitter 
<https://twitter.com/Interexcel/> Google+ 
<https://plus.google.com/+InterexcelCoZaPTA/posts> LinkedIn 
<http://www.linkedin.com/com/images/ico-linkedin.jpg>

<http://www.iewc.co.za/> <http://www.uls.co.za/>

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer: 
View Disclaimer <http://www.iewc.co.za/email-disclaimer/>

On 2019/06/25 11:56, Nasir Faruk wrote:
> The ARC appears more useful as the scope is somehow narrower when 
> compared to what was proposed in INR and this may eventually 
> significantly reduce the financial implication for the audit. Even 
> though, the financial implication as a result of litigation may still 
> apply. The reason here, the ARC empowers the registry to either 
> request for update from the member or terminate contractual agreement 
> leading to the deregistration of their Internet number resources. Its 
> very natural affected ISPs may run to court!
>
> @Caleb,
>
> Honestly, I don’t see implementing INR without litigation. Certainly, 
> this will happen and I see it coming!
>
> Faruk
>
> ..........................................................................................................
>
> //
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 8:49 AM <rpd-request at afrinic.net 
> <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>> wrote:
>
>     Send RPD mailing list submissions to
>     rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>
>
>     To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>     or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>     rpd-request at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>
>
>     You can reach the person managing the list at
>     rpd-owner at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd-owner at afrinic.net>
>
>     When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>     than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."
>
>
>     Today's Topics:
>
>        1. Re: Assisted Registry Checks (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
>
>
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     Message: 1
>     Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:48:23 +0200
>     From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es
>     <mailto:jordi.palet at consulintel.es>>
>     To: <rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>
>     Subject: Re: [rpd] Assisted Registry Checks
>     Message-ID: <9D759EF6-DA60-4C87-9DB7-781565B65E81 at consulintel.es
>     <mailto:9D759EF6-DA60-4C87-9DB7-781565B65E81 at consulintel.es>>
>     Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="UTF-8"
>
>     Agree, however, by starting it, the community can see if there is
>     an actual need for something else or not, or just provinding
>     inputs to the "ARC" (whatever the staff calls it) process.
>
>     Regards,
>     Jordi
>     @jordipalet
>
>
>
>     ?El 25/6/19 1:27, "Dewole Ajao" <dewole at forum.org.ng
>     <mailto:dewole at forum.org.ng>> escribi?:
>
>         I should point out that my suggestion of the ARCs is a minimum
>     that
>         staff should be able to carry out starting now (with no big deal);
>
>         It is not necessarily an alternative to the ongoing discussion on
>         resource review.
>
>         Regards,
>
>         Dewole.
>
>         On 6/24/2019 10:12 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
>         > Hi Dewole,
>         >
>         > This is actually a good idea, and if I recall correctly, in
>     the case of RIPE NCC, this was designed by the staff itself,
>     looking for an objetive and fair process, and avoiding "flase
>     claims" about possible competitors.
>         >
>         > https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-694
>         >
>         > You can see that this doesn't have the "random" bit of the
>     review policy proposal, and still allows any member that has
>     suspicius information about another member to tell the staff.
>         >
>         > The staff will then review that information, but the main
>     difference is that if they feel the information is wrong, they
>     aren't mandated to start a complete audit.
>         >
>         > Regards,
>         > Jordi
>         > @jordipalet
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > ?El 24/6/19 22:45, "Dewole Ajao" <dewole at forum.org.ng
>     <mailto:dewole at forum.org.ng>> escribi?:
>         >
>         >      [was Re: [rpd] Proposal Update received: Internet
>     Number Resources
>         >      Review by AFRINIC]
>         >
>         >      With the type of audit/review being discussed, the
>     costs may vary
>         >      significantly from member to member - whether
>     AFRINIC-side or Member-side.
>         >
>         >      I have however in the past mentioned that RIPE NCC has
>     something simple
>         >      and time-efficient called Assisted Registry Checks and
>     if I remember
>         >      correctly, they aim to check records for every member
>     once in two years.
>         >      While we await the audit/review/recovery policy, it
>     would be nice to see
>         >      AFRINIC start to implement basic checks (even before a
>     member comes for
>         >      a repeat allocation).
>         >
>         >      See
>         >
>     https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-management/assisted-registry-check
>         >
>         >
>         >      These are simple checks to ensure registry accuracy and
>     I see no reason
>         >      why anyone would try to discourage AFRINIC from
>     checking the accuracy of
>         >      its records with the assistance of members.
>         >
>         >      This first step we can all agree on and staff can
>     implement almost
>         >      immediately (in addition to the work they are already
>     doing when members
>         >      come to them with issues arising from our
>     lame-delegations and
>         >      no-reverse-unless-assigned policies).
>         >
>         >      Regards,
>         >
>         >      Dewole.
>         >
>         >
>         >      On 6/24/2019 7:20 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
>         >      > Hi Ish,
>         >      >
>         >      > I understand that, but my point is that there are two
>     sides of the cost. And both should be considered:
>         >      >
>         >      > a) The cost for Afrinic (lets talk about average) for
>     each review to an ISP.
>         >      >
>         >      > b) The cost for each member being reviewed (again we
>     can get examples to calculate an average).
>         >      >
>         >      > Regards,
>         >      > Jordi
>         >      > @jordipalet
>         >      >
>         >      >
>         >      >
>         >      > ?El 24/6/19 20:00, "Ish Sookun"
>     <ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu <mailto:ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu>>
>     escribi?:
>         >      >
>         >      >      I only requested an indicative value. I didn't
>     ask to consider all
>         >      >      possibilities (e.g litigation, big or small ISP
>     etc). The idea is to
>         >      >      obtain an approximate cost figure to evaluate
>     whether the mere
>         >      >      implementation of this policy brings a financial
>     burden on AfriNIC.
>         >      >
>         >      >      Regards,
>         >      >
>         >      >      Ish Sookun
>         >      >
>         >      >      On 6/24/19 7:31 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD
>     wrote:
>         >      >      > I think there is one more cost to be
>     considered here as well.
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > Each time an ISP gets the audit, it will need
>     to dedicate staff for that.
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > It is dificult to calculate ?how much? that
>     means, as it may depend on
>         >      >      > many factors, such as how big is the ISP, how
>     many resources they have,
>         >      >      > how many customers from different types
>     (business, residential), what
>         >      >      > provisioning system they have, IPAM if any,
>     level of ?automation? and
>         >      >      > ?inventory? of the network, etc.
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > May be it is a good exersice for some of you
>     to calculate (rought idea),
>         >      >      > how much staff/resources and how many weeks,
>     this will take to you, if
>         >      >      > the policy it is implemented?
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > A few examples, could help the community to
>     take a decision.
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > Regards,
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > Jordi
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > @jordipalet
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > El 24/6/19 17:25, "Timothy Ola Akinfenwa"
>     <akin.akinfenwa at uniosun.edu.ng <mailto:akin.akinfenwa at uniosun.edu.ng>
>         >      >      > <mailto:akin.akinfenwa at uniosun.edu.ng
>     <mailto:akin.akinfenwa at uniosun.edu.ng>>> escribi?:
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > Hello Andrew,
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > While I also agree that Staff provide
>     information on the likely
>         >      >      > financial implication for the audit, I don't
>     understand why there should
>         >      >      > be a separate allocation for litigation.
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > Is it wise for an organisation to budget funds
>     for likely court cases
>         >      >      > when instead they should strive to prevent one
>     in the first place?
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > For me, I think it is critical to ensure that
>     Staff actions on any audit
>         >      >      > review does not amount to litigation. And this
>     may be captured as a
>         >      >      > suggestion in the policy as well, if necessary.
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > Best!
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > Sent from my OnePlus mobile device! </>$aa;
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, 3:53 PM Andrew Alston,
>         >      >      > <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com
>     <mailto:Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>
>         >      >      > <mailto:Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com
>     <mailto:Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>>> wrote:
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >     I would agree that these numbers would be
>     useful - and must in
>         >      >      >     addition include contingent liability
>     allocation for litigation that
>         >      >      >     could result due to implementation of this
>     policy
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >     Andrew
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >     Liquid Telecommunications - Group Head Of
>     IP Strategy
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>      ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >     *From:*Ish Sookun
>     <ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu <mailto:ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu>
>         >      >      >     <mailto:ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu
>     <mailto:ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu>>>
>         >      >      >     *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2019 5:39:19 PM
>         >      >      >     *To:* rpd at afrinic.net
>     <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net> <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net
>     <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>
>         >      >      >     *Subject:* Re: [rpd] Proposal Update
>     received: Internet Number
>         >      >      >     Resources Review by AFRINIC
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >     Dear PDWG Co-Chairs,
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >     It was expressed during the last meeting
>     that this policy will have
>         >      >      >     financial implications on AfriNIC due to
>     costs associated to auditing.
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >     Is it possible to obtain an approximate
>     cost figure (from staff) that
>         >      >      >     such audits would entail?
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >     Regards,
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >     Ish Sookun
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >     On 6/8/19 10:24 PM, Dewole Ajao wrote:
>         >      >      >     > Dear PDWG members,
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > This is to inform you that authors of
>     the policy proposal named
>         >      >      >     "Internet Number Resources Review by
>     AFRINIC" have submitted an
>         >      >      >     updated version (Draft version 8) as
>     included below. The URL will be
>         >      >      >     shared once published online.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > Please take some time to go through the
>     proposal contents and
>         >      >      >     provide your feedback.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > Thank you.
>         >      >      >     > PDWG Co-Chairs
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > ------------------- Begin
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >
>      ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     >     Name : Internet Number Resources
>     Review by AFRINIC (Draft 8)
>         >      >      >     >     Ref. Name: AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT08
>         >      >      >     >     Status: Under Discussion
>         >      >      >     >     Date: 7 June 2019
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > Authors:
>         >      >      >     >         (a) Amelina A. A. Arnaud |
>     <arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg>
>         >      >      >     <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg
>     <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg>>
>         >      >      >     > <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg
>     <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg>
>         >      >      >     <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg
>     <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg>>>> | AUF/TogoRER
>         >      >      >     >         (b) Jean-Baptiste Millogo
>     |<jean.millogo at orange.com <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com>
>         >      >      >     <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com
>     <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com>>
>         >      >      >     > <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com
>     <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com>
>         >      >      >     <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com
>     <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com>>>>| Orange Burkina
>         >      >      >     >         (c) Marcus ADOMEY 
>     <madomey at ug.edu.gh <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh>
>         >      >      >     <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh
>     <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh>>
>         >      >      >     > <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh
>     <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh> <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh
>     <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh>>>> |
>         >      >      >     University of Ghana
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 13.0 Summary of the Problem Being
>     Addressed by this Policy Proposal
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > As Internet Number resources are finite,
>     their allocation is based on
>         >      >      >     > the operational needs of end-users and
>     Internet Services Providers,
>         >      >      >     > while avoiding stockpiling in accordance
>     with RFC7020, IPv4 Allocation
>         >      >      >     > Policy CPM 5.5, IPv6 Allocation and
>     assignment policy CPM 6.5 and
>         >      >      >     Policy
>         >      >      >     > for Autonomous System Numbers (ASN)
>     Management in the AFRINIC
>         >      >      >     region CPM
>         >      >      >     > 7.0.Section 4 of the Registration
>     Service Agreement (RSA) provides the
>         >      >      >     > framework for investigations of the
>     usage of allocated Internet Number
>         >      >      >     > resources, defines members? obligation
>     to cooperate and the
>         >      >      >     measures to
>         >      >      >     > be taken by AFRINIC in case of failure
>     to comply. The lack of such
>         >      >      >     > investigation or regular control can
>     lead to inefficient usage of the
>         >      >      >     > Internet Number resources, to
>     stockpiling and other type of abuses.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 13.0.1 Summary of How this Proposal
>     Addresses the Problem
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > In order to ensure efficient and
>     appropriate use of resources, AFRINIC
>         >      >      >     > shall conduct regular reviews of
>     resource utilisation held by its
>         >      >      >     > members. This would allow recovery of
>     any type of resource, where
>         >      >      >     usage
>         >      >      >     > is not in compliance with the RSA. Those
>     resources can be reallocated
>         >      >      >     > for better usage.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 13.0.2 Proposal
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > The policy proposal will modify the CPM
>     as follows:
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > Insert a section 13 to the CPM as follows:
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 13.0 Internet Number Resources Review
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > Regular reviews of resource utilisation
>     are conducted by AFRINIC to
>         >      >      >     > ensure efficient and appropriate usage
>     of resources. This allows for
>         >      >      >     > recovery of any type of resource where
>     usage is not in compliance with
>         >      >      >     > the RSA; to allow such resources to be
>     reallocated for better usage.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 13.1 The reviews shall be based on
>     compliance with the terms
>         >      >      >     outlined in
>         >      >      >     > the RSA and Allocation/Assignment Policies.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 13.2 The reviews cover all
>     allocated/Assigned resources, but priority
>         >      >      >     > goes to IPv4 and ASN mappable to
>     two-octet ASN.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 13.3 Classes of review: Members to be
>     reviewed shall be selected
>         >      >      >     > according to the following classes:
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 13.3.1 Random
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > The member is chosen by AFRINIC at
>     random between the members who has
>         >      >      >     > not been reviewed for any other reasons
>     in  the preceding 24 months.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 13.3.2 Selected
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     >  Member is selected because of an
>     internal report or due to a lack of
>         >      >      >     > contact between the AFRINIC and the member.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 13.3.3 Reported:
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > Here, members are reviewed either because:
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > A) They have requested the review
>     themselves or
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > B) There has been a community complaint
>     made against them that
>         >      >      >     warrants
>         >      >      >     > investigation. Complaints shall be
>     backed by evidence and AFRINIC
>         >      >      >     staff
>         >      >      >     > shall evaluate the facts as appropriate
>     to conduct the review. However
>         >      >      >     > this review is not applicable to a
>     member  with the same resources
>         >      >      >     > portfolio on which a full review has
>     been completed in the
>         >      >      >     preceding 24
>         >      >      >     > months.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     >  AFRINIC staff may, at its sole
>     discretion, after having assessed the
>         >      >      >     > nature of the evidence found in the
>     community complaint, require that
>         >      >      >     > such evidence be (i) submitted in the
>     form of a sworn affidavit or
>         >      >      >     (ii)
>         >      >      >     > declared to be true before a
>     Commissioner of Oath.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 13.4 In case of non-compliance and if
>     evidence has been established in
>         >      >      >     > accordance with:
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > ?    Breach of AFRINIC policies
>         >      >      >     > ?    Breach of the provisions of the
>     registration service agreement or
>         >      >      >     > other legal agreements between the
>     organisation holding the
>         >      >      >     resource and
>         >      >      >     > AFRINIC.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > AFRNIC shall initiate the resource
>     recovery process on the portion of
>         >      >      >     > addresses found to be noncompliant.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > A) AFRINIC shall attempt to contact the
>     organisation and correct any
>         >      >      >     > discrepancy towards the RSA. Except in
>     cases of fraudulent resource
>         >      >      >     > acquisition or unlawful usage and abuse,
>     the organization shall be
>         >      >      >     > given a minimum of six(6) months to
>     effect the return of the
>         >      >      >     resources.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > If the organisation is cooperative and
>     working in good faith to
>         >      >      >     > substantially restore compliance or has
>     a valid need for
>         >      >      >     additional time
>         >      >      >     > to renumber out of the affected blocks,
>     AFRINIC shall negotiate a
>         >      >      >     longer
>         >      >      >     > term.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > The acceptance level of compliance and
>     duration of the longer term are
>         >      >      >     > at AFRINIC staff discretion.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > B) If the situation cannot be rectified
>     and the member did not
>         >      >      >     transfer
>         >      >      >     > the resources to meet other
>     AFRINIC-approved needs as per adopted
>         >      >      >     policies
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     >  AFRINIC shall publish the resources to
>     be recovered for a period of
>         >      >      >     > three (3) months; during which the
>     organisation may at any time, seek
>         >      >      >     > compliance or transfer the resources to
>     other members
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     >  After this period, the resource shall
>     be recovered and therefore the
>         >      >      >     > records of the previous holder of the
>     recovered resource shall be
>         >      >      >     > updated in AFRINIC?s databases.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > C)  Any Internet Number Resources
>     recovered under this policy may be
>         >      >      >     > assigned/allocated under existing
>     Allocation and Assignment Policies.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 13.5 Appeal procedure
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > Reviewed members who are not satisfied
>     have the right to appeal
>         >      >      >     against
>         >      >      >     > the results on the review within the
>     four weeks following
>         >      >      >     communication
>         >      >      >     > of the results by AFRINIC. Appeals shall
>     follow an arbitration process
>         >      >      >     > as provided for in the
>         >      >      >     > Code de Procedure Civile (Code of Civil
>     Procedure) of the Republic of
>         >      >      >     > Mauritius. AFRINIC may, on request from
>     an aggrieved party, suggest a
>         >      >      >     > pool of arbitrators who shall be
>     knowledgeable volunteers from the
>         >      >      >     > community.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 13.6 Compliance Report
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > AFRINIC shall publish an annual
>     meaningful report describing review
>         >      >      >     > activities, in accordance with all
>     applicable laws and regulations.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 13.7 Acknowledgements
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > The authors thank Ms Wafa Dahmani
>     Zaafouri (become Afrinic GC
>         >      >      >     Chair), Mr
>         >      >      >     > Serge ILUNGA (become Afrinic Board
>     member)  and Mr Alain P. Aina for
>         >      >      >     > their  contributions in the development
>     of this Policy proposal.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > The authors also thank the community for
>     the discussions and
>         >      >      >     contributions.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 4.0 Revision History
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 18 May 2016
>         >      >      >     >   Version 1.0
>         >      >      >     > - First Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT01
>         >      >      >     > - Posted on RPD list
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 05 Aug 2016
>         >      >      >     >   Version 2.0
>         >      >      >     > - Second Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT02
>         >      >      >     > - Change on the policy?s name
>         >      >      >     > - Addition of the Acknowledgement section
>         >      >      >     > - Rephrasing of section 3.3.3
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 18 Nov 2016
>         >      >      >     > Version 3.0
>         >      >      >     > - Third Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT03
>         >      >      >     > - Update of section 3.3.3 from
>     discussions on mailing list
>         >      >      >     > - Update of section 3.7
>     (Acknowledgements) to thank the community for
>         >      >      >     > discussions and contributions
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 11 Apr 2017
>         >      >      >     > Version 4.0
>         >      >      >     > - Fourth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT04
>         >      >      >     > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.4
>         >      >      >     > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.5
>         >      >      >     > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.6
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 21 Oct. 2107
>         >      >      >     > Version 5.0
>         >      >      >     > - Fifth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT05
>         >      >      >     > - Adding the paragraph C to 13.3.3.
>     according to the legal counsel
>         >      >      >     > proposition
>         >      >      >     > - Rephrasing the paragraph 13.5 to
>     comply with staff and legal
>         >      >      >     assessment
>         >      >      >     > - Rephrasing the paragraph 13.6 to
>     comply with staff assessment and
>         >      >      >     > avoid any ambiguity
>         >      >      >     > - Changing the co-authors list
>         >      >      >     > - Updating the Acknowledgement session
>         >      >      >     > - Amending 13.4 (B) to  reflect the
>     Transfer policies
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 06 Apr. 2018
>         >      >      >     > Version 6.0
>         >      >      >     > - Sixth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT06
>         >      >      >     > - Removing categorisation between
>     membership in random class
>         >      >      >     section 13.3.1
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 06 Apr. 2019
>         >      >      >     > Version 07
>         >      >      >     > - Seventh Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT07
>         >      >      >     > - Modifying section 13.4 Paragraph A) to
>     clarify the resources
>         >      >      >     recovery
>         >      >      >     > process: set conditions  under which a
>     member could be given
>         >      >      >     longer term
>         >      >      >     >  to effect the return of  affected
>     resources.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     > 29 may. 2019
>         >      >      >     > Version 08
>         >      >      >     > -  Eighth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT08
>         >      >      >     > -  Section 13.3.1 changes to  : "..The
>     member is chosen by AFRINIC at
>         >      >      >     > random between the members who has not
>     been reviewed for any other
>         >      >      >     > reasons in  the preceding 24 months."
>         >      >      >     > -  Section  13.4  last paragraph changes
>     to : "AFRINIC shall initiate
>         >      >      >     > ... on the portion of addresses found to
>     be noncompliant."
>         >      >      >     > -   Section 13.5 changes to  ?Reviewed
>     members who are not satisfied
>         >      >      >     > have the right to appeal against the
>     results on the review within the
>         >      >      >     > four weeks following communication of
>     the results by AFRINIC??..?
>         >      >      >     > -  Typos and grammatical errors fixed.
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >
>      -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         >      >      >     > End
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >
>      ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >     >
>     _______________________________________________
>         >      >      >     > RPD mailing list
>         >      >      >     > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>     <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>>
>         >      >      >     >
>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>         >      >      >     >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >  _______________________________________________
>         >      >      >     RPD mailing list
>         >      >      > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>     <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>>
>         >      >      > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >  _______________________________________________
>         >      >      >     RPD mailing list
>         >      >      > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>     <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>>
>         >      >      > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>     _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list
>         >      >      > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > **********************************************
>         >      >      > IPv4 is over
>         >      >      > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>         >      >      > http://www.theipv6company.com
>         >      >      > The IPv6 Company
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > This electronic message contains information
>     which may be privileged or
>         >      >      > confidential. The information is intended to
>     be for the exclusive use of
>         >      >      > the individual(s) named above and further
>     non-explicilty authorized
>         >      >      > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of
>     the contents of this
>         >      >      > information, even if partially, including
>     attached files, is strictly
>         >      >      > prohibited and will be considered a criminal
>     offense. If you are not the
>         >      >      > intended recipient be aware that any
>     disclosure, copying, distribution
>         >      >      > or use of the contents of this information,
>     even if partially, including
>         >      >      > attached files, is strictly prohibited, will
>     be considered a criminal
>         >      >      > offense, so you must reply to the original
>     sender to inform about this
>         >      >      > communication and delete it.
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      >
>         >      >      > _______________________________________________
>         >      >      > RPD mailing list
>         >      >      > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>         >      >      > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>         >      >      >
>         >      >
>         >      > _______________________________________________
>         >      >      RPD mailing list
>         >      > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>         >      > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>         >      >
>         >      >
>         >      >
>         >      >
>         >      > **********************************************
>         >      > IPv4 is over
>         >      > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>         >      > http://www.theipv6company.com
>         >      > The IPv6 Company
>         >      >
>         >      > This electronic message contains information which
>     may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to
>     be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and
>     further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying,
>     distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
>     partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and
>     will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended
>     recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
>     use of the contents of this information, even if partially,
>     including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be
>     considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original
>     sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
>         >      >
>         >      >
>         >      >
>         >      >
>         >      > _______________________________________________
>         >      > RPD mailing list
>         >      > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>         >      > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>         >
>         > _______________________________________________
>         >      RPD mailing list
>         > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>         > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > **********************************************
>         > IPv4 is over
>         > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>         > http://www.theipv6company.com
>         > The IPv6 Company
>         >
>         > This electronic message contains information which may be
>     privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for
>     the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further
>     non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use
>     of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
>     attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a
>     criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
>     that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents
>     of this information, even if partially, including attached files,
>     is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so
>     you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
>     communication and delete it.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > RPD mailing list
>         > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>         > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
>
>
>     **********************************************
>     IPv4 is over
>     Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>     http://www.theipv6company.com
>     The IPv6 Company
>
>     This electronic message contains information which may be
>     privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for
>     the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further
>     non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use
>     of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
>     attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a
>     criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
>     that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents
>     of this information, even if partially, including attached files,
>     is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so
>     you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
>     communication and delete it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
>     Subject: Digest Footer
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     RPD mailing list
>     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
>     End of RPD Digest, Vol 153, Issue 184
>     *************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/225da40e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ico-facebook.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1302 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/225da40e/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ico-twitter.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1423 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/225da40e/attachment-0006.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ico-linkedin.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1444 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/225da40e/attachment-0007.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ie.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3906 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/225da40e/attachment-0008.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ulsgroup.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 10458 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/225da40e/attachment-0009.jpg>


More information about the RPD mailing list