Search RPD Archives
[rpd] ssisted Registry Checks
Jaco Kroon
jaco at uls.co.za
Tue Jun 25 10:52:06 UTC 2019
Nasir,
Definitely not "may run to court", "will run to court".
Kind Regards,
Jaco Kroon
C.E.O.
*T:* +27 (0)12 021 0000 | *F:* +27 86 648 8561 | *E:* jaco at iewc.co.za
*W:* iewc.co.za <http://www.iewc.co.za/> | *A:* Unit 201, Building 2B,
Sunwood Park, Queen's Crescent Lynnwood, Pretoria
Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/Interexcel/> Twitter
<https://twitter.com/Interexcel/> Google+
<https://plus.google.com/+InterexcelCoZaPTA/posts> LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/com/images/ico-linkedin.jpg>
<http://www.iewc.co.za/> <http://www.uls.co.za/>
This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
View Disclaimer <http://www.iewc.co.za/email-disclaimer/>
On 2019/06/25 11:56, Nasir Faruk wrote:
> The ARC appears more useful as the scope is somehow narrower when
> compared to what was proposed in INR and this may eventually
> significantly reduce the financial implication for the audit. Even
> though, the financial implication as a result of litigation may still
> apply. The reason here, the ARC empowers the registry to either
> request for update from the member or terminate contractual agreement
> leading to the deregistration of their Internet number resources. Its
> very natural affected ISPs may run to court!
>
> @Caleb,
>
> Honestly, I don’t see implementing INR without litigation. Certainly,
> this will happen and I see it coming!
>
> Faruk
>
> ..........................................................................................................
>
> //
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 8:49 AM <rpd-request at afrinic.net
> <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>> wrote:
>
> Send RPD mailing list submissions to
> rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> rpd-request at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> rpd-owner at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd-owner at afrinic.net>
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Assisted Registry Checks (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:48:23 +0200
> From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es
> <mailto:jordi.palet at consulintel.es>>
> To: <rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>
> Subject: Re: [rpd] Assisted Registry Checks
> Message-ID: <9D759EF6-DA60-4C87-9DB7-781565B65E81 at consulintel.es
> <mailto:9D759EF6-DA60-4C87-9DB7-781565B65E81 at consulintel.es>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Agree, however, by starting it, the community can see if there is
> an actual need for something else or not, or just provinding
> inputs to the "ARC" (whatever the staff calls it) process.
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
> @jordipalet
>
>
>
> ?El 25/6/19 1:27, "Dewole Ajao" <dewole at forum.org.ng
> <mailto:dewole at forum.org.ng>> escribi?:
>
> I should point out that my suggestion of the ARCs is a minimum
> that
> staff should be able to carry out starting now (with no big deal);
>
> It is not necessarily an alternative to the ongoing discussion on
> resource review.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dewole.
>
> On 6/24/2019 10:12 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
> > Hi Dewole,
> >
> > This is actually a good idea, and if I recall correctly, in
> the case of RIPE NCC, this was designed by the staff itself,
> looking for an objetive and fair process, and avoiding "flase
> claims" about possible competitors.
> >
> > https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-694
> >
> > You can see that this doesn't have the "random" bit of the
> review policy proposal, and still allows any member that has
> suspicius information about another member to tell the staff.
> >
> > The staff will then review that information, but the main
> difference is that if they feel the information is wrong, they
> aren't mandated to start a complete audit.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jordi
> > @jordipalet
> >
> >
> >
> > ?El 24/6/19 22:45, "Dewole Ajao" <dewole at forum.org.ng
> <mailto:dewole at forum.org.ng>> escribi?:
> >
> > [was Re: [rpd] Proposal Update received: Internet
> Number Resources
> > Review by AFRINIC]
> >
> > With the type of audit/review being discussed, the
> costs may vary
> > significantly from member to member - whether
> AFRINIC-side or Member-side.
> >
> > I have however in the past mentioned that RIPE NCC has
> something simple
> > and time-efficient called Assisted Registry Checks and
> if I remember
> > correctly, they aim to check records for every member
> once in two years.
> > While we await the audit/review/recovery policy, it
> would be nice to see
> > AFRINIC start to implement basic checks (even before a
> member comes for
> > a repeat allocation).
> >
> > See
> >
> https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-management/assisted-registry-check
> >
> >
> > These are simple checks to ensure registry accuracy and
> I see no reason
> > why anyone would try to discourage AFRINIC from
> checking the accuracy of
> > its records with the assistance of members.
> >
> > This first step we can all agree on and staff can
> implement almost
> > immediately (in addition to the work they are already
> doing when members
> > come to them with issues arising from our
> lame-delegations and
> > no-reverse-unless-assigned policies).
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dewole.
> >
> >
> > On 6/24/2019 7:20 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
> > > Hi Ish,
> > >
> > > I understand that, but my point is that there are two
> sides of the cost. And both should be considered:
> > >
> > > a) The cost for Afrinic (lets talk about average) for
> each review to an ISP.
> > >
> > > b) The cost for each member being reviewed (again we
> can get examples to calculate an average).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jordi
> > > @jordipalet
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ?El 24/6/19 20:00, "Ish Sookun"
> <ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu <mailto:ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu>>
> escribi?:
> > >
> > > I only requested an indicative value. I didn't
> ask to consider all
> > > possibilities (e.g litigation, big or small ISP
> etc). The idea is to
> > > obtain an approximate cost figure to evaluate
> whether the mere
> > > implementation of this policy brings a financial
> burden on AfriNIC.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Ish Sookun
> > >
> > > On 6/24/19 7:31 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD
> wrote:
> > > > I think there is one more cost to be
> considered here as well.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Each time an ISP gets the audit, it will need
> to dedicate staff for that.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It is dificult to calculate ?how much? that
> means, as it may depend on
> > > > many factors, such as how big is the ISP, how
> many resources they have,
> > > > how many customers from different types
> (business, residential), what
> > > > provisioning system they have, IPAM if any,
> level of ?automation? and
> > > > ?inventory? of the network, etc.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > May be it is a good exersice for some of you
> to calculate (rought idea),
> > > > how much staff/resources and how many weeks,
> this will take to you, if
> > > > the policy it is implemented?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > A few examples, could help the community to
> take a decision.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Jordi
> > > >
> > > > @jordipalet
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El 24/6/19 17:25, "Timothy Ola Akinfenwa"
> <akin.akinfenwa at uniosun.edu.ng <mailto:akin.akinfenwa at uniosun.edu.ng>
> > > > <mailto:akin.akinfenwa at uniosun.edu.ng
> <mailto:akin.akinfenwa at uniosun.edu.ng>>> escribi?:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello Andrew,
> > > >
> > > > While I also agree that Staff provide
> information on the likely
> > > > financial implication for the audit, I don't
> understand why there should
> > > > be a separate allocation for litigation.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Is it wise for an organisation to budget funds
> for likely court cases
> > > > when instead they should strive to prevent one
> in the first place?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > For me, I think it is critical to ensure that
> Staff actions on any audit
> > > > review does not amount to litigation. And this
> may be captured as a
> > > > suggestion in the policy as well, if necessary.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best!
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my OnePlus mobile device! </>$aa;
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, 3:53 PM Andrew Alston,
> > > > <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com
> <mailto:Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>
> > > > <mailto:Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com
> <mailto:Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I would agree that these numbers would be
> useful - and must in
> > > > addition include contingent liability
> allocation for litigation that
> > > > could result due to implementation of this
> policy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Liquid Telecommunications - Group Head Of
> IP Strategy
> > > >
> > > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > *From:*Ish Sookun
> <ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu <mailto:ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu>
> > > > <mailto:ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu
> <mailto:ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu>>>
> > > > *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2019 5:39:19 PM
> > > > *To:* rpd at afrinic.net
> <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net> <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net
> <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>
> > > > *Subject:* Re: [rpd] Proposal Update
> received: Internet Number
> > > > Resources Review by AFRINIC
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dear PDWG Co-Chairs,
> > > >
> > > > It was expressed during the last meeting
> that this policy will have
> > > > financial implications on AfriNIC due to
> costs associated to auditing.
> > > >
> > > > Is it possible to obtain an approximate
> cost figure (from staff) that
> > > > such audits would entail?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Ish Sookun
> > > >
> > > > On 6/8/19 10:24 PM, Dewole Ajao wrote:
> > > > > Dear PDWG members,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is to inform you that authors of
> the policy proposal named
> > > > "Internet Number Resources Review by
> AFRINIC" have submitted an
> > > > updated version (Draft version 8) as
> included below. The URL will be
> > > > shared once published online.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please take some time to go through the
> proposal contents and
> > > > provide your feedback.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you.
> > > > > PDWG Co-Chairs
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------- Begin
> > > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Name : Internet Number Resources
> Review by AFRINIC (Draft 8)
> > > > > Ref. Name: AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT08
> > > > > Status: Under Discussion
> > > > > Date: 7 June 2019
> > > > >
> > > > > Authors:
> > > > > (a) Amelina A. A. Arnaud |
> <arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg>
> > > > <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg
> <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg>>
> > > > > <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg
> <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg>
> > > > <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg
> <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg>>>> | AUF/TogoRER
> > > > > (b) Jean-Baptiste Millogo
> |<jean.millogo at orange.com <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com>
> > > > <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com
> <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com>>
> > > > > <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com
> <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com>
> > > > <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com
> <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com>>>>| Orange Burkina
> > > > > (c) Marcus ADOMEY
> <madomey at ug.edu.gh <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh>
> > > > <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh
> <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh>>
> > > > > <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh
> <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh> <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh
> <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh>>>> |
> > > > University of Ghana
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.0 Summary of the Problem Being
> Addressed by this Policy Proposal
> > > > >
> > > > > As Internet Number resources are finite,
> their allocation is based on
> > > > > the operational needs of end-users and
> Internet Services Providers,
> > > > > while avoiding stockpiling in accordance
> with RFC7020, IPv4 Allocation
> > > > > Policy CPM 5.5, IPv6 Allocation and
> assignment policy CPM 6.5 and
> > > > Policy
> > > > > for Autonomous System Numbers (ASN)
> Management in the AFRINIC
> > > > region CPM
> > > > > 7.0.Section 4 of the Registration
> Service Agreement (RSA) provides the
> > > > > framework for investigations of the
> usage of allocated Internet Number
> > > > > resources, defines members? obligation
> to cooperate and the
> > > > measures to
> > > > > be taken by AFRINIC in case of failure
> to comply. The lack of such
> > > > > investigation or regular control can
> lead to inefficient usage of the
> > > > > Internet Number resources, to
> stockpiling and other type of abuses.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.0.1 Summary of How this Proposal
> Addresses the Problem
> > > > >
> > > > > In order to ensure efficient and
> appropriate use of resources, AFRINIC
> > > > > shall conduct regular reviews of
> resource utilisation held by its
> > > > > members. This would allow recovery of
> any type of resource, where
> > > > usage
> > > > > is not in compliance with the RSA. Those
> resources can be reallocated
> > > > > for better usage.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.0.2 Proposal
> > > > >
> > > > > The policy proposal will modify the CPM
> as follows:
> > > > >
> > > > > Insert a section 13 to the CPM as follows:
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.0 Internet Number Resources Review
> > > > >
> > > > > Regular reviews of resource utilisation
> are conducted by AFRINIC to
> > > > > ensure efficient and appropriate usage
> of resources. This allows for
> > > > > recovery of any type of resource where
> usage is not in compliance with
> > > > > the RSA; to allow such resources to be
> reallocated for better usage.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.1 The reviews shall be based on
> compliance with the terms
> > > > outlined in
> > > > > the RSA and Allocation/Assignment Policies.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.2 The reviews cover all
> allocated/Assigned resources, but priority
> > > > > goes to IPv4 and ASN mappable to
> two-octet ASN.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.3 Classes of review: Members to be
> reviewed shall be selected
> > > > > according to the following classes:
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.3.1 Random
> > > > >
> > > > > The member is chosen by AFRINIC at
> random between the members who has
> > > > > not been reviewed for any other reasons
> in the preceding 24 months.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.3.2 Selected
> > > > >
> > > > > Member is selected because of an
> internal report or due to a lack of
> > > > > contact between the AFRINIC and the member.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.3.3 Reported:
> > > > >
> > > > > Here, members are reviewed either because:
> > > > >
> > > > > A) They have requested the review
> themselves or
> > > > >
> > > > > B) There has been a community complaint
> made against them that
> > > > warrants
> > > > > investigation. Complaints shall be
> backed by evidence and AFRINIC
> > > > staff
> > > > > shall evaluate the facts as appropriate
> to conduct the review. However
> > > > > this review is not applicable to a
> member with the same resources
> > > > > portfolio on which a full review has
> been completed in the
> > > > preceding 24
> > > > > months.
> > > > >
> > > > > AFRINIC staff may, at its sole
> discretion, after having assessed the
> > > > > nature of the evidence found in the
> community complaint, require that
> > > > > such evidence be (i) submitted in the
> form of a sworn affidavit or
> > > > (ii)
> > > > > declared to be true before a
> Commissioner of Oath.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.4 In case of non-compliance and if
> evidence has been established in
> > > > > accordance with:
> > > > >
> > > > > ? Breach of AFRINIC policies
> > > > > ? Breach of the provisions of the
> registration service agreement or
> > > > > other legal agreements between the
> organisation holding the
> > > > resource and
> > > > > AFRINIC.
> > > > >
> > > > > AFRNIC shall initiate the resource
> recovery process on the portion of
> > > > > addresses found to be noncompliant.
> > > > >
> > > > > A) AFRINIC shall attempt to contact the
> organisation and correct any
> > > > > discrepancy towards the RSA. Except in
> cases of fraudulent resource
> > > > > acquisition or unlawful usage and abuse,
> the organization shall be
> > > > > given a minimum of six(6) months to
> effect the return of the
> > > > resources.
> > > > >
> > > > > If the organisation is cooperative and
> working in good faith to
> > > > > substantially restore compliance or has
> a valid need for
> > > > additional time
> > > > > to renumber out of the affected blocks,
> AFRINIC shall negotiate a
> > > > longer
> > > > > term.
> > > > >
> > > > > The acceptance level of compliance and
> duration of the longer term are
> > > > > at AFRINIC staff discretion.
> > > > >
> > > > > B) If the situation cannot be rectified
> and the member did not
> > > > transfer
> > > > > the resources to meet other
> AFRINIC-approved needs as per adopted
> > > > policies
> > > > >
> > > > > AFRINIC shall publish the resources to
> be recovered for a period of
> > > > > three (3) months; during which the
> organisation may at any time, seek
> > > > > compliance or transfer the resources to
> other members
> > > > >
> > > > > After this period, the resource shall
> be recovered and therefore the
> > > > > records of the previous holder of the
> recovered resource shall be
> > > > > updated in AFRINIC?s databases.
> > > > >
> > > > > C) Any Internet Number Resources
> recovered under this policy may be
> > > > > assigned/allocated under existing
> Allocation and Assignment Policies.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.5 Appeal procedure
> > > > >
> > > > > Reviewed members who are not satisfied
> have the right to appeal
> > > > against
> > > > > the results on the review within the
> four weeks following
> > > > communication
> > > > > of the results by AFRINIC. Appeals shall
> follow an arbitration process
> > > > > as provided for in the
> > > > > Code de Procedure Civile (Code of Civil
> Procedure) of the Republic of
> > > > > Mauritius. AFRINIC may, on request from
> an aggrieved party, suggest a
> > > > > pool of arbitrators who shall be
> knowledgeable volunteers from the
> > > > > community.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.6 Compliance Report
> > > > >
> > > > > AFRINIC shall publish an annual
> meaningful report describing review
> > > > > activities, in accordance with all
> applicable laws and regulations.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.7 Acknowledgements
> > > > >
> > > > > The authors thank Ms Wafa Dahmani
> Zaafouri (become Afrinic GC
> > > > Chair), Mr
> > > > > Serge ILUNGA (become Afrinic Board
> member) and Mr Alain P. Aina for
> > > > > their contributions in the development
> of this Policy proposal.
> > > > >
> > > > > The authors also thank the community for
> the discussions and
> > > > contributions.
> > > > >
> > > > > 4.0 Revision History
> > > > >
> > > > > 18 May 2016
> > > > > Version 1.0
> > > > > - First Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT01
> > > > > - Posted on RPD list
> > > > >
> > > > > 05 Aug 2016
> > > > > Version 2.0
> > > > > - Second Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT02
> > > > > - Change on the policy?s name
> > > > > - Addition of the Acknowledgement section
> > > > > - Rephrasing of section 3.3.3
> > > > >
> > > > > 18 Nov 2016
> > > > > Version 3.0
> > > > > - Third Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT03
> > > > > - Update of section 3.3.3 from
> discussions on mailing list
> > > > > - Update of section 3.7
> (Acknowledgements) to thank the community for
> > > > > discussions and contributions
> > > > >
> > > > > 11 Apr 2017
> > > > > Version 4.0
> > > > > - Fourth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT04
> > > > > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.4
> > > > > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.5
> > > > > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.6
> > > > >
> > > > > 21 Oct. 2107
> > > > > Version 5.0
> > > > > - Fifth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT05
> > > > > - Adding the paragraph C to 13.3.3.
> according to the legal counsel
> > > > > proposition
> > > > > - Rephrasing the paragraph 13.5 to
> comply with staff and legal
> > > > assessment
> > > > > - Rephrasing the paragraph 13.6 to
> comply with staff assessment and
> > > > > avoid any ambiguity
> > > > > - Changing the co-authors list
> > > > > - Updating the Acknowledgement session
> > > > > - Amending 13.4 (B) to reflect the
> Transfer policies
> > > > >
> > > > > 06 Apr. 2018
> > > > > Version 6.0
> > > > > - Sixth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT06
> > > > > - Removing categorisation between
> membership in random class
> > > > section 13.3.1
> > > > >
> > > > > 06 Apr. 2019
> > > > > Version 07
> > > > > - Seventh Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT07
> > > > > - Modifying section 13.4 Paragraph A) to
> clarify the resources
> > > > recovery
> > > > > process: set conditions under which a
> member could be given
> > > > longer term
> > > > > to effect the return of affected
> resources.
> > > > >
> > > > > 29 may. 2019
> > > > > Version 08
> > > > > - Eighth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT08
> > > > > - Section 13.3.1 changes to : "..The
> member is chosen by AFRINIC at
> > > > > random between the members who has not
> been reviewed for any other
> > > > > reasons in the preceding 24 months."
> > > > > - Section 13.4 last paragraph changes
> to : "AFRINIC shall initiate
> > > > > ... on the portion of addresses found to
> be noncompliant."
> > > > > - Section 13.5 changes to ?Reviewed
> members who are not satisfied
> > > > > have the right to appeal against the
> results on the review within the
> > > > > four weeks following communication of
> the results by AFRINIC??..?
> > > > > - Typos and grammatical errors fixed.
> > > > >
> > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > End
> > > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > > RPD mailing list
> > > > > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>>
> > > > >
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > RPD mailing list
> > > > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>>
> > > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > RPD mailing list
> > > > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>>
> > > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> > > >
> > > >
> _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list
> > > > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > **********************************************
> > > > IPv4 is over
> > > > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> > > > http://www.theipv6company.com
> > > > The IPv6 Company
> > > >
> > > > This electronic message contains information
> which may be privileged or
> > > > confidential. The information is intended to
> be for the exclusive use of
> > > > the individual(s) named above and further
> non-explicilty authorized
> > > > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of
> the contents of this
> > > > information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly
> > > > prohibited and will be considered a criminal
> offense. If you are not the
> > > > intended recipient be aware that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution
> > > > or use of the contents of this information,
> even if partially, including
> > > > attached files, is strictly prohibited, will
> be considered a criminal
> > > > offense, so you must reply to the original
> sender to inform about this
> > > > communication and delete it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > RPD mailing list
> > > > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> > > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > RPD mailing list
> > > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > **********************************************
> > > IPv4 is over
> > > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> > > http://www.theipv6company.com
> > > The IPv6 Company
> > >
> > > This electronic message contains information which
> may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to
> be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and
> further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying,
> distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
> partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and
> will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended
> recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially,
> including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be
> considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original
> sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > RPD mailing list
> > > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > RPD mailing list
> > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > **********************************************
> > IPv4 is over
> > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> > http://www.theipv6company.com
> > The IPv6 Company
> >
> > This electronic message contains information which may be
> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for
> the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further
> non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use
> of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a
> criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents
> of this information, even if partially, including attached files,
> is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so
> you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > RPD mailing list
> > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be
> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for
> the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further
> non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use
> of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a
> criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents
> of this information, even if partially, including attached files,
> is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so
> you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of RPD Digest, Vol 153, Issue 184
> *************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/225da40e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ico-facebook.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1302 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/225da40e/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ico-twitter.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1423 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/225da40e/attachment-0006.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ico-linkedin.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1444 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/225da40e/attachment-0007.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ie.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3906 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/225da40e/attachment-0008.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ulsgroup.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 10458 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/225da40e/attachment-0009.jpg>
More information about the RPD
mailing list