<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Nasir,</p>
    <p>Definitely not "may run to court", "will run to court".</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-signature">
      <style type="text/css">
* { padding: 0px; margin: 0px; }
body, html { font-family: Arial, San-Serif; font-size: small; color: black; padding-left: 10px; padding-top: 3px; }
a { text-decoration: none; color: #818285; }
h1 { font-size: large; }
table { font-size: 12px; }
p + p { padding-top: 1em; }
</style>
      <p>Kind Regards,<br>
        <span style="font-size: 24px;color: #8dc641">Jaco Kroon</span>
        <br>
        <span style="font-size: 16px">C.E.O.</span></p>
      <table width="540" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td>
              <p><b>T:</b> +27 (0)12 021 0000 | <b>F:</b> +27 86 648
                8561 | <b>E:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jaco@iewc.co.za">jaco@iewc.co.za</a><br>
                <b>W:</b> <a href="http://www.iewc.co.za/">iewc.co.za</a>
                | <b>A:</b> Unit 201, Building 2B, Sunwood Park,
                Queen's Crescent Lynnwood, Pretoria</p>
            </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td style="" valign="middle" bgcolor="8dc641" align="left">
              <table style="font-size: 12px; font-family: Arial,
                sans-serif;" width="100%" cellspacing="0"
                cellpadding="0">
                <tbody>
                  <tr>
                    <td colspan="2" style="height: 5px;" height="5"><br>
                    </td>
                  </tr>
                  <tr>
                    <td width="10"> </td>
                    <td>
                      <p> <a style="display: inline-block;"
                          href="https://www.facebook.com/Interexcel/"><img
                            src="cid:part2.DFAC63C2.933D5762@uls.co.za"
                            alt="Facebook"></a> <a style="display:
                          inline-block;"
                          href="https://twitter.com/Interexcel/"><img
                            src="cid:part4.35BC3AE8.9019589B@uls.co.za"
                            alt="Twitter"></a> <a style="display:
                          inline-block;"
                          href="https://plus.google.com/+InterexcelCoZaPTA/posts"><img
                            src="cid:part6.6141B183.2E675CB3@uls.co.za"
                            alt="Google+"></a> <a style="display:
                          inline-block;"
                          href="http://www.linkedin.com/com/images/ico-linkedin.jpg"><img
                            src="cid:part6.6141B183.2E675CB3@uls.co.za"
                            alt="LinkedIn"></a> </p>
                    </td>
                  </tr>
                </tbody>
              </table>
            </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td colspan="3" valign="middle">
              <p><a href="http://www.iewc.co.za/"><img
                    src="cid:part10.F2AA8E83.92B37042@uls.co.za"
                    width="200" height="40"></a> <a
                  href="http://www.uls.co.za/" style="margin-left: 40px"><img
                    src="cid:part12.97D980C4.E3CFC022@uls.co.za"
                    width="136" height="53"></a></p>
            </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>
              <p style="font-size: 10px">This email and all contents are
                subject to the following disclaimer: <a
                  style="text-decoration: none; color: #8dc641;"
                  href="http://www.iewc.co.za/email-disclaimer/">View
                  Disclaimer</a></p>
            </td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2019/06/25 11:56, Nasir Faruk wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAB45wnmw+pNB=coeBMTMcuAjRv4-h7Wbkv4a_AL5v7Oeagq8cA@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div>
            <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
              data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div>
                  <div dir="ltr">
                    <div>
                      <div dir="ltr">
                        <div>
                          <div dir="ltr">
                            <div>
                              <div dir="ltr">
                                <div>
                                  <div>The ARC appears more useful as
                                    the scope is somehow narrower when
                                    compared to what was proposed in INR
                                    and this may eventually
                                    significantly reduce the financial
                                    implication for the audit. Even
                                    though, the financial implication as
                                    a result of litigation may still
                                    apply. The reason here, the ARC
                                    empowers the registry to either
                                    request for update from the member
                                    or terminate contractual agreement
                                    leading to the deregistration of
                                    their Internet number resources. Its
                                    very natural affected ISPs may run
                                    to court!<br>
                                  </div>
                                  <div><br>
                                  </div>
                                  <div>@Caleb,
                                    <p class="MsoNormal"
                                      style="margin:0in 0in
10pt;line-height:115%;font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Honestly,
                                      I don’t see implementing INR
                                      without litigation.
                                      Certainly, this will happen and I
                                      see it coming!</p>
                                    <p class="MsoNormal"
                                      style="margin:0in 0in
10pt;line-height:115%;font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Faruk<br>
                                    </p>
                                  </div>
                                  <div dir="ltr">
                                    <pre><span style="font-size:12.8px;font-family:arial,sans-serif;white-space:normal"><font color="#000000">..............................................................................................</font></span><span style="font-size:12.8px;font-family:arial,sans-serif;white-space:normal;color:rgb(0,0,255)">............</span>
</pre>
                                    <pre>
</pre>
                                    <pre><p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt 0.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:normal"><i><span style="color:rgb(17,17,17);font-family:"Arial Narrow","sans-serif";font-size:12pt"> </span></i></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">

</font></pre>
                                  </div>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
          <br>
        </div>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">
          <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 8:49
            AM <<a href="mailto:rpd-request@afrinic.net"
              moz-do-not-send="true">rpd-request@afrinic.net</a>>
            wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
            0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
            rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Send RPD mailing list
            submissions to<br>
                    <a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">rpd@afrinic.net</a><br>
            <br>
            To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
                    <a
              href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
            or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
                    <a href="mailto:rpd-request@afrinic.net"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">rpd-request@afrinic.net</a><br>
            <br>
            You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
                    <a href="mailto:rpd-owner@afrinic.net"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">rpd-owner@afrinic.net</a><br>
            <br>
            When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
            specific<br>
            than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            Today's Topics:<br>
            <br>
               1. Re: Assisted Registry Checks (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)<br>
            <br>
            <br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
            <br>
            Message: 1<br>
            Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:48:23 +0200<br>
            From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <<a
              href="mailto:jordi.palet@consulintel.es" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">jordi.palet@consulintel.es</a>><br>
            To: <<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">rpd@afrinic.net</a>><br>
            Subject: Re: [rpd] Assisted Registry Checks<br>
            Message-ID: <<a
              href="mailto:9D759EF6-DA60-4C87-9DB7-781565B65E81@consulintel.es"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">9D759EF6-DA60-4C87-9DB7-781565B65E81@consulintel.es</a>><br>
            Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="UTF-8"<br>
            <br>
            Agree, however, by starting it, the community can see if
            there is an actual need for something else or not, or just
            provinding inputs to the "ARC" (whatever the staff calls it)
            process.<br>
            <br>
            Regards,<br>
            Jordi<br>
            @jordipalet<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            ?El 25/6/19 1:27, "Dewole Ajao" <<a
              href="mailto:dewole@forum.org.ng" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">dewole@forum.org.ng</a>>
            escribi?:<br>
            <br>
                I should point out that my suggestion of the ARCs is a
            minimum that <br>
                staff should be able to carry out starting now (with no
            big deal);<br>
            <br>
                It is not necessarily an alternative to the ongoing
            discussion on <br>
                resource review.<br>
            <br>
                Regards,<br>
            <br>
                Dewole.<br>
            <br>
                On 6/24/2019 10:12 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD
            wrote:<br>
                > Hi Dewole,<br>
                ><br>
                > This is actually a good idea, and if I recall
            correctly, in the case of RIPE NCC, this was designed by the
            staff itself, looking for an objetive and fair process, and
            avoiding "flase claims" about possible competitors.<br>
                ><br>
                > <a
              href="https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-694"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-694</a><br>
                ><br>
                > You can see that this doesn't have the "random" bit
            of the review policy proposal, and still allows any member
            that has suspicius information about another member to tell
            the staff.<br>
                ><br>
                > The staff will then review that information, but
            the main difference is that if they feel the information is
            wrong, they aren't mandated to start a complete audit.<br>
                ><br>
                > Regards,<br>
                > Jordi<br>
                > @jordipalet<br>
                >   <br>
                >   <br>
                ><br>
                > ?El 24/6/19 22:45, "Dewole Ajao" <<a
              href="mailto:dewole@forum.org.ng" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">dewole@forum.org.ng</a>>
            escribi?:<br>
                ><br>
                >      [was Re: [rpd] Proposal Update received:
            Internet Number Resources<br>
                >      Review by AFRINIC]<br>
                >      <br>
                >      With the type of audit/review being discussed,
            the costs may vary<br>
                >      significantly from member to member - whether
            AFRINIC-side or Member-side.<br>
                >      <br>
                >      I have however in the past mentioned that RIPE
            NCC has something simple<br>
                >      and time-efficient called Assisted Registry
            Checks and if I remember<br>
                >      correctly, they aim to check records for every
            member once in two years.<br>
                >      While we await the audit/review/recovery
            policy, it would be nice to see<br>
                >      AFRINIC start to implement basic checks (even
            before a member comes for<br>
                >      a repeat allocation).<br>
                >      <br>
                >      See<br>
                >      <a
href="https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-management/assisted-registry-check"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-management/assisted-registry-check</a><br>
                >      <br>
                >      <br>
                >      These are simple checks to ensure registry
            accuracy and I see no reason<br>
                >      why anyone would try to discourage AFRINIC
            from checking the accuracy of<br>
                >      its records with the assistance of members.<br>
                >      <br>
                >      This first step we can all agree on and staff
            can implement almost<br>
                >      immediately (in addition to the work they are
            already doing when members<br>
                >      come to them with issues arising from our
            lame-delegations and<br>
                >      no-reverse-unless-assigned policies).<br>
                >      <br>
                >      Regards,<br>
                >      <br>
                >      Dewole.<br>
                >      <br>
                >      <br>
                >      On 6/24/2019 7:20 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via
            RPD wrote:<br>
                >      > Hi Ish,<br>
                >      ><br>
                >      > I understand that, but my point is that
            there are two sides of the cost. And both should be
            considered:<br>
                >      ><br>
                >      > a) The cost for Afrinic (lets talk about
            average) for each review to an ISP.<br>
                >      ><br>
                >      > b) The cost for each member being
            reviewed (again we can get examples to calculate an
            average).<br>
                >      ><br>
                >      > Regards,<br>
                >      > Jordi<br>
                >      > @jordipalet<br>
                >      ><br>
                >      ><br>
                >      ><br>
                >      > ?El 24/6/19 20:00, "Ish Sookun" <<a
              href="mailto:ish.sookun@lasentinelle.mu" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">ish.sookun@lasentinelle.mu</a>>
            escribi?:<br>
                >      ><br>
                >      >      I only requested an indicative
            value. I didn't ask to consider all<br>
                >      >      possibilities (e.g litigation, big
            or small ISP etc). The idea is to<br>
                >      >      obtain an approximate cost figure to
            evaluate whether the mere<br>
                >      >      implementation of this policy brings
            a financial burden on AfriNIC.<br>
                >      ><br>
                >      >      Regards,<br>
                >      ><br>
                >      >      Ish Sookun<br>
                >      ><br>
                >      >      On 6/24/19 7:31 PM, JORDI PALET
            MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:<br>
                >      >      > I think there is one more cost
            to be considered here as well.<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      > Each time an ISP gets the
            audit, it will need to dedicate staff for that.<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      > It is dificult to calculate
            ?how much? that means, as it may depend on<br>
                >      >      > many factors, such as how big
            is the ISP, how many resources they have,<br>
                >      >      > how many customers from
            different types (business, residential), what<br>
                >      >      > provisioning system they have,
            IPAM if any, level of ?automation? and<br>
                >      >      > ?inventory? of the network,
            etc.<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      > May be it is a good exersice
            for some of you to calculate (rought idea),<br>
                >      >      > how much staff/resources and
            how many weeks, this will take to you, if<br>
                >      >      > the policy it is implemented?<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      > A few examples, could help the
            community to take a decision.<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      > Regards,<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      > Jordi<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      > @jordipalet<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      > El 24/6/19 17:25, "Timothy Ola
            Akinfenwa" <<a
              href="mailto:akin.akinfenwa@uniosun.edu.ng"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">akin.akinfenwa@uniosun.edu.ng</a><br>
                >      >      > <mailto:<a
              href="mailto:akin.akinfenwa@uniosun.edu.ng"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">akin.akinfenwa@uniosun.edu.ng</a>>>
            escribi?:<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      > Hello Andrew,<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      > While I also agree that Staff
            provide information on the likely<br>
                >      >      > financial implication for the
            audit, I don't understand why there should<br>
                >      >      > be a separate allocation for
            litigation.<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      > Is it wise for an organisation
            to budget funds for likely court cases<br>
                >      >      > when instead they should strive
            to prevent one in the first place?<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      > For me, I think it is critical
            to ensure that Staff actions on any audit<br>
                >      >      > review does not amount to
            litigation. And this may be captured as a<br>
                >      >      > suggestion in the policy as
            well, if necessary.<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      > Best!<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      > Sent from my OnePlus mobile
            device! </>$aa;<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, 3:53 PM
            Andrew Alston,<br>
                >      >      > <<a
              href="mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com</a><br>
                >      >      > <mailto:<a
              href="mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com</a>>>
            wrote:<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      >     I would agree that these
            numbers would be useful - and must in<br>
                >      >      >     addition include contingent
            liability allocation for litigation that<br>
                >      >      >     could result due to
            implementation of this policy<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      >     Andrew<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      >     Liquid Telecommunications -
            Group Head Of IP Strategy<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      >   
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      >     *From:*Ish Sookun <<a
              href="mailto:ish.sookun@lasentinelle.mu" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">ish.sookun@lasentinelle.mu</a><br>
                >      >      >     <mailto:<a
              href="mailto:ish.sookun@lasentinelle.mu" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">ish.sookun@lasentinelle.mu</a>>><br>
                >      >      >     *Sent:* Monday, June 24,
            2019 5:39:19 PM<br>
                >      >      >     *To:* <a
              href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">rpd@afrinic.net</a> <mailto:<a
              href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">rpd@afrinic.net</a>><br>
                >      >      >     *Subject:* Re: [rpd]
            Proposal Update received: Internet Number<br>
                >      >      >     Resources Review by AFRINIC<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      >     Dear PDWG Co-Chairs,<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      >     It was expressed during the
            last meeting that this policy will have<br>
                >      >      >     financial implications on
            AfriNIC due to costs associated to auditing.<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      >     Is it possible to obtain an
            approximate cost figure (from staff) that<br>
                >      >      >     such audits would entail?<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      >     Regards,<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      >     Ish Sookun<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      >     On 6/8/19 10:24 PM, Dewole
            Ajao wrote:<br>
                >      >      >     > Dear PDWG members,<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > This is to inform you
            that authors of the policy proposal named<br>
                >      >      >     "Internet Number Resources
            Review by AFRINIC" have submitted an<br>
                >      >      >     updated version (Draft
            version 8) as included below. The URL will be<br>
                >      >      >     shared once published
            online.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > Please take some time
            to go through the proposal contents and<br>
                >      >      >     provide your feedback.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > Thank you.<br>
                >      >      >     > PDWG Co-Chairs<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     >
            ------------------------------------------------------------<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > -------------------
            Begin<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >   
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     >     Name : Internet
            Number Resources Review by AFRINIC (Draft 8)<br>
                >      >      >     >     Ref. Name:
            AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT08<br>
                >      >      >     >     Status: Under
            Discussion<br>
                >      >      >     >     Date: 7 June 2019<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > Authors:<br>
                >      >      >     >         (a) Amelina A.
            A. Arnaud | <<a href="mailto:arnaud.amelina@togorer.tg"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">arnaud.amelina@togorer.tg</a><br>
                >      >      >     <mailto:<a
              href="mailto:arnaud.amelina@togorer.tg" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">arnaud.amelina@togorer.tg</a>><br>
                >      >      >     > <mailto:<a
              href="mailto:arnaud.amelina@togorer.tg" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">arnaud.amelina@togorer.tg</a><br>
                >      >      >     <mailto:<a
              href="mailto:arnaud.amelina@togorer.tg" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">arnaud.amelina@togorer.tg</a>>>>
            | AUF/TogoRER<br>
                >      >      >     >         (b)
            Jean-Baptiste Millogo |<<a
              href="mailto:jean.millogo@orange.com" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">jean.millogo@orange.com</a><br>
                >      >      >     <mailto:<a
              href="mailto:jean.millogo@orange.com" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">jean.millogo@orange.com</a>><br>
                >      >      >     > <mailto:<a
              href="mailto:jean.millogo@orange.com" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">jean.millogo@orange.com</a><br>
                >      >      >     <mailto:<a
              href="mailto:jean.millogo@orange.com" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">jean.millogo@orange.com</a>>>>|
            Orange Burkina<br>
                >      >      >     >         (c) Marcus
            ADOMEY  <<a href="mailto:madomey@ug.edu.gh"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">madomey@ug.edu.gh</a><br>
                >      >      >     <mailto:<a
              href="mailto:madomey@ug.edu.gh" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">madomey@ug.edu.gh</a>><br>
                >      >      >     > <mailto:<a
              href="mailto:madomey@ug.edu.gh" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">madomey@ug.edu.gh</a> <mailto:<a
              href="mailto:madomey@ug.edu.gh" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">madomey@ug.edu.gh</a>>>> 
            |<br>
                >      >      >     University of Ghana<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 13.0 Summary of the
            Problem Being Addressed by this Policy Proposal<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > As Internet Number
            resources are finite, their allocation is based on<br>
                >      >      >     > the operational needs
            of end-users and Internet Services Providers,<br>
                >      >      >     > while avoiding
            stockpiling in accordance with RFC7020, IPv4 Allocation<br>
                >      >      >     > Policy CPM 5.5, IPv6
            Allocation and assignment policy CPM 6.5 and<br>
                >      >      >     Policy<br>
                >      >      >     > for Autonomous System
            Numbers (ASN) Management in the AFRINIC<br>
                >      >      >     region CPM<br>
                >      >      >     > 7.0.Section 4 of the
            Registration Service Agreement (RSA) provides the<br>
                >      >      >     > framework for
            investigations of the usage of allocated Internet Number<br>
                >      >      >     > resources, defines
            members? obligation to cooperate and the<br>
                >      >      >     measures to<br>
                >      >      >     > be taken by AFRINIC in
            case of failure to comply. The lack of such<br>
                >      >      >     > investigation or
            regular control can lead to inefficient usage of the<br>
                >      >      >     > Internet Number
            resources, to stockpiling and other type of abuses.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 13.0.1 Summary of How
            this Proposal Addresses the Problem<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > In order to ensure
            efficient and appropriate use of resources, AFRINIC<br>
                >      >      >     > shall conduct regular
            reviews of resource utilisation held by its<br>
                >      >      >     > members. This would
            allow recovery of any type of resource, where<br>
                >      >      >     usage<br>
                >      >      >     > is not in compliance
            with the RSA. Those resources can be reallocated<br>
                >      >      >     > for better usage.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 13.0.2 Proposal<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > The policy proposal
            will modify the CPM as follows:<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > Insert a section 13 to
            the CPM as follows:<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 13.0 Internet Number
            Resources Review<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > Regular reviews of
            resource utilisation are conducted by AFRINIC to<br>
                >      >      >     > ensure efficient and
            appropriate usage of resources. This allows for<br>
                >      >      >     > recovery of any type
            of resource where usage is not in compliance with<br>
                >      >      >     > the RSA; to allow such
            resources to be reallocated for better usage.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 13.1 The reviews shall
            be based on compliance with the terms<br>
                >      >      >     outlined in<br>
                >      >      >     > the RSA and
            Allocation/Assignment Policies.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 13.2 The reviews cover
            all allocated/Assigned resources, but priority<br>
                >      >      >     > goes to IPv4 and ASN
            mappable to two-octet ASN.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 13.3 Classes of
            review: Members to be reviewed shall be selected<br>
                >      >      >     > according to the
            following classes:<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 13.3.1 Random<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > The member is chosen
            by AFRINIC at random between the members who has<br>
                >      >      >     > not been reviewed for
            any other reasons in  the preceding 24 months.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 13.3.2 Selected<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     >  Member is selected
            because of an internal report or due to a lack of<br>
                >      >      >     > contact between the
            AFRINIC and the member.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 13.3.3 Reported:<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > Here, members are
            reviewed either because:<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > A) They have requested
            the review themselves or<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > B) There has been a
            community complaint made against them that<br>
                >      >      >     warrants<br>
                >      >      >     > investigation.
            Complaints shall be backed by evidence and AFRINIC<br>
                >      >      >     staff<br>
                >      >      >     > shall evaluate the
            facts as appropriate to conduct the review. However<br>
                >      >      >     > this review is not
            applicable to a member  with the same resources<br>
                >      >      >     > portfolio on which a
            full review has been completed in the<br>
                >      >      >     preceding 24<br>
                >      >      >     > months.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     >  AFRINIC staff may, at
            its sole discretion, after having assessed the<br>
                >      >      >     > nature of the evidence
            found in the community complaint, require that<br>
                >      >      >     > such evidence be (i)
            submitted in the form of a sworn affidavit or<br>
                >      >      >     (ii)<br>
                >      >      >     > declared to be true
            before a Commissioner of Oath.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 13.4 In case of
            non-compliance and if evidence has been established in<br>
                >      >      >     > accordance with:<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > ?    Breach of AFRINIC
            policies<br>
                >      >      >     > ?    Breach of the
            provisions of the registration service agreement or<br>
                >      >      >     > other legal agreements
            between the organisation holding the<br>
                >      >      >     resource and<br>
                >      >      >     > AFRINIC.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > AFRNIC shall initiate
            the resource recovery process on the portion of<br>
                >      >      >     > addresses found to be
            noncompliant.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > A) AFRINIC shall
            attempt to contact the organisation and correct any<br>
                >      >      >     > discrepancy towards
            the RSA. Except in cases of fraudulent resource<br>
                >      >      >     > acquisition or 
            unlawful usage and abuse, the organization shall be<br>
                >      >      >     > given a minimum of
            six(6) months to effect the return of the<br>
                >      >      >     resources.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > If the organisation is
            cooperative and working in good faith to<br>
                >      >      >     > substantially restore
            compliance or has a valid need for<br>
                >      >      >     additional time<br>
                >      >      >     > to renumber out of the
            affected blocks, AFRINIC shall negotiate a<br>
                >      >      >     longer<br>
                >      >      >     > term.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > The acceptance level
            of compliance and duration of the longer term are<br>
                >      >      >     > at AFRINIC staff
            discretion.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > B) If the situation
            cannot be rectified and the member did not<br>
                >      >      >     transfer<br>
                >      >      >     > the resources to meet
            other AFRINIC-approved needs as per adopted<br>
                >      >      >     policies<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     >  AFRINIC shall publish
            the resources to be recovered for a period of<br>
                >      >      >     > three (3) months;
            during which the organisation may at any time, seek<br>
                >      >      >     > compliance or transfer
            the resources to other members<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     >  After this period,
            the resource shall be recovered and therefore the<br>
                >      >      >     > records of the
            previous holder of the recovered resource shall be<br>
                >      >      >     > updated in AFRINIC?s
            databases.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > C)  Any Internet
            Number Resources recovered under this policy may be<br>
                >      >      >     > assigned/allocated
            under existing Allocation and Assignment Policies.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 13.5 Appeal procedure<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > Reviewed members who
            are not satisfied have the right to appeal<br>
                >      >      >     against<br>
                >      >      >     > the results on the
            review within the four weeks following<br>
                >      >      >     communication<br>
                >      >      >     > of the results by
            AFRINIC. Appeals shall follow an arbitration process<br>
                >      >      >     > as provided for in the<br>
                >      >      >     > Code de Procedure
            Civile (Code of Civil Procedure) of the Republic of<br>
                >      >      >     > Mauritius. AFRINIC
            may, on request from an aggrieved party, suggest a<br>
                >      >      >     > pool of arbitrators
            who shall be knowledgeable volunteers from the<br>
                >      >      >     > community.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 13.6 Compliance Report<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > AFRINIC shall publish
            an annual meaningful report describing review<br>
                >      >      >     > activities, in
            accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 13.7 Acknowledgements<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > The authors thank Ms
            Wafa Dahmani Zaafouri (become Afrinic GC<br>
                >      >      >     Chair), Mr<br>
                >      >      >     > Serge ILUNGA (become
            Afrinic Board member)  and Mr Alain P. Aina for<br>
                >      >      >     > their  contributions 
            in the development of this Policy proposal.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > The authors also thank
            the community for the discussions and<br>
                >      >      >     contributions.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 4.0 Revision History<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 18 May 2016<br>
                >      >      >     >   Version 1.0<br>
                >      >      >     > - First Draft
            AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT01<br>
                >      >      >     > - Posted on RPD list<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 05 Aug 2016<br>
                >      >      >     >   Version 2.0<br>
                >      >      >     > - Second Draft
            AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT02<br>
                >      >      >     > - Change on the
            policy?s name<br>
                >      >      >     > - Addition of the
            Acknowledgement section<br>
                >      >      >     > - Rephrasing of
            section 3.3.3<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 18 Nov 2016<br>
                >      >      >     > Version 3.0<br>
                >      >      >     > - Third Draft
            AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT03<br>
                >      >      >     > - Update of section
            3.3.3 from discussions on mailing list<br>
                >      >      >     > - Update of section
            3.7 (Acknowledgements) to thank the community for<br>
                >      >      >     > discussions and
            contributions<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 11 Apr 2017<br>
                >      >      >     > Version 4.0<br>
                >      >      >     > - Fourth Draft
            AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT04<br>
                >      >      >     > - Update and
            Rephrasing of section 3.4<br>
                >      >      >     > - Update and
            Rephrasing of section 3.5<br>
                >      >      >     > - Update and
            Rephrasing of section 3.6<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 21 Oct. 2107<br>
                >      >      >     > Version 5.0<br>
                >      >      >     > - Fifth Draft
            AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT05<br>
                >      >      >     > - Adding the paragraph
            C to 13.3.3. according to the legal counsel<br>
                >      >      >     > proposition<br>
                >      >      >     > - Rephrasing the
            paragraph 13.5 to comply with staff and legal<br>
                >      >      >     assessment<br>
                >      >      >     > - Rephrasing the
            paragraph 13.6 to comply with staff assessment and<br>
                >      >      >     > avoid any ambiguity<br>
                >      >      >     > - Changing the
            co-authors list<br>
                >      >      >     > - Updating the
            Acknowledgement session<br>
                >      >      >     > - Amending 13.4 (B)
            to  reflect the Transfer policies<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 06 Apr. 2018<br>
                >      >      >     > Version 6.0<br>
                >      >      >     > - Sixth Draft
            AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT06<br>
                >      >      >     > - Removing
            categorisation between membership in random class<br>
                >      >      >     section 13.3.1<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 06 Apr. 2019<br>
                >      >      >     > Version 07<br>
                >      >      >     > - Seventh Draft
            AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT07<br>
                >      >      >     > - Modifying section
            13.4 Paragraph A) to clarify the resources<br>
                >      >      >     recovery<br>
                >      >      >     > process: set
            conditions  under which a member could be given<br>
                >      >      >     longer term<br>
                >      >      >     >  to effect the return
            of  affected resources.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     > 29 may. 2019<br>
                >      >      >     > Version 08<br>
                >      >      >     > -  Eighth Draft
            AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT08<br>
                >      >      >     > -  Section 13.3.1
            changes to  : "..The member is chosen by AFRINIC at<br>
                >      >      >     > random between the
            members who has not been reviewed for any other<br>
                >      >      >     > reasons in  the
            preceding 24 months."<br>
                >      >      >     > -  Section  13.4  last
            paragraph changes to : "AFRINIC shall initiate<br>
                >      >      >     > ... on the portion of
            addresses found to be noncompliant."<br>
                >      >      >     > -   Section 13.5
            changes to  ?Reviewed members who are not satisfied<br>
                >      >      >     > have the right to
            appeal against the results on the review within the<br>
                >      >      >     > four weeks following
            communication of the results by AFRINIC??..?<br>
                >      >      >     > -  Typos and
            grammatical errors fixed.<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >   
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
                >      >      >     > End<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >   
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      >     >
            _______________________________________________<br>
                >      >      >     > RPD mailing list<br>
                >      >      >     > <a
              href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a> <mailto:<a
              href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>><br>
                >      >      >     > <a
              href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                >      >      >     ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      >   
             _______________________________________________<br>
                >      >      >     RPD mailing list<br>
                >      >      >     <a
              href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a> <mailto:<a
              href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>><br>
                >      >      >     <a
              href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      >   
             _______________________________________________<br>
                >      >      >     RPD mailing list<br>
                >      >      >     <a
              href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a> <mailto:<a
              href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>><br>
                >      >      >     <a
              href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      >
            _______________________________________________ RPD mailing
            list<br>
                >      >      > <a
              href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a> <a
              href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      >
            **********************************************<br>
                >      >      > IPv4 is over<br>
                >      >      > Are you ready for the new
            Internet ?<br>
                >      >      > <a
              href="http://www.theipv6company.com" rel="noreferrer"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.theipv6company.com</a><br>
                >      >      > The IPv6 Company<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      > This electronic message
            contains information which may be privileged or<br>
                >      >      > confidential. The information
            is intended to be for the exclusive use of<br>
                >      >      > the individual(s) named above
            and further non-explicilty authorized<br>
                >      >      > disclosure, copying,
            distribution or use of the contents of this<br>
                >      >      > information, even if partially,
            including attached files, is strictly<br>
                >      >      > prohibited and will be
            considered a criminal offense. If you are not the<br>
                >      >      > intended recipient be aware
            that any disclosure, copying, distribution<br>
                >      >      > or use of the contents of this
            information, even if partially, including<br>
                >      >      > attached files, is strictly
            prohibited, will be considered a criminal<br>
                >      >      > offense, so you must reply to
            the original sender to inform about this<br>
                >      >      > communication and delete it.<br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      >      >
            _______________________________________________<br>
                >      >      > RPD mailing list<br>
                >      >      > <a
              href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
                >      >      > <a
              href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                >      >      ><br>
                >      ><br>
                >      >     
            _______________________________________________<br>
                >      >      RPD mailing list<br>
                >      >      <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
                >      >      <a
              href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                >      ><br>
                >      ><br>
                >      ><br>
                >      ><br>
                >      >
            **********************************************<br>
                >      > IPv4 is over<br>
                >      > Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>
                >      > <a href="http://www.theipv6company.com"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.theipv6company.com</a><br>
                >      > The IPv6 Company<br>
                >      ><br>
                >      > This electronic message contains
            information which may be privileged or confidential. The
            information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the
            individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty
            authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the
            contents of this information, even if partially, including
            attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be
            considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended
            recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying,
            distribution or use of the contents of this information,
            even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
            prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you
            must reply to the original sender to inform about this
            communication and delete it.<br>
                >      ><br>
                >      ><br>
                >      ><br>
                >      ><br>
                >      >
            _______________________________________________<br>
                >      > RPD mailing list<br>
                >      > <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
                >      > <a
              href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                >      <br>
                >     
            _______________________________________________<br>
                >      RPD mailing list<br>
                >      <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
                >      <a
              href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                >      <br>
                ><br>
                ><br>
                ><br>
                > **********************************************<br>
                > IPv4 is over<br>
                > Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>
                > <a href="http://www.theipv6company.com"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.theipv6company.com</a><br>
                > The IPv6 Company<br>
                ><br>
                > This electronic message contains information which
            may be privileged or confidential. The information is
            intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s)
            named above and further non-explicilty authorized
            disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of
            this information, even if partially, including attached
            files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a
            criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be
            aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of
            the contents of this information, even if partially,
            including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be
            considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
            original sender to inform about this communication and
            delete it.<br>
                ><br>
                ><br>
                ><br>
                ><br>
                > _______________________________________________<br>
                > RPD mailing list<br>
                > <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
                > <a
              href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            **********************************************<br>
            IPv4 is over<br>
            Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>
            <a href="http://www.theipv6company.com" rel="noreferrer"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.theipv6company.com</a><br>
            The IPv6 Company<br>
            <br>
            This electronic message contains information which may be
            privileged or confidential. The information is intended to
            be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above
            and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying,
            distribution or use of the contents of this information,
            even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
            prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you
            are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure,
            copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
            information, even if partially, including attached files, is
            strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense,
            so you must reply to the original sender to inform about
            this communication and delete it.<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            ------------------------------<br>
            <br>
            Subject: Digest Footer<br>
            <br>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            RPD mailing list<br>
            <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
            <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
            <br>
            <br>
            ------------------------------<br>
            <br>
            End of RPD Digest, Vol 153, Issue 184<br>
            *************************************<br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>