Search RPD Archives
[rpd] ssisted Registry Checks
Nasir Faruk
nasirfaruk at gmail.com
Tue Jun 25 11:56:42 UTC 2019
Jaco,
Let me increase the bar then "would run to court" 😂 I tried as much to
run away from 100% probability. Just to give room for may be 1% likelyhood
that will not go to court.
Faruk.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019, 11:52 AM Jaco Kroon <jaco at uls.co.za> wrote:
> Nasir,
>
> Definitely not "may run to court", "will run to court".
>
>
> Kind Regards,
> Jaco Kroon
> C.E.O.
>
> *T:* +27 (0)12 021 0000 | *F:* +27 86 648 8561 | *E:* jaco at iewc.co.za
> *W:* iewc.co.za <http://www.iewc.co.za/> | *A:* Unit 201, Building 2B,
> Sunwood Park, Queen's Crescent Lynnwood, Pretoria
>
>
>
> [image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/Interexcel/> [image: Twitter]
> <https://twitter.com/Interexcel/> [image: Google+]
> <https://plus.google.com/+InterexcelCoZaPTA/posts> [image: LinkedIn]
> <http://www.linkedin.com/com/images/ico-linkedin.jpg>
>
> <http://www.iewc.co.za/> <http://www.uls.co.za/>
>
> This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer: View
> Disclaimer <http://www.iewc.co.za/email-disclaimer/>
> On 2019/06/25 11:56, Nasir Faruk wrote:
>
> The ARC appears more useful as the scope is somehow narrower when compared
> to what was proposed in INR and this may eventually significantly reduce
> the financial implication for the audit. Even though, the financial
> implication as a result of litigation may still apply. The reason here, the
> ARC empowers the registry to either request for update from the member or
> terminate contractual agreement leading to the deregistration of their
> Internet number resources. Its very natural affected ISPs may run to court!
>
> @Caleb,
>
> Honestly, I don’t see implementing INR without litigation. Certainly, this
> will happen and I see it coming!
>
> Faruk
>
> ..........................................................................................................
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 8:49 AM <rpd-request at afrinic.net> wrote:
>
>> Send RPD mailing list submissions to
>> rpd at afrinic.net
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> rpd-request at afrinic.net
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> rpd-owner at afrinic.net
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: Assisted Registry Checks (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:48:23 +0200
>> From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
>> To: <rpd at afrinic.net>
>> Subject: Re: [rpd] Assisted Registry Checks
>> Message-ID: <9D759EF6-DA60-4C87-9DB7-781565B65E81 at consulintel.es>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>>
>> Agree, however, by starting it, the community can see if there is an
>> actual need for something else or not, or just provinding inputs to the
>> "ARC" (whatever the staff calls it) process.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jordi
>> @jordipalet
>>
>>
>>
>> ?El 25/6/19 1:27, "Dewole Ajao" <dewole at forum.org.ng> escribi?:
>>
>> I should point out that my suggestion of the ARCs is a minimum that
>> staff should be able to carry out starting now (with no big deal);
>>
>> It is not necessarily an alternative to the ongoing discussion on
>> resource review.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dewole.
>>
>> On 6/24/2019 10:12 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
>> > Hi Dewole,
>> >
>> > This is actually a good idea, and if I recall correctly, in the
>> case of RIPE NCC, this was designed by the staff itself, looking for an
>> objetive and fair process, and avoiding "flase claims" about possible
>> competitors.
>> >
>> > https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-694
>> >
>> > You can see that this doesn't have the "random" bit of the review
>> policy proposal, and still allows any member that has suspicius information
>> about another member to tell the staff.
>> >
>> > The staff will then review that information, but the main
>> difference is that if they feel the information is wrong, they aren't
>> mandated to start a complete audit.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Jordi
>> > @jordipalet
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ?El 24/6/19 22:45, "Dewole Ajao" <dewole at forum.org.ng> escribi?:
>> >
>> > [was Re: [rpd] Proposal Update received: Internet Number
>> Resources
>> > Review by AFRINIC]
>> >
>> > With the type of audit/review being discussed, the costs may
>> vary
>> > significantly from member to member - whether AFRINIC-side or
>> Member-side.
>> >
>> > I have however in the past mentioned that RIPE NCC has
>> something simple
>> > and time-efficient called Assisted Registry Checks and if I
>> remember
>> > correctly, they aim to check records for every member once in
>> two years.
>> > While we await the audit/review/recovery policy, it would be
>> nice to see
>> > AFRINIC start to implement basic checks (even before a member
>> comes for
>> > a repeat allocation).
>> >
>> > See
>> >
>> https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-management/assisted-registry-check
>> >
>> >
>> > These are simple checks to ensure registry accuracy and I see
>> no reason
>> > why anyone would try to discourage AFRINIC from checking the
>> accuracy of
>> > its records with the assistance of members.
>> >
>> > This first step we can all agree on and staff can implement
>> almost
>> > immediately (in addition to the work they are already doing
>> when members
>> > come to them with issues arising from our lame-delegations and
>> > no-reverse-unless-assigned policies).
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Dewole.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 6/24/2019 7:20 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
>> > > Hi Ish,
>> > >
>> > > I understand that, but my point is that there are two sides
>> of the cost. And both should be considered:
>> > >
>> > > a) The cost for Afrinic (lets talk about average) for each
>> review to an ISP.
>> > >
>> > > b) The cost for each member being reviewed (again we can get
>> examples to calculate an average).
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Jordi
>> > > @jordipalet
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ?El 24/6/19 20:00, "Ish Sookun" <ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu>
>> escribi?:
>> > >
>> > > I only requested an indicative value. I didn't ask to
>> consider all
>> > > possibilities (e.g litigation, big or small ISP etc).
>> The idea is to
>> > > obtain an approximate cost figure to evaluate whether
>> the mere
>> > > implementation of this policy brings a financial burden
>> on AfriNIC.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > >
>> > > Ish Sookun
>> > >
>> > > On 6/24/19 7:31 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
>> > > > I think there is one more cost to be considered here
>> as well.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Each time an ISP gets the audit, it will need to
>> dedicate staff for that.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > It is dificult to calculate ?how much? that means, as
>> it may depend on
>> > > > many factors, such as how big is the ISP, how many
>> resources they have,
>> > > > how many customers from different types (business,
>> residential), what
>> > > > provisioning system they have, IPAM if any, level of
>> ?automation? and
>> > > > ?inventory? of the network, etc.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > May be it is a good exersice for some of you to
>> calculate (rought idea),
>> > > > how much staff/resources and how many weeks, this
>> will take to you, if
>> > > > the policy it is implemented?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > A few examples, could help the community to take a
>> decision.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > >
>> > > > Jordi
>> > > >
>> > > > @jordipalet
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > El 24/6/19 17:25, "Timothy Ola Akinfenwa" <
>> akin.akinfenwa at uniosun.edu.ng
>> > > > <mailto:akin.akinfenwa at uniosun.edu.ng>> escribi?:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Hello Andrew,
>> > > >
>> > > > While I also agree that Staff provide information on
>> the likely
>> > > > financial implication for the audit, I don't
>> understand why there should
>> > > > be a separate allocation for litigation.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Is it wise for an organisation to budget funds for
>> likely court cases
>> > > > when instead they should strive to prevent one in the
>> first place?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > For me, I think it is critical to ensure that Staff
>> actions on any audit
>> > > > review does not amount to litigation. And this may be
>> captured as a
>> > > > suggestion in the policy as well, if necessary.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Best!
>> > > >
>> > > > Sent from my OnePlus mobile device! </>$aa;
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, 3:53 PM Andrew Alston,
>> > > > <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com
>> > > > <mailto:Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > I would agree that these numbers would be useful
>> - and must in
>> > > > addition include contingent liability allocation
>> for litigation that
>> > > > could result due to implementation of this policy
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Andrew
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Liquid Telecommunications - Group Head Of IP
>> Strategy
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >
>> > > > *From:*Ish Sookun <ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu
>> > > > <mailto:ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu>>
>> > > > *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2019 5:39:19 PM
>> > > > *To:* rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>
>> > > > *Subject:* Re: [rpd] Proposal Update received:
>> Internet Number
>> > > > Resources Review by AFRINIC
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Dear PDWG Co-Chairs,
>> > > >
>> > > > It was expressed during the last meeting that
>> this policy will have
>> > > > financial implications on AfriNIC due to costs
>> associated to auditing.
>> > > >
>> > > > Is it possible to obtain an approximate cost
>> figure (from staff) that
>> > > > such audits would entail?
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > >
>> > > > Ish Sookun
>> > > >
>> > > > On 6/8/19 10:24 PM, Dewole Ajao wrote:
>> > > > > Dear PDWG members,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > This is to inform you that authors of the
>> policy proposal named
>> > > > "Internet Number Resources Review by AFRINIC"
>> have submitted an
>> > > > updated version (Draft version 8) as included
>> below. The URL will be
>> > > > shared once published online.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Please take some time to go through the
>> proposal contents and
>> > > > provide your feedback.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thank you.
>> > > > > PDWG Co-Chairs
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ------------------- Begin
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Name : Internet Number Resources Review by
>> AFRINIC (Draft 8)
>> > > > > Ref. Name: AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT08
>> > > > > Status: Under Discussion
>> > > > > Date: 7 June 2019
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Authors:
>> > > > > (a) Amelina A. A. Arnaud | <
>> arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg
>> > > > <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg>
>> > > > > <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg
>> > > > <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg>>> |
>> AUF/TogoRER
>> > > > > (b) Jean-Baptiste Millogo |<
>> jean.millogo at orange.com
>> > > > <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com>
>> > > > > <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com
>> > > > <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com>>>| Orange
>> Burkina
>> > > > > (c) Marcus ADOMEY <madomey at ug.edu.gh
>> > > > <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh>
>> > > > > <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh <mailto:
>> madomey at ug.edu.gh>>> |
>> > > > University of Ghana
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 13.0 Summary of the Problem Being Addressed by
>> this Policy Proposal
>> > > > >
>> > > > > As Internet Number resources are finite, their
>> allocation is based on
>> > > > > the operational needs of end-users and Internet
>> Services Providers,
>> > > > > while avoiding stockpiling in accordance with
>> RFC7020, IPv4 Allocation
>> > > > > Policy CPM 5.5, IPv6 Allocation and assignment
>> policy CPM 6.5 and
>> > > > Policy
>> > > > > for Autonomous System Numbers (ASN) Management
>> in the AFRINIC
>> > > > region CPM
>> > > > > 7.0.Section 4 of the Registration Service
>> Agreement (RSA) provides the
>> > > > > framework for investigations of the usage of
>> allocated Internet Number
>> > > > > resources, defines members? obligation to
>> cooperate and the
>> > > > measures to
>> > > > > be taken by AFRINIC in case of failure to
>> comply. The lack of such
>> > > > > investigation or regular control can lead to
>> inefficient usage of the
>> > > > > Internet Number resources, to stockpiling and
>> other type of abuses.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 13.0.1 Summary of How this Proposal Addresses
>> the Problem
>> > > > >
>> > > > > In order to ensure efficient and appropriate
>> use of resources, AFRINIC
>> > > > > shall conduct regular reviews of resource
>> utilisation held by its
>> > > > > members. This would allow recovery of any type
>> of resource, where
>> > > > usage
>> > > > > is not in compliance with the RSA. Those
>> resources can be reallocated
>> > > > > for better usage.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 13.0.2 Proposal
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The policy proposal will modify the CPM as
>> follows:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Insert a section 13 to the CPM as follows:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 13.0 Internet Number Resources Review
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regular reviews of resource utilisation are
>> conducted by AFRINIC to
>> > > > > ensure efficient and appropriate usage of
>> resources. This allows for
>> > > > > recovery of any type of resource where usage is
>> not in compliance with
>> > > > > the RSA; to allow such resources to be
>> reallocated for better usage.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 13.1 The reviews shall be based on compliance
>> with the terms
>> > > > outlined in
>> > > > > the RSA and Allocation/Assignment Policies.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 13.2 The reviews cover all allocated/Assigned
>> resources, but priority
>> > > > > goes to IPv4 and ASN mappable to two-octet ASN.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 13.3 Classes of review: Members to be reviewed
>> shall be selected
>> > > > > according to the following classes:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 13.3.1 Random
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The member is chosen by AFRINIC at random
>> between the members who has
>> > > > > not been reviewed for any other reasons in the
>> preceding 24 months.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 13.3.2 Selected
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Member is selected because of an internal
>> report or due to a lack of
>> > > > > contact between the AFRINIC and the member.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 13.3.3 Reported:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Here, members are reviewed either because:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > A) They have requested the review themselves or
>> > > > >
>> > > > > B) There has been a community complaint made
>> against them that
>> > > > warrants
>> > > > > investigation. Complaints shall be backed by
>> evidence and AFRINIC
>> > > > staff
>> > > > > shall evaluate the facts as appropriate to
>> conduct the review. However
>> > > > > this review is not applicable to a member with
>> the same resources
>> > > > > portfolio on which a full review has been
>> completed in the
>> > > > preceding 24
>> > > > > months.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > AFRINIC staff may, at its sole discretion,
>> after having assessed the
>> > > > > nature of the evidence found in the community
>> complaint, require that
>> > > > > such evidence be (i) submitted in the form of a
>> sworn affidavit or
>> > > > (ii)
>> > > > > declared to be true before a Commissioner of
>> Oath.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 13.4 In case of non-compliance and if evidence
>> has been established in
>> > > > > accordance with:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ? Breach of AFRINIC policies
>> > > > > ? Breach of the provisions of the
>> registration service agreement or
>> > > > > other legal agreements between the organisation
>> holding the
>> > > > resource and
>> > > > > AFRINIC.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > AFRNIC shall initiate the resource recovery
>> process on the portion of
>> > > > > addresses found to be noncompliant.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > A) AFRINIC shall attempt to contact the
>> organisation and correct any
>> > > > > discrepancy towards the RSA. Except in cases of
>> fraudulent resource
>> > > > > acquisition or unlawful usage and abuse, the
>> organization shall be
>> > > > > given a minimum of six(6) months to effect the
>> return of the
>> > > > resources.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > If the organisation is cooperative and working
>> in good faith to
>> > > > > substantially restore compliance or has a valid
>> need for
>> > > > additional time
>> > > > > to renumber out of the affected blocks, AFRINIC
>> shall negotiate a
>> > > > longer
>> > > > > term.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The acceptance level of compliance and duration
>> of the longer term are
>> > > > > at AFRINIC staff discretion.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > B) If the situation cannot be rectified and the
>> member did not
>> > > > transfer
>> > > > > the resources to meet other AFRINIC-approved
>> needs as per adopted
>> > > > policies
>> > > > >
>> > > > > AFRINIC shall publish the resources to be
>> recovered for a period of
>> > > > > three (3) months; during which the organisation
>> may at any time, seek
>> > > > > compliance or transfer the resources to other
>> members
>> > > > >
>> > > > > After this period, the resource shall be
>> recovered and therefore the
>> > > > > records of the previous holder of the recovered
>> resource shall be
>> > > > > updated in AFRINIC?s databases.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > C) Any Internet Number Resources recovered
>> under this policy may be
>> > > > > assigned/allocated under existing Allocation
>> and Assignment Policies.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 13.5 Appeal procedure
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Reviewed members who are not satisfied have the
>> right to appeal
>> > > > against
>> > > > > the results on the review within the four weeks
>> following
>> > > > communication
>> > > > > of the results by AFRINIC. Appeals shall follow
>> an arbitration process
>> > > > > as provided for in the
>> > > > > Code de Procedure Civile (Code of Civil
>> Procedure) of the Republic of
>> > > > > Mauritius. AFRINIC may, on request from an
>> aggrieved party, suggest a
>> > > > > pool of arbitrators who shall be knowledgeable
>> volunteers from the
>> > > > > community.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 13.6 Compliance Report
>> > > > >
>> > > > > AFRINIC shall publish an annual meaningful
>> report describing review
>> > > > > activities, in accordance with all applicable
>> laws and regulations.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 13.7 Acknowledgements
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The authors thank Ms Wafa Dahmani Zaafouri
>> (become Afrinic GC
>> > > > Chair), Mr
>> > > > > Serge ILUNGA (become Afrinic Board member) and
>> Mr Alain P. Aina for
>> > > > > their contributions in the development of
>> this Policy proposal.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The authors also thank the community for the
>> discussions and
>> > > > contributions.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 4.0 Revision History
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 18 May 2016
>> > > > > Version 1.0
>> > > > > - First Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT01
>> > > > > - Posted on RPD list
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 05 Aug 2016
>> > > > > Version 2.0
>> > > > > - Second Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT02
>> > > > > - Change on the policy?s name
>> > > > > - Addition of the Acknowledgement section
>> > > > > - Rephrasing of section 3.3.3
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 18 Nov 2016
>> > > > > Version 3.0
>> > > > > - Third Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT03
>> > > > > - Update of section 3.3.3 from discussions on
>> mailing list
>> > > > > - Update of section 3.7 (Acknowledgements) to
>> thank the community for
>> > > > > discussions and contributions
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 11 Apr 2017
>> > > > > Version 4.0
>> > > > > - Fourth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT04
>> > > > > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.4
>> > > > > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.5
>> > > > > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.6
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 21 Oct. 2107
>> > > > > Version 5.0
>> > > > > - Fifth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT05
>> > > > > - Adding the paragraph C to 13.3.3. according
>> to the legal counsel
>> > > > > proposition
>> > > > > - Rephrasing the paragraph 13.5 to comply with
>> staff and legal
>> > > > assessment
>> > > > > - Rephrasing the paragraph 13.6 to comply with
>> staff assessment and
>> > > > > avoid any ambiguity
>> > > > > - Changing the co-authors list
>> > > > > - Updating the Acknowledgement session
>> > > > > - Amending 13.4 (B) to reflect the Transfer
>> policies
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 06 Apr. 2018
>> > > > > Version 6.0
>> > > > > - Sixth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT06
>> > > > > - Removing categorisation between membership in
>> random class
>> > > > section 13.3.1
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 06 Apr. 2019
>> > > > > Version 07
>> > > > > - Seventh Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT07
>> > > > > - Modifying section 13.4 Paragraph A) to
>> clarify the resources
>> > > > recovery
>> > > > > process: set conditions under which a member
>> could be given
>> > > > longer term
>> > > > > to effect the return of affected resources.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 29 may. 2019
>> > > > > Version 08
>> > > > > - Eighth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT08
>> > > > > - Section 13.3.1 changes to : "..The member
>> is chosen by AFRINIC at
>> > > > > random between the members who has not been
>> reviewed for any other
>> > > > > reasons in the preceding 24 months."
>> > > > > - Section 13.4 last paragraph changes to :
>> "AFRINIC shall initiate
>> > > > > ... on the portion of addresses found to be
>> noncompliant."
>> > > > > - Section 13.5 changes to ?Reviewed members
>> who are not satisfied
>> > > > > have the right to appeal against the results on
>> the review within the
>> > > > > four weeks following communication of the
>> results by AFRINIC??..?
>> > > > > - Typos and grammatical errors fixed.
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > End
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > RPD mailing list
>> > > > > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>> > > > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > RPD mailing list
>> > > > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>> > > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > RPD mailing list
>> > > > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>> > > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________ RPD
>> mailing list
>> > > > RPD at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > **********************************************
>> > > > IPv4 is over
>> > > > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>> > > > http://www.theipv6company.com
>> > > > The IPv6 Company
>> > > >
>> > > > This electronic message contains information which
>> may be privileged or
>> > > > confidential. The information is intended to be for
>> the exclusive use of
>> > > > the individual(s) named above and further
>> non-explicilty authorized
>> > > > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the
>> contents of this
>> > > > information, even if partially, including attached
>> files, is strictly
>> > > > prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense.
>> If you are not the
>> > > > intended recipient be aware that any disclosure,
>> copying, distribution
>> > > > or use of the contents of this information, even if
>> partially, including
>> > > > attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be
>> considered a criminal
>> > > > offense, so you must reply to the original sender to
>> inform about this
>> > > > communication and delete it.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > RPD mailing list
>> > > > RPD at afrinic.net
>> > > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > RPD mailing list
>> > > RPD at afrinic.net
>> > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > **********************************************
>> > > IPv4 is over
>> > > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>> > > http://www.theipv6company.com
>> > > The IPv6 Company
>> > >
>> > > This electronic message contains information which may be
>> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the
>> exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty
>> authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
>> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
>> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
>> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
>> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
>> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
>> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
>> communication and delete it.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > RPD mailing list
>> > > RPD at afrinic.net
>> > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > RPD mailing list
>> > RPD at afrinic.net
>> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > **********************************************
>> > IPv4 is over
>> > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>> > http://www.theipv6company.com
>> > The IPv6 Company
>> >
>> > This electronic message contains information which may be
>> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the
>> exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty
>> authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
>> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
>> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
>> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
>> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
>> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
>> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
>> communication and delete it.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > RPD mailing list
>> > RPD at afrinic.net
>> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> **********************************************
>> IPv4 is over
>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>> http://www.theipv6company.com
>> The IPv6 Company
>>
>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
>> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
>> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
>> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
>> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
>> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
>> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
>> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
>> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
>> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
>> communication and delete it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RPD mailing list
>> RPD at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> End of RPD Digest, Vol 153, Issue 184
>> *************************************
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing listRPD at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/40269585/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ie.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3906 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/40269585/attachment-0001.jpg>
More information about the RPD
mailing list