Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] ssisted Registry Checks

Nasir Faruk nasirfaruk at gmail.com
Tue Jun 25 11:56:42 UTC 2019


Jaco,

Let me increase the bar then  "would run to court" 😂 I tried as much to
run away from 100% probability. Just to give room for may be 1% likelyhood
that will not go to court.

Faruk.




On Tue, Jun 25, 2019, 11:52 AM Jaco Kroon <jaco at uls.co.za> wrote:

> Nasir,
>
> Definitely not "may run to court", "will run to court".
>
>
> Kind Regards,
> Jaco Kroon
> C.E.O.
>
> *T:* +27 (0)12 021 0000 | *F:* +27 86 648 8561 | *E:* jaco at iewc.co.za
> *W:* iewc.co.za <http://www.iewc.co.za/> | *A:* Unit 201, Building 2B,
> Sunwood Park, Queen's Crescent Lynnwood, Pretoria
>
>
>
> [image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/Interexcel/> [image: Twitter]
> <https://twitter.com/Interexcel/> [image: Google+]
> <https://plus.google.com/+InterexcelCoZaPTA/posts> [image: LinkedIn]
> <http://www.linkedin.com/com/images/ico-linkedin.jpg>
>
> <http://www.iewc.co.za/> <http://www.uls.co.za/>
>
> This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer: View
> Disclaimer <http://www.iewc.co.za/email-disclaimer/>
> On 2019/06/25 11:56, Nasir Faruk wrote:
>
> The ARC appears more useful as the scope is somehow narrower when compared
> to what was proposed in INR and this may eventually significantly reduce
> the financial implication for the audit. Even though, the financial
> implication as a result of litigation may still apply. The reason here, the
> ARC empowers the registry to either request for update from the member or
> terminate contractual agreement leading to the deregistration of their
> Internet number resources. Its very natural affected ISPs may run to court!
>
> @Caleb,
>
> Honestly, I don’t see implementing INR without litigation. Certainly, this
> will happen and I see it coming!
>
> Faruk
>
> ..........................................................................................................
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 8:49 AM <rpd-request at afrinic.net> wrote:
>
>> Send RPD mailing list submissions to
>>         rpd at afrinic.net
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>         https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>         rpd-request at afrinic.net
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>         rpd-owner at afrinic.net
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Re: Assisted Registry Checks (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:48:23 +0200
>> From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
>> To: <rpd at afrinic.net>
>> Subject: Re: [rpd] Assisted Registry Checks
>> Message-ID: <9D759EF6-DA60-4C87-9DB7-781565B65E81 at consulintel.es>
>> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="UTF-8"
>>
>> Agree, however, by starting it, the community can see if there is an
>> actual need for something else or not, or just provinding inputs to the
>> "ARC" (whatever the staff calls it) process.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jordi
>> @jordipalet
>>
>>
>>
>> ?El 25/6/19 1:27, "Dewole Ajao" <dewole at forum.org.ng> escribi?:
>>
>>     I should point out that my suggestion of the ARCs is a minimum that
>>     staff should be able to carry out starting now (with no big deal);
>>
>>     It is not necessarily an alternative to the ongoing discussion on
>>     resource review.
>>
>>     Regards,
>>
>>     Dewole.
>>
>>     On 6/24/2019 10:12 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
>>     > Hi Dewole,
>>     >
>>     > This is actually a good idea, and if I recall correctly, in the
>> case of RIPE NCC, this was designed by the staff itself, looking for an
>> objetive and fair process, and avoiding "flase claims" about possible
>> competitors.
>>     >
>>     > https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-694
>>     >
>>     > You can see that this doesn't have the "random" bit of the review
>> policy proposal, and still allows any member that has suspicius information
>> about another member to tell the staff.
>>     >
>>     > The staff will then review that information, but the main
>> difference is that if they feel the information is wrong, they aren't
>> mandated to start a complete audit.
>>     >
>>     > Regards,
>>     > Jordi
>>     > @jordipalet
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > ?El 24/6/19 22:45, "Dewole Ajao" <dewole at forum.org.ng> escribi?:
>>     >
>>     >      [was Re: [rpd] Proposal Update received: Internet Number
>> Resources
>>     >      Review by AFRINIC]
>>     >
>>     >      With the type of audit/review being discussed, the costs may
>> vary
>>     >      significantly from member to member - whether AFRINIC-side or
>> Member-side.
>>     >
>>     >      I have however in the past mentioned that RIPE NCC has
>> something simple
>>     >      and time-efficient called Assisted Registry Checks and if I
>> remember
>>     >      correctly, they aim to check records for every member once in
>> two years.
>>     >      While we await the audit/review/recovery policy, it would be
>> nice to see
>>     >      AFRINIC start to implement basic checks (even before a member
>> comes for
>>     >      a repeat allocation).
>>     >
>>     >      See
>>     >
>> https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-management/assisted-registry-check
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >      These are simple checks to ensure registry accuracy and I see
>> no reason
>>     >      why anyone would try to discourage AFRINIC from checking the
>> accuracy of
>>     >      its records with the assistance of members.
>>     >
>>     >      This first step we can all agree on and staff can implement
>> almost
>>     >      immediately (in addition to the work they are already doing
>> when members
>>     >      come to them with issues arising from our lame-delegations and
>>     >      no-reverse-unless-assigned policies).
>>     >
>>     >      Regards,
>>     >
>>     >      Dewole.
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >      On 6/24/2019 7:20 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
>>     >      > Hi Ish,
>>     >      >
>>     >      > I understand that, but my point is that there are two sides
>> of the cost. And both should be considered:
>>     >      >
>>     >      > a) The cost for Afrinic (lets talk about average) for each
>> review to an ISP.
>>     >      >
>>     >      > b) The cost for each member being reviewed (again we can get
>> examples to calculate an average).
>>     >      >
>>     >      > Regards,
>>     >      > Jordi
>>     >      > @jordipalet
>>     >      >
>>     >      >
>>     >      >
>>     >      > ?El 24/6/19 20:00, "Ish Sookun" <ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu>
>> escribi?:
>>     >      >
>>     >      >      I only requested an indicative value. I didn't ask to
>> consider all
>>     >      >      possibilities (e.g litigation, big or small ISP etc).
>> The idea is to
>>     >      >      obtain an approximate cost figure to evaluate whether
>> the mere
>>     >      >      implementation of this policy brings a financial burden
>> on AfriNIC.
>>     >      >
>>     >      >      Regards,
>>     >      >
>>     >      >      Ish Sookun
>>     >      >
>>     >      >      On 6/24/19 7:31 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
>>     >      >      > I think there is one more cost to be considered here
>> as well.
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > Each time an ISP gets the audit, it will need to
>> dedicate staff for that.
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > It is dificult to calculate ?how much? that means, as
>> it may depend on
>>     >      >      > many factors, such as how big is the ISP, how many
>> resources they have,
>>     >      >      > how many customers from different types (business,
>> residential), what
>>     >      >      > provisioning system they have, IPAM if any, level of
>> ?automation? and
>>     >      >      > ?inventory? of the network, etc.
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > May be it is a good exersice for some of you to
>> calculate (rought idea),
>>     >      >      > how much staff/resources and how many weeks, this
>> will take to you, if
>>     >      >      > the policy it is implemented?
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > A few examples, could help the community to take a
>> decision.
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > Regards,
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > Jordi
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > @jordipalet
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > El 24/6/19 17:25, "Timothy Ola Akinfenwa" <
>> akin.akinfenwa at uniosun.edu.ng
>>     >      >      > <mailto:akin.akinfenwa at uniosun.edu.ng>> escribi?:
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > Hello Andrew,
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > While I also agree that Staff provide information on
>> the likely
>>     >      >      > financial implication for the audit, I don't
>> understand why there should
>>     >      >      > be a separate allocation for litigation.
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > Is it wise for an organisation to budget funds for
>> likely court cases
>>     >      >      > when instead they should strive to prevent one in the
>> first place?
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > For me, I think it is critical to ensure that Staff
>> actions on any audit
>>     >      >      > review does not amount to litigation. And this may be
>> captured as a
>>     >      >      > suggestion in the policy as well, if necessary.
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > Best!
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > Sent from my OnePlus mobile device! </>$aa;
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, 3:53 PM Andrew Alston,
>>     >      >      > <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com
>>     >      >      > <mailto:Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>> wrote:
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >     I would agree that these numbers would be useful
>> - and must in
>>     >      >      >     addition include contingent liability allocation
>> for litigation that
>>     >      >      >     could result due to implementation of this policy
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >     Andrew
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >     Liquid Telecommunications - Group Head Of IP
>> Strategy
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >     *From:*Ish Sookun <ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu
>>     >      >      >     <mailto:ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu>>
>>     >      >      >     *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2019 5:39:19 PM
>>     >      >      >     *To:* rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>
>>     >      >      >     *Subject:* Re: [rpd] Proposal Update received:
>> Internet Number
>>     >      >      >     Resources Review by AFRINIC
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >     Dear PDWG Co-Chairs,
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >     It was expressed during the last meeting that
>> this policy will have
>>     >      >      >     financial implications on AfriNIC due to costs
>> associated to auditing.
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >     Is it possible to obtain an approximate cost
>> figure (from staff) that
>>     >      >      >     such audits would entail?
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >     Regards,
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >     Ish Sookun
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >     On 6/8/19 10:24 PM, Dewole Ajao wrote:
>>     >      >      >     > Dear PDWG members,
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > This is to inform you that authors of the
>> policy proposal named
>>     >      >      >     "Internet Number Resources Review by AFRINIC"
>> have submitted an
>>     >      >      >     updated version (Draft version 8) as included
>> below. The URL will be
>>     >      >      >     shared once published online.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > Please take some time to go through the
>> proposal contents and
>>     >      >      >     provide your feedback.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > Thank you.
>>     >      >      >     > PDWG Co-Chairs
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > ------------------- Begin
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >
>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     >     Name : Internet Number Resources Review by
>> AFRINIC (Draft 8)
>>     >      >      >     >     Ref. Name: AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT08
>>     >      >      >     >     Status: Under Discussion
>>     >      >      >     >     Date: 7 June 2019
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > Authors:
>>     >      >      >     >         (a) Amelina A. A. Arnaud | <
>> arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg
>>     >      >      >     <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg>
>>     >      >      >     > <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg
>>     >      >      >     <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg>>> |
>> AUF/TogoRER
>>     >      >      >     >         (b) Jean-Baptiste Millogo |<
>> jean.millogo at orange.com
>>     >      >      >     <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com>
>>     >      >      >     > <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com
>>     >      >      >     <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com>>>| Orange
>> Burkina
>>     >      >      >     >         (c) Marcus ADOMEY  <madomey at ug.edu.gh
>>     >      >      >     <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh>
>>     >      >      >     > <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh <mailto:
>> madomey at ug.edu.gh>>>  |
>>     >      >      >     University of Ghana
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 13.0 Summary of the Problem Being Addressed by
>> this Policy Proposal
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > As Internet Number resources are finite, their
>> allocation is based on
>>     >      >      >     > the operational needs of end-users and Internet
>> Services Providers,
>>     >      >      >     > while avoiding stockpiling in accordance with
>> RFC7020, IPv4 Allocation
>>     >      >      >     > Policy CPM 5.5, IPv6 Allocation and assignment
>> policy CPM 6.5 and
>>     >      >      >     Policy
>>     >      >      >     > for Autonomous System Numbers (ASN) Management
>> in the AFRINIC
>>     >      >      >     region CPM
>>     >      >      >     > 7.0.Section 4 of the Registration Service
>> Agreement (RSA) provides the
>>     >      >      >     > framework for investigations of the usage of
>> allocated Internet Number
>>     >      >      >     > resources, defines members? obligation to
>> cooperate and the
>>     >      >      >     measures to
>>     >      >      >     > be taken by AFRINIC in case of failure to
>> comply. The lack of such
>>     >      >      >     > investigation or regular control can lead to
>> inefficient usage of the
>>     >      >      >     > Internet Number resources, to stockpiling and
>> other type of abuses.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 13.0.1 Summary of How this Proposal Addresses
>> the Problem
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > In order to ensure efficient and appropriate
>> use of resources, AFRINIC
>>     >      >      >     > shall conduct regular reviews of resource
>> utilisation held by its
>>     >      >      >     > members. This would allow recovery of any type
>> of resource, where
>>     >      >      >     usage
>>     >      >      >     > is not in compliance with the RSA. Those
>> resources can be reallocated
>>     >      >      >     > for better usage.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 13.0.2 Proposal
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > The policy proposal will modify the CPM as
>> follows:
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > Insert a section 13 to the CPM as follows:
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 13.0 Internet Number Resources Review
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > Regular reviews of resource utilisation are
>> conducted by AFRINIC to
>>     >      >      >     > ensure efficient and appropriate usage of
>> resources. This allows for
>>     >      >      >     > recovery of any type of resource where usage is
>> not in compliance with
>>     >      >      >     > the RSA; to allow such resources to be
>> reallocated for better usage.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 13.1 The reviews shall be based on compliance
>> with the terms
>>     >      >      >     outlined in
>>     >      >      >     > the RSA and Allocation/Assignment Policies.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 13.2 The reviews cover all allocated/Assigned
>> resources, but priority
>>     >      >      >     > goes to IPv4 and ASN mappable to two-octet ASN.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 13.3 Classes of review: Members to be reviewed
>> shall be selected
>>     >      >      >     > according to the following classes:
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 13.3.1 Random
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > The member is chosen by AFRINIC at random
>> between the members who has
>>     >      >      >     > not been reviewed for any other reasons in  the
>> preceding 24 months.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 13.3.2 Selected
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     >  Member is selected because of an internal
>> report or due to a lack of
>>     >      >      >     > contact between the AFRINIC and the member.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 13.3.3 Reported:
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > Here, members are reviewed either because:
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > A) They have requested the review themselves or
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > B) There has been a community complaint made
>> against them that
>>     >      >      >     warrants
>>     >      >      >     > investigation. Complaints shall be backed by
>> evidence and AFRINIC
>>     >      >      >     staff
>>     >      >      >     > shall evaluate the facts as appropriate to
>> conduct the review. However
>>     >      >      >     > this review is not applicable to a member  with
>> the same resources
>>     >      >      >     > portfolio on which a full review has been
>> completed in the
>>     >      >      >     preceding 24
>>     >      >      >     > months.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     >  AFRINIC staff may, at its sole discretion,
>> after having assessed the
>>     >      >      >     > nature of the evidence found in the community
>> complaint, require that
>>     >      >      >     > such evidence be (i) submitted in the form of a
>> sworn affidavit or
>>     >      >      >     (ii)
>>     >      >      >     > declared to be true before a Commissioner of
>> Oath.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 13.4 In case of non-compliance and if evidence
>> has been established in
>>     >      >      >     > accordance with:
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > ?    Breach of AFRINIC policies
>>     >      >      >     > ?    Breach of the provisions of the
>> registration service agreement or
>>     >      >      >     > other legal agreements between the organisation
>> holding the
>>     >      >      >     resource and
>>     >      >      >     > AFRINIC.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > AFRNIC shall initiate the resource recovery
>> process on the portion of
>>     >      >      >     > addresses found to be noncompliant.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > A) AFRINIC shall attempt to contact the
>> organisation and correct any
>>     >      >      >     > discrepancy towards the RSA. Except in cases of
>> fraudulent resource
>>     >      >      >     > acquisition or  unlawful usage and abuse, the
>> organization shall be
>>     >      >      >     > given a minimum of six(6) months to effect the
>> return of the
>>     >      >      >     resources.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > If the organisation is cooperative and working
>> in good faith to
>>     >      >      >     > substantially restore compliance or has a valid
>> need for
>>     >      >      >     additional time
>>     >      >      >     > to renumber out of the affected blocks, AFRINIC
>> shall negotiate a
>>     >      >      >     longer
>>     >      >      >     > term.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > The acceptance level of compliance and duration
>> of the longer term are
>>     >      >      >     > at AFRINIC staff discretion.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > B) If the situation cannot be rectified and the
>> member did not
>>     >      >      >     transfer
>>     >      >      >     > the resources to meet other AFRINIC-approved
>> needs as per adopted
>>     >      >      >     policies
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     >  AFRINIC shall publish the resources to be
>> recovered for a period of
>>     >      >      >     > three (3) months; during which the organisation
>> may at any time, seek
>>     >      >      >     > compliance or transfer the resources to other
>> members
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     >  After this period, the resource shall be
>> recovered and therefore the
>>     >      >      >     > records of the previous holder of the recovered
>> resource shall be
>>     >      >      >     > updated in AFRINIC?s databases.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > C)  Any Internet Number Resources recovered
>> under this policy may be
>>     >      >      >     > assigned/allocated under existing Allocation
>> and Assignment Policies.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 13.5 Appeal procedure
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > Reviewed members who are not satisfied have the
>> right to appeal
>>     >      >      >     against
>>     >      >      >     > the results on the review within the four weeks
>> following
>>     >      >      >     communication
>>     >      >      >     > of the results by AFRINIC. Appeals shall follow
>> an arbitration process
>>     >      >      >     > as provided for in the
>>     >      >      >     > Code de Procedure Civile (Code of Civil
>> Procedure) of the Republic of
>>     >      >      >     > Mauritius. AFRINIC may, on request from an
>> aggrieved party, suggest a
>>     >      >      >     > pool of arbitrators who shall be knowledgeable
>> volunteers from the
>>     >      >      >     > community.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 13.6 Compliance Report
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > AFRINIC shall publish an annual meaningful
>> report describing review
>>     >      >      >     > activities, in accordance with all applicable
>> laws and regulations.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 13.7 Acknowledgements
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > The authors thank Ms Wafa Dahmani Zaafouri
>> (become Afrinic GC
>>     >      >      >     Chair), Mr
>>     >      >      >     > Serge ILUNGA (become Afrinic Board member)  and
>> Mr Alain P. Aina for
>>     >      >      >     > their  contributions  in the development of
>> this Policy proposal.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > The authors also thank the community for the
>> discussions and
>>     >      >      >     contributions.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 4.0 Revision History
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 18 May 2016
>>     >      >      >     >   Version 1.0
>>     >      >      >     > - First Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT01
>>     >      >      >     > - Posted on RPD list
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 05 Aug 2016
>>     >      >      >     >   Version 2.0
>>     >      >      >     > - Second Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT02
>>     >      >      >     > - Change on the policy?s name
>>     >      >      >     > - Addition of the Acknowledgement section
>>     >      >      >     > - Rephrasing of section 3.3.3
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 18 Nov 2016
>>     >      >      >     > Version 3.0
>>     >      >      >     > - Third Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT03
>>     >      >      >     > - Update of section 3.3.3 from discussions on
>> mailing list
>>     >      >      >     > - Update of section 3.7 (Acknowledgements) to
>> thank the community for
>>     >      >      >     > discussions and contributions
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 11 Apr 2017
>>     >      >      >     > Version 4.0
>>     >      >      >     > - Fourth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT04
>>     >      >      >     > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.4
>>     >      >      >     > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.5
>>     >      >      >     > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.6
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 21 Oct. 2107
>>     >      >      >     > Version 5.0
>>     >      >      >     > - Fifth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT05
>>     >      >      >     > - Adding the paragraph C to 13.3.3. according
>> to the legal counsel
>>     >      >      >     > proposition
>>     >      >      >     > - Rephrasing the paragraph 13.5 to comply with
>> staff and legal
>>     >      >      >     assessment
>>     >      >      >     > - Rephrasing the paragraph 13.6 to comply with
>> staff assessment and
>>     >      >      >     > avoid any ambiguity
>>     >      >      >     > - Changing the co-authors list
>>     >      >      >     > - Updating the Acknowledgement session
>>     >      >      >     > - Amending 13.4 (B) to  reflect the Transfer
>> policies
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 06 Apr. 2018
>>     >      >      >     > Version 6.0
>>     >      >      >     > - Sixth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT06
>>     >      >      >     > - Removing categorisation between membership in
>> random class
>>     >      >      >     section 13.3.1
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 06 Apr. 2019
>>     >      >      >     > Version 07
>>     >      >      >     > - Seventh Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT07
>>     >      >      >     > - Modifying section 13.4 Paragraph A) to
>> clarify the resources
>>     >      >      >     recovery
>>     >      >      >     > process: set conditions  under which a member
>> could be given
>>     >      >      >     longer term
>>     >      >      >     >  to effect the return of  affected resources.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > 29 may. 2019
>>     >      >      >     > Version 08
>>     >      >      >     > -  Eighth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT08
>>     >      >      >     > -  Section 13.3.1 changes to  : "..The member
>> is chosen by AFRINIC at
>>     >      >      >     > random between the members who has not been
>> reviewed for any other
>>     >      >      >     > reasons in  the preceding 24 months."
>>     >      >      >     > -  Section  13.4  last paragraph changes to :
>> "AFRINIC shall initiate
>>     >      >      >     > ... on the portion of addresses found to be
>> noncompliant."
>>     >      >      >     > -   Section 13.5 changes to  ?Reviewed members
>> who are not satisfied
>>     >      >      >     > have the right to appeal against the results on
>> the review within the
>>     >      >      >     > four weeks following communication of the
>> results by AFRINIC??..?
>>     >      >      >     > -  Typos and grammatical errors fixed.
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >
>>  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     >      >      >     > End
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >
>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >     > _______________________________________________
>>     >      >      >     > RPD mailing list
>>     >      >      >     > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>>     >      >      >     > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>     >      >      >     >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >     _______________________________________________
>>     >      >      >     RPD mailing list
>>     >      >      >     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>>     >      >      >     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >     _______________________________________________
>>     >      >      >     RPD mailing list
>>     >      >      >     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>>     >      >      >     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > _______________________________________________ RPD
>> mailing list
>>     >      >      > RPD at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > **********************************************
>>     >      >      > IPv4 is over
>>     >      >      > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>>     >      >      > http://www.theipv6company.com
>>     >      >      > The IPv6 Company
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > This electronic message contains information which
>> may be privileged or
>>     >      >      > confidential. The information is intended to be for
>> the exclusive use of
>>     >      >      > the individual(s) named above and further
>> non-explicilty authorized
>>     >      >      > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the
>> contents of this
>>     >      >      > information, even if partially, including attached
>> files, is strictly
>>     >      >      > prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense.
>> If you are not the
>>     >      >      > intended recipient be aware that any disclosure,
>> copying, distribution
>>     >      >      > or use of the contents of this information, even if
>> partially, including
>>     >      >      > attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be
>> considered a criminal
>>     >      >      > offense, so you must reply to the original sender to
>> inform about this
>>     >      >      > communication and delete it.
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >      > _______________________________________________
>>     >      >      > RPD mailing list
>>     >      >      > RPD at afrinic.net
>>     >      >      > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>     >      >      >
>>     >      >
>>     >      >      _______________________________________________
>>     >      >      RPD mailing list
>>     >      >      RPD at afrinic.net
>>     >      >      https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>     >      >
>>     >      >
>>     >      >
>>     >      >
>>     >      > **********************************************
>>     >      > IPv4 is over
>>     >      > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>>     >      > http://www.theipv6company.com
>>     >      > The IPv6 Company
>>     >      >
>>     >      > This electronic message contains information which may be
>> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the
>> exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty
>> authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
>> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
>> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
>> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
>> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
>> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
>> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
>> communication and delete it.
>>     >      >
>>     >      >
>>     >      >
>>     >      >
>>     >      > _______________________________________________
>>     >      > RPD mailing list
>>     >      > RPD at afrinic.net
>>     >      > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>     >
>>     >      _______________________________________________
>>     >      RPD mailing list
>>     >      RPD at afrinic.net
>>     >      https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > **********************************************
>>     > IPv4 is over
>>     > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>>     > http://www.theipv6company.com
>>     > The IPv6 Company
>>     >
>>     > This electronic message contains information which may be
>> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the
>> exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty
>> authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
>> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
>> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
>> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
>> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
>> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
>> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
>> communication and delete it.
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > _______________________________________________
>>     > RPD mailing list
>>     > RPD at afrinic.net
>>     > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> **********************************************
>> IPv4 is over
>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>> http://www.theipv6company.com
>> The IPv6 Company
>>
>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
>> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
>> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
>> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
>> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
>> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
>> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
>> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
>> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
>> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
>> communication and delete it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RPD mailing list
>> RPD at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> End of RPD Digest, Vol 153, Issue 184
>> *************************************
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing listRPD at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/40269585/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ie.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3906 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/40269585/attachment-0001.jpg>


More information about the RPD mailing list