Search RPD Archives
[rpd] IPV4 inter-RIR Legacy Resources Transfer
Emem William
dwizard65 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 18 09:23:56 UTC 2019
Dear all,
Jordie and Mark has giving all the points. There is no need for me to
repeat them.
Afrinic is the only region left out cos we are sometimes slow.
I totally agree with this policy and I believe it should get approved here
in Uganda.
Thanks
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019, 09:49 <rpd-request at afrinic.net wrote:
> Send RPD mailing list submissions to
> rpd at afrinic.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> rpd-request at afrinic.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> rpd-owner at afrinic.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: inputs on IPv4 Inter-RIR policy proposals - AFRINIC needs
> this policy now! (Pascal ANDRIANISA)
> 2. Re: IPV4 inter-RIR Legacy Resources Transfer. (aleruchi chuku)
> 3. Re: IPV4 inter-RIR Legacy Resources Transfer. (Kris Seeburn)
> 4. Re: IPV4 inter-RIR Legacy Resources Transfer
> (Hussein Olanrewaju AKANDE)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:48:06 +0300 (EAT)
> From: Pascal ANDRIANISA <pascal at irenala.edu.mg>
> To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
> Cc: rpd <rpd at afrinic.net>
> Subject: Re: [rpd] inputs on IPv4 Inter-RIR policy proposals - AFRINIC
> needs this policy now!
> Message-ID:
> <2084202978.190352.1560844086975.JavaMail.zimbra at irenala.edu.mg>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Hi Jordi,
> I read the policy proposal for IPV4 Inter-RIR Transfert.
> The article =>
> https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-002-d1#proposal
> I think this is not the benefit of AFRINIC as resources are currently
> insufficient for AFRINIC.
> Otherwise it is necessary to balance the transfers between RIR because at
> least the number of resources is limited to sending to other RIRs.
>
> I do not support this policy for this reason, The AFRINIC's resources are
> not enough for AFRICA, why transfer them elsewhere ....
>
> Pascal Heriliva ANDRIANISA
> Webmaster i RENALA
> R esearch and E ducation N etwork for A cademic and L earning A ctivities
> - [ http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ | http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ ]
> Porte 201 - Minist?re de l'Enseignement Sup?rieur et de la Recherche
> Scientifique - Fiadanana
> GSM :+261 (0) 32 46 680 29 | +261 (0) 34 30 680 29
>
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "rpd" <rpd at afrinic.net>
> ?: "rpd" <rpd at afrinic.net>
> Envoy?: Samedi 15 Juin 2019 13:23:23
> Objet: [rpd] inputs on IPv4 Inter-RIR policy proposals - AFRINIC needs
> this policy now!
>
> Hi all,
>
> I wonder if anyone has inputs on the policy proposals for IPv4 Inter-RIR
> transfers.
>
> https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-001-d1
>
> and
>
> https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-002-d1
>
> I will be presenting both of them together on Wednesday 19th. If you're
> not in Kampala, make sure to participate remotely (
> https://www.internetsummit.africa/en/participate-remotely), so we can
> resolve any doubts on the spot.
>
> This is a key issue for AFRINIC, which now is the *only* RIR not allowing
> those transfers.
>
> AFRINIC is soon (probably around end of this year) entering in exhaustion
> phase 2, so it will become more and more difficult to obtain IPv4. If
> transfers from other regions aren't allowed, this will be an added
> difficulty for the Internet growth in the region, and increase the
> difficulties for the continued IPv6 deployment.
>
> The region needs this policy *now*, because the implementation requires
> several months as there is a need to coordinate with the systems of the
> other RIRs, in order to ensure a transparent transfers process.
>
> So, what is your opinion?
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
> @jordipalet
>
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:41:32 +0000 (UTC)
> From: aleruchi chuku <aleruchichuku at yahoo.com>
> To: "pascal at irenala.edu.mg" <pascal at irenala.edu.mg>, ishola kabir
> <isholakabir at gmail.com>
> Cc: "rpd at afrinic.net" <rpd at afrinic.net>
> Subject: Re: [rpd] IPV4 inter-RIR Legacy Resources Transfer.
> Message-ID: <820859170.2990967.1560847292489 at mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> If the IPV4 is not enough for the region, then there will be nothing to
> transfere....would there?
> But where it is available and as we all know gradually becoming "old" in
> our region, then perhaps it is truly to our benefit to be able to transfere
> this resource to other regions as well as recieve from them.
> Aleruchi
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 9:07 am, Pascal ANDRIANISA<pascal at irenala.edu.mg>
> wrote: _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190618/62b669f5/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:44:56 +0400
> From: Kris Seeburn <seeburn.k at gmail.com>
> To: "aleruchichuku at yahoo.com" <aleruchichuku at yahoo.com>
> Cc: "rpd at afrinic.net" <rpd at afrinic.net>, ishola kabir
> <isholakabir at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [rpd] IPV4 inter-RIR Legacy Resources Transfer.
> Message-ID: <CFC03DF5-3CAE-492E-83F5-88BA46719F7D at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> That is a thought of sense. If we do that we equate and live another day
> as we say. Yes old it will be and pushing to be at par with others is the
> way through
>
> > On 18 Jun 2019, at 12:41, aleruchi chuku via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > If the IPV4 is not enough for the region, then there will be nothing to
> transfere....would there?
> >
> > But where it is available and as we all know gradually becoming "old" in
> our region, then perhaps it is truly to our benefit to be able to transfere
> this resource to other regions as well as recieve from them.
> >
> > Aleruchi
> >
> > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android <
> https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
> > On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 9:07 am, Pascal ANDRIANISA
> > <pascal at irenala.edu.mg> wrote:
> > _______________________________________________
> > RPD mailing list
> > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd <
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>
> > _______________________________________________
> > RPD mailing list
> > RPD at afrinic.net
> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190618/149ac107/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:43:58 +0100
> From: Hussein Olanrewaju AKANDE <elsufi at unilorin.edu.ng>
> To: Kris Seeburn <seeburn.k at gmail.com>
> Cc: "AfriNIC RPD MList." <rpd at afrinic.net>
> Subject: Re: [rpd] IPV4 inter-RIR Legacy Resources Transfer
> Message-ID:
> <CAEsR0rUKoKOH=ku-qHHo7ShWymOHzX_dE4r80DF=
> nqcP2ciFJQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I agree with you perfectly.
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 9:05 AM Kris Seeburn <seeburn.k at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I?ll second and if not support that resources be used than kept in the
> > coffer. If the coffer generated some interest I would see no issue but
> our
> > existence is also trying to find a stability between all the RIRs and
> > resources needs to be used for continuous existence and sustainability.
> >
> > On 18 Jun 2019, at 11:53, Hussein Olanrewaju AKANDE <
> > elsufi at unilorin.edu.ng> wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> > Thank you Mark Elkins for those wonderful points, I do not understand why
> > we should continue to keep the resources when they can easily be
> utilized.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 8:21 AM <rpd-request at afrinic.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Send RPD mailing list submissions to
> >> rpd at afrinic.net
> >>
> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >> rpd-request at afrinic.net
> >>
> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >> rpd-owner at afrinic.net
> >>
> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >> than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."
> >>
> >>
> >> Today's Topics:
> >>
> >> 1. Re: Nomcom feedback to PDWG (Owen DeLong)
> >> 2. Re: IPV4 inter-RIR Legacy Resources Transfer. (Pascal ANDRIANISA)
> >> 3. Re: IPV4 inter-RIR Legacy Resources Transfer. (Mark Elkins)
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 23:19:55 +0300
> >> From: Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com>
> >> To: Ernest Byaruhanga <ernest at afrinic.net>
> >> Cc: 2019 NomCom <nomcom2019 at afrinic.net>, rpd at afrinic.net
> >> Subject: Re: [rpd] Nomcom feedback to PDWG
> >> Message-ID: <F7C58339-1AD0-4729-95E3-3F1110B5C11B at delong.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> >>
> >> Ernest, as I understand the PDP and the bylaws, the only appropriate way
> >> to implement the output of that committee would be for the committee to
> >> write up one or more policy proposals to codify then into the PDP and
> have
> >> the community come to consensus on them.
> >>
> >> Failing that, they are an ex party change to the PDP in violation of the
> >> PDP and the bylaws. While I agree with most of the recommendations on
> that
> >> page, we must above all preserve the integrity of the process and
> therefore
> >> follow the rules when we seek to amend the process.
> >>
> >> Owen
> >>
> >>
> >> > On Jun 17, 2019, at 17:08, Ernest Byaruhanga <ernest at afrinic.net>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Owen,
> >> >
> >> > An update to the PDWG co-chair election process was produced by an
> >> elections process review committee instituted by the CEO and shared with
> >> the community for comments and feedback, sometime in 2012:
> >> >
> >> > https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2012/002145.html
> >> >
> >> > Unfortunately we are not able to download or locate the original copy,
> >> but the adopted document used in 2013 included the requirement that
> those
> >> voting should be residing within the AFRINIC region.
> >> >
> >> > The elections committee has however never enforced this requirement
> >> despite its presence in the elections guideline, which was presumably an
> >> output of that review committee based on comments and feedback
> consequent
> >> to the call for comments.
> >> >
> >> > The elections committee will therefore not be enforcing this
> >> requirement in the coming election based on precedent.
> >> >
> >> > On the issue of remote participants voting, we have not provided for
> >> this before, and unfortunately not at the upcoming election.
> >> >
> >> > We welcome and will include the community?s feedback towards improving
> >> the current election processes.
> >> >
> >> > Ernest.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> On 16 Jun 2019, at 09:08, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I have some questions about the conduct of this election.
> >> >>
> >> >> First, I would think that the controlling document would be the CPM
> >> and not some random webpage of unknown origin.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thus, I suggest that the rules (such as they are) are outlined in CPM
> >> section 3 and that where the following page:
> >> >> https://afrinic.net/policy/development-working-group#election
> >> >>
> >> >> Conflicts or provides additional restrictions, the CPM should be
> >> controlling and additional restrictions specified there are not valid.
> >> >>
> >> >> I have not yet seen anyone answer Dewole?s earlier question about
> >> where this procedure came from and how it was deployed without community
> >> involvement or consensus.
> >> >>
> >> >> Amending the election procedure (or even making it more specific)
> >> should be done through modification of the PDP via the PDP.
> >> >>
> >> >> It certainly should not be done ad hoc by AfriNIC staff, the board,
> or
> >> whoever else produced that page.
> >> >>
> >> >> For example, it has never previously been the practice that one must
> >> reside in a country within AfriNIC region in order to vote for PDWG
> >> co-chair, nor should it be. AfriNIC policies affect those outside of the
> >> region as well as those within the region and there are a significant
> >> number of people active in the PDWG that do not live within the region,
> >> myself included.
> >> >>
> >> >> No RIR that I know of restricts voting for PDWG co-chairs (or
> >> equivalent) to those residing in the region.
> >> >>
> >> >> Then there is the question of remote participants voting.
> >> >>
> >> >> The CPM section 3.3 is silent on this matter for a normal election,
> so
> >> that leaves an open question.
> >> >> However,
> https://afrinic.net/policy/development-working-group#election
> >> states that you must be physically present in the room and must have a
> >> badge showing that you have registered (assuming that they sort out the
> >> irregularities with badge printing).
> >> >>
> >> >> Can we please get some clarification on the procedure for this
> >> election at least 24 hours before the voting starts?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >>
> >> >> Owen
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>> On Jun 9, 2019, at 1:51 AM, Dewole Ajao <dewole at forum.org.ng>
> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I was going to reply to say there are no standing rules on conduct
> of
> >> PDWG elections but I see from the CPM that the PDP election process
> somehow
> >> seems to have evolved. Can someone in the know please clarify how we
> came
> >> about the detailed election notes outlined at
> >> https://afrinic.net/policy/development-working-group#election ? This is
> >> bearing in mind that changes to the PDP can only be done via the PDP.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> My suggestion about giving the working group the option of retaining
> >> the current co-chair was an attempt to avoid 2 co-chairs leaving after
> the
> >> same meeting. Note that my suggested process allows the working group
> >> members present (who are the deciders of who becomes co-chair) the
> option
> >> of rejecting the default seat retention.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> In any case, all of this is speculation as a result of the NomCom
> >> asking us what we think. At this point, it is over to Elections
> Committee
> >> to tell us how they intend to handle this.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Regards,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Dewole.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> On 6/8/2019 11:31 PM, Daniel Yakmut wrote:
> >> >>>> I want to believe that we have standing rules on who is qualify to
> >> be voted and how our elections should be conducted. I hope we not
> trying to
> >> define new rules here.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> We should stick to the rules and all candidates regardless should
> be
> >> given a level playing field. i don't subscribe to allowing anyone giving
> >> any special consideration.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> In particular I believe that all the candidates that are
> >> volunteering, could possibly some fresh air to the conduct of the PWDG.
> So
> >> let us not disadvantage anyone.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> So far NomCom have shown commitment to a fair process and
> >> maintaining that going forward will be important.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Simply,
> >> >>>> Danile
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> On Jun 8, 2019, at 11:06 PM, Dewole Ajao <dewole at forum.org.ng>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Sorry, the election slot is missing from the draft agenda I shared
> >> earlier. It may be inefficient to have election at the start of the
> policy
> >> day so it is planned to hold towards the end of the day. Holding the
> >> election before the open mic will allow working group members also
> provide
> >> feedback on the process during the open mic.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> The contents of
> >> https://www.afrinic.net/candidate-slate-for-pdwg-election-2019 remain
> >> unchanged from the pre-protest announcement. Perhaps we should wait for
> >> NomCom to tell the working group who the co-chair candidates are
> (before we
> >> start the questioning)? For future PDWG elections, the questions could
> be
> >> included as part of the information to provide during the nominations
> >> stage. Or maybe some have already been asked by NomCom and the
> candidates
> >> only need to decide what they wish to share with us.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> One would imagine that the Elections Committee already has a plan
> >> for incorporating remote participants who will naturally expect to
> >> participate in the co-chair selection as allowed by the PDP.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Regards,
> >> >>>>> Dewole.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On 6/8/2019 10:07 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> >> >>>>>> Hi Dewole, all,
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I will agree with your suggestion, it is very important to keep
> >> continuity of the existing co-chairs.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Also, I think to avoid wasting precious time, it may be good to
> >> consider running the election at the end of the open mic, so even if the
> >> election process is delayed for whatever, reason, the PDP discussion
> time
> >> is respected.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> One of the elected co-chairs will be running for just one year,
> or
> >> how it will be handled in order to get the staggered terms?
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Finally, I've a question for the NomCom and the PDP-chair
> >> candidates. And I think this is very important for a successful
> knowledge
> >> by the community to whom they are electing. This is not about electing
> >> "your best friend for driving a party", but the people that better knows
> >> the PDP and has already been following it.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> So, I will like to know, for each of the candidates, since when
> >> they have been in the RPD mailing list, how they have contributed in the
> >> discussions in the list and meetings, or even with policy proposals. How
> >> the candidates are going to support the PDP, increase community
> >> participation, etc. Also, we need to understand if they have actively
> >> supported or non-supported any of the actual policy proposals, so we can
> >> avoid electing two chairs that may have a bias on the same policy
> proposal.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Reading the actual CVs at
> >> https://www.afrinic.net/candidate-slate-for-pdwg-election-2019, I don't
> >> think all the candidates have that information right now.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> So, can the NomCom prepare a document answering (with verified
> >> responses to some extent) those questions for each of the candidate and
> >> publish it together with the CVs ?
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Regards,
> >> >>>>>> Jordi
> >> >>>>>> ?El 8/6/19 21:10, "Dewole Ajao" <dewole at forum.org.ng> escribi?:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> A simple solution to clear any confusion would be for the
> >> Nomination
> >> >>>>>> Committee to send out a fresh announcement listing the final
> >> slate of
> >> >>>>>> candidates after their considerations have been done.
> >> >>>>>> Elections Committee should at this point also state how
> >> the seats would
> >> >>>>>> be filled so that everyone is clear about that. There have
> been
> >> >>>>>> suggestions on how to fill the positions; better to sort them
> >> out now
> >> >>>>>> rather than waste scarce time on the policy day.
> >> >>>>>> My suggestion (and I may be biased) is this:
> >> >>>>>> Since a current co-chair (Sami) is running, show of hands to
> >> see if the
> >> >>>>>> working group is in support of Sami retaining his seat. If
> >> majority in
> >> >>>>>> support of Sami continuing, then remainder of the election is
> >> for one
> >> >>>>>> seat going to whichever of the remaining candidates has the
> >> maximum votes.
> >> >>>>>> If the outcome of the first vote is not in favour of
> >> current co-chair
> >> >>>>>> taking a seat by default, then second round of voting can be
> >> for 2 seats
> >> >>>>>> possibly using the option of higher votes getting the longer
> >> term.
> >> >>>>>> Again, this is just my point of view.
> >> >>>>>> Regards,
> >> >>>>>> Dewole.
> >> >>>>>>> On 6/8/2019 5:25 PM, Ish Sookun wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> Hi Serge,
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> On 6/8/19 2:21 PM, Iyedi Goma wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>> The Nomination Committee reviewed the nomination of the persons
> >> who
> >> >>>>>>>> submitted their documentation. The Nomination Committee Chair
> >> contacted
> >> >>>>>>>> each nominee to notify him/her of the decision.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Is this particular update referring to all the nominees,
> nominees
> >> that
> >> >>>>>>> complained or only nominees that remained after the NomCom
> filter.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> The text "persons who submitted their documentation" requires
> more
> >> >>>>>>> clarity IMHO.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Ish Sookun
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>>>>> RPD mailing list
> >> >>>>>>> RPD at afrinic.net
> >> >>>>>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> >> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>>>> RPD mailing list
> >> >>>>>> RPD at afrinic.net
> >> >>>>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> **********************************************
> >> >>>>>> IPv4 is over
> >> >>>>>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> >> >>>>>> http://www.theipv6company.com
> >> >>>>>> The IPv6 Company
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> This electronic message contains information which may be
> >> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the
> >> exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further
> non-explicilty
> >> authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of
> this
> >> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> >> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> >> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution
> or
> >> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> >> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> >> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> >> communication and delete it.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>>> RPD mailing list
> >> >>>>> RPD at afrinic.net
> >> >>>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> >> >>>
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> RPD mailing list
> >> >>> RPD at afrinic.net
> >> >>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> RPD mailing list
> >> >> RPD at afrinic.net
> >> >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 2
> >> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:05:12 +0300 (EAT)
> >> From: Pascal ANDRIANISA <pascal at irenala.edu.mg>
> >> To: ishola kabir <isholakabir at gmail.com>
> >> Cc: rpd at afrinic.net
> >> Subject: Re: [rpd] IPV4 inter-RIR Legacy Resources Transfer.
> >> Message-ID:
> >> <1103848571.189374.1560837912327.JavaMail.zimbra at irenala.edu.mg
> >
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >>
> >> Dear Ishola Kabir,
> >> I think the transfer of inter-RIR does not benefit AFRINIC for the
> simple
> >> reason that AFRINIC's resources are not enough for its region.
> >>
> >> Regard,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Pascal Heriliva ANDRIANISA
> >> Webmaster i RENALA
> >> R esearch and E ducation N etwork for A cademic and L earning A
> ctivities
> >> - [ http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ | http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ ]
> >> Porte 201 - Minist?re de l'Enseignement Sup?rieur et de la Recherche
> >> Scientifique - Fiadanana
> >> GSM :+261 (0) 32 46 680 29 | +261 (0) 34 30 680 29
> >>
> >>
> >> De: "ishola kabir" <isholakabir at gmail.com>
> >> ?: rpd at afrinic.net
> >> Envoy?: Lundi 17 Juin 2019 17:17:58
> >> Objet: Re: [rpd] IPV4 inter-RIR Legacy Resources Transfer.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I stand to support the policy on proposal of IPV4 inter-RIR legacy
> >> resources transfer.
> >>
> >>
> >> We're running out of IPV4 resources and the Regional Internet Registries
> >> (RIRs) have started to run out of of IPV4 resources as well. IPv4
> inter-RIR
> >> legacy resources from and to other regions will offer a realistic
> solution
> >> to the problem of reclaiming the significant amount of unused IPV4
> >> resources and allocating them to their most efficient users. The
> transfer
> >> will be subject to the need to main route aggregation and allow
> resources
> >> not in used in one region to be transferred to a region where it is
> needed.
> >>
> >>
> >> Preventing IPv4 Inter-RIR Legacy Resource Transfers would only push the
> >> demand and supply pressures surrounding the scarcity of resources into
> >> different channel such as the holder of this unused resources will do
> >> everything within their power for continued possession of this resources
> >> for purpose of black market, increase their value in an acquisition.
> >>
> >>
> >> Inter-RIR Legacy would definitely allows organization willing to release
> >> address resources to benefit monetarily by selling them to another
> region
> >> who wants them subject to the record keeping requirements and
> regulation of
> >> inter regional legacy instead of being hijacked or use without
> >> authorization.
> >>
> >>
> >> It is very obvious that the risk associated with this will be very small
> >> when compare to the potential benefit and this will also reinforce
> >> effectiveness of the inter Regional Internet Address Registries in
> global
> >> internet governance.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> RPD mailing list
> >> RPD at afrinic.net
> >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> >>
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL: <
> >>
> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190618/c6c04f42/attachment-0001.html
> >> >
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 3
> >> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:19:24 +0200
> >> From: Mark Elkins <mje at posix.co.za>
> >> To: rpd at afrinic.net
> >> Subject: Re: [rpd] IPV4 inter-RIR Legacy Resources Transfer.
> >> Message-ID: <e927753c-91b9-364f-ba24-22613d8fc362 at posix.co.za>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
> >>
> >> IPv4 resources were never enough for the world (Four-ish billion IP
> >> addresses). That's why IPv6 was created. The other four RIR's have
> >> basically run out of IPv4 - which to an extent has forced them to adopt
> >> IPv6. In a perverse way - its actually bad for Africa to NOT have run
> >> out as we lazily continue to deploy IPv4 - last years technology as
> >> such.. Better to move straight to IPv6 before we are too weighed down by
> >> the legacy restrictiveness of IPv4 addresses.
> >>
> >> Also - the Transfer Policy would generally need to be bidirectional so
> >> that other RIR regions will allow the transfer of IPv4 resources into
> >> Africa - that is, play on an equal footing - if indeed some of the
> >> larger African ISP's need to acquire more IPv4 addresses.
> >>
> >> If an African LIR/ISP does sell IPv4 resources to another region then
> >> the capitol will probably be used to expand that LIR's business -
> >> presumably in an IPv6 direction - which would be beneficial to that
> >> LIR's customers and to an extent, the rest of our community.
> >>
> >> Just think, for the first time ever, we get to dump old technology onto
> >> "developed" countries rather than the other way around.
> >>
> >> On 2019/06/18 08:05, Pascal ANDRIANISA wrote:
> >> > Dear Ishola Kabir, I think the transfer of inter-RIR does not benefit
> >> > AFRINIC for the simple reason that AFRINIC's resources are not enough
> >> > for its region. Regard,
> >> >
> >> > *Pascal* Heriliva ANDRIANISA
> >> > Webmaster i RENALA
> >> > *R*esearch and *E*ducation *N*etwork for *A*cademic and *L*earning
> >> > *A*ctivities - http://www.irenala.edu.mg/
> >> > Porte 201 - Minist?re de l'Enseignement Sup?rieur et de la Recherche
> >> > Scientifique - Fiadanana_
> >> > GSM :+261 (0) 32 46 680 29?? |??? +261 (0) 34 30 680 29_
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > *De: *"ishola kabir" <isholakabir at gmail.com>
> >> > *?: *rpd at afrinic.net
> >> > *Envoy?: *Lundi 17 Juin 2019 17:17:58
> >> > *Objet: *Re: [rpd] IPV4 inter-RIR Legacy Resources Transfer.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I stand to support the policy on proposal of IPV4 inter-RIR legacy
> >> > resources transfer.
> >> >
> >> > We're running out of IPV4 resources and the Regional Internet
> >> > Registries (RIRs) have started to run out of of IPV4 resources as
> >> > well. IPv4 inter-RIR legacy resources from and to other regions will
> >> > offer a realistic solution to the problem of reclaiming the
> >> > significant amount of unused IPV4 resources and allocating them to
> >> > their most efficient users. The transfer will be subject to the need
> >> > to main route aggregation and allow resources not in used in one
> >> > region to be transferred to a region where it is needed.
> >> >
> >> > Preventing IPv4 Inter-RIR Legacy Resource Transfers would only push
> >> > the demand ?and supply pressures surrounding the scarcity of resources
> >> > into different channel such as the holder of this unused resources
> >> > will do everything within their power for continued possession of this
> >> > resources for purpose of black market, increase their value in an
> >> > acquisition.
> >> >
> >> > Inter-RIR Legacy would definitely allows organization willing to
> >> > release address resources to benefit monetarily by selling them to
> >> > another region who wants them subject to the record keeping
> >> > requirements and regulation of inter regional legacy instead of being
> >> > hijacked or use without authorization.
> >> >
> >> > It is very obvious that the risk associated with this will be very
> >> > small when compare to the potential benefit and this will also
> >> > reinforce effectiveness of the inter Regional Internet Address
> >> > Registries in global internet governance.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > RPD mailing list
> >> > RPD at afrinic.net
> >> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > RPD mailing list
> >> > RPD at afrinic.net
> >> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> >>
> >> --
> >> Mark James ELKINS - Posix Systems - (South) Africa
> >> mje at posix.co.za Tel: +27.128070590 Cell: +27.826010496
> >> For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za
> >>
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL: <
> >>
> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190618/2a666596/attachment.html
> >> >
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Subject: Digest Footer
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> RPD mailing list
> >> RPD at afrinic.net
> >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> End of RPD Digest, Vol 153, Issue 66
> >> ************************************
> >>
> >
> > Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/>, Weekly Bulletin
> > <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal
> > <http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal
> > <https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > RPD mailing list
> > RPD at afrinic.net
> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng>,?Weekly Bulletin
> <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin>?UGPortal
> <http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal
> <https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190618/d872d142/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of RPD Digest, Vol 153, Issue 70
> ************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190618/73b70563/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the RPD
mailing list