Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Fwd: [arin-ppml] Micfo
geier at geier.ne.tz
Thu May 16 16:19:40 UTC 2019
On 16/05/2019 19:02, Noah wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2019, 18:19 Frank Habicht, <geier at geier.ne.tz
> <mailto:geier at geier.ne.tz>> wrote:
> I just say that with the current RSA effective action by AfriNIC is
> possible. 
> And that's all that matters.
> Others are saying otherwise and I am not sure if there is any evidence
> to show that the AfriNIC RSA is effective in terms of ensuring
> compliance in cases of abuse or fraud....
I don't need evidence that "the AfriNIC RSA is effective". I just
You need to show evidence that AfriNIC RSA is NOT effective, if you (or
someone else) want(s) to justify a policy change. We're waiting for it.
In the ARIN region they call this the "burden of proof".
I'm ok with the status quo.
> In the past some members have closed their entities and their INR
> recovered while others have voluntarily returned INR as per records from
> PS: ARIN is different from AfriNIC. there's a reason there are 5
> different RIRs.
> Well dont we all know that we have 5 different RIR's...........
> While you may believe they are different, their similarities outweigh
> their differences imho
and the differences are enough to justify "duplication" of having 5
organisations doing "the same thing". 
> and the Internet Protocol is the same across the
Ehm.... we knew this. But thanks.
 according to Owen they made policy additions to limit the powers of
the RIR to go after members.
PS: am I understanding it right that this discussion is still about
AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT-06 "Internet Number Resources Review by AFRINIC"?
More information about the RPD