Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Cooperation re PDP update proposal

Komi Elitcha kmw.elitcha at gmail.com
Mon Feb 18 12:33:09 UTC 2019


Dear co-chairs,

  As you know, PDP update discussions  at Afrinic-29  were rich and  led 
to the abandonment of the competing  proposal.

PDP-BIS authors will not support  a complete rewrite  of the proposal 
under discussion, especially from author of the withdrawn proposal, who  
changed  his  mind after supporting the proposal at Afrinic 28

The current version of PDP-BIS proposal is the fruit of community inputs 
and raise of multiple concerns. We welcome new areas of *essential* 
improvement if we have not dealt with yet.

Please, lead this process to conclusion.

Thank you.

On behalf of PDP-BIS Authors

On 10/02/2019 20:47, Dewole Ajao wrote:
> Good day Authors,
>
> I trust you are doing well. As agreed during the last public policy 
> meeting, I hope you have given some thought to how contributions on 
> the PDP update proposal can be accepted.
>
> Jordi, you had mentioned some areas that you believe need improvement 
> in the current PDP BIS proposal draft - can we start by laying out 
> these areas and seeing which ones can be absorbed into the PDP BIS draft?
>
> Authors, would it be possible to group the proposed changes to the PDP 
> in such a way that patches are applied to the areas of concern that 
> reach rough consensus of the PDWG rather than waiting to have 
> agreement on *all* the parts of the proposal? These groups of changes 
> could also be proposed simultaneously as separate proposals at the 
> same time if all parts must be addressed at once.
>
> Do note that you are not compelled to do any of the above but this is 
> the co-chairs' attempt to see the process move forward in a manner 
> that would save us months and see us finding rough consensus on all or 
> part of the existing proposal; As per the PDP, the alternatives of 
> maintaining the status quo and/or accepting new proposals on the same 
> subject definitely remain.
>
> Please note that the rpd list is in copy so that other members may 
> also volunteer input as this process goes on. Looking forward to 
> reading from you soon.
>
> Regards,
>
> PDWG Co-Chairs.
>
-- 
KE
https://www.linkedin.com/in/komi-elitcha/




More information about the RPD mailing list