[rpd] Opposing the last call made on the review policy

[1mgirlieadezpet at gmail.com]

I have been following up closely as events have been unfolding. I can easily deduce that the authors of this policy have clearly shown little to no regard for the opinion of the community.
I mean, why would they still present and try to impose the exact same papers/documents that majority of the participants were vehemently opposed to at the last meeting in Dakar? We all are well aware that the RSA has addressed this policy.
Why would they call for contributions from the community when it is now obvious that their clear intent was to disregard anyway? Why push a policy rejected by the community to the last call stage when no positive consensus has been agreed upon? The community should have been informed to stay completely out of the development process since a few number of us have decided to monopolize and impose certain policies with or without the acceptance of the majority.
I still want to give the chairs and co-chairs a benefit of the doubt. I want to believe this is an error so I will like for them to revert and do the needful ASAP as this will eventually result in lack of trust in their capacity.
To the authors, there are better ways to address a situation such as this. Antagonism/ aggression and/or intimidation is clearly not the right way.
Warmest regards.GracefulSent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Mark Elkins<mje at posix.co.za> wrote:   _______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20181202/0efd44b6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Untitled
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20181202/0efd44b6/attachment.ksh>