[rpd] policy proposal - Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ]

Hi Sander,

Now I understand it. You are also trying to solve one more issue, which is fair and very convenient.

I think this deserves a new version of the policy proposal, updating also the abstract and so on, as we are now killing to birds with one stone.

Your point is to make sure that it is not considered a sub-assignment when for example a services company deploys their own equipment as part of a contracted service, in the end-user, and of course, in that network they will use the end-user addressing space.

Working on that !

Regards,
Jordi
 
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl>
Fecha: miércoles, 15 de agosto de 2018, 18:07
Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
CC: <rpd at afrinic.net>
Asunto: Re: [rpd] policy proposal - Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments

    Hi Jordi,
    
    Please find a mail client that does proper quoting, this was very hard to read :)
    
    > ->>> My problem is that I read it as a duplicated:
    > "Providing one or more separate addresses to third party devices for use on a network managed and operated by the assignment holder"
    > and
    > "temporarily provided address space to third parties "
    > 
    > ->>> may be now you see why I try to make those 2 sentences a single one?
    
    Yes, and you won't be able to because they are very separate cases. Please go back and read again because it's not duplicate.
    
    One is allowing separate permanent addresses to devices to connect to a network managed by the holder. More point-to-multipoint
    
    The other is allowing addresses or prefixes (for example for VMs as you said) but only on a temporary basis.
    
    Trying to combine those into one sentence won't work.
    
    Cheers,
    Sander
    
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.