[rpd] Appeal against softlanding-bis declaration of consensus

[Ornella GANKPA]

Hi Mark

Again this is not true. It is explicitely said in the policy that any
organization (regardless of its size) can be allocated /18 within a 24
month period during exhaustion phase 1 and /22 during exhaustion phase
2. Anyone can always get more allocation as long as they justify 90%
utilization. I fail to see how it prevents growth for anyone. However it
does ensure good management of our ressources.

The policy doesn't punish success. In any case, it encourages carefully
planned growth

Why would anyone disagree with that? Is IPv6 not the common sense option
for any growth plan?

Regards

Honest Ornella GANKPA

Le 04/01/2018 à 11:36, Mark Elkins a écrit :
> Thus, by extension, the revised policy is generally harmful to larger
> LIR's. They need larger blocks in order to grow, which this revision
> of the policy does not allow. This policy is therefore discriminatory
> against larger (which probably implies more successful) LIR's. Thus,
> the policy harms success (and larger LIR's who need more space).

---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus