Search RPD Archives
[rpd] FW: Opposition to the changes in the AfriNIC Soft Landing Policy
ismail at tispa.or.tz
Wed Dec 6 20:07:21 UTC 2017
Sorry my apologies for taking this long to get round to answering this.
Well I had thought there wasn't one in place but good to know there is a
policy in place.
Please excuse any typos or omissions as this email has been sent on the
On 4 Dec 2017 6:31 pm, "Mike Silber" <silber.mike at gmail.com> wrote:
On 4 Dec 2017, at 17:16, Ismail Settenda <ismail at tispa.or.tz> wrote:
Well lets not confuse silence with agreement and seeing the unpleasant
sentiments...one cant really blame some for keeping quiet.
I for one will *support* the policy because there is no such policy to deal
with such a scenario in the first place
I have no problem with your views, but I think you may be confused.
There IS a policy in place: https://www.afrinic.
This is a suggestion to amend the existing soft landing policy and making
it more restrictive.
I have a few issues with the existing policy, but I think it is a
reasonable compromise in the circumstances.
My objection is to adding further restrictions, as is proposed in the -bis
and the longer we stay without one the more vulnerable we become.
Actually we have one in place, so I am not sure I understand your point.
So I like to think I see the logic in the arguments for the proposal
however there is s greater danger in having NO measure or policy in place
rather than have a perfect one in place when it is too late.
Well this is actually what is being discussed here: we have a measure and
policy in place right now. This is a proposal to refine it further. I have
yet to see a justification I can accept for the need for such further
Unless I have missed your comment completely, in which case I apologise.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD