Search RPD Archives
[rpd] IPv4 Soft Landing BIS
owen at delong.com
Fri Jul 28 19:52:44 UTC 2017
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 11:50 , Boubakar Barry <boubakarbarry at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com <mailto:owen at delong.com>> wrote:
> Current policy is need basis. This proposal goes beyond need basis to apply additional restrictions that are unfair.
> "Unfair" for sure for those who are abusing or intend to abuse the current policy. And this has been made very clear by the authors an uncountable couple of times.
Please define what you mean by “abuse”.
If you mean getting the addresses you need in order to meet a present operational need under the existing policy, then I fail to see how this can be classified as “abuse”.
This proposal would be unfair to real networks who have an operational need for addresses today.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD