[rpd] Lame Delegations in AFRINIC Reverse DNS Proposal

[Bill Woodcock]

> On May 31, 2017, at 10:57 AM, David Siebörger <drs at sieborger.nom.za> wrote:
> I support the Lame Delegations proposal.
> The only concern I have is that, while the policy calls for repeated testing
> before taking action (proposed CPM 10.7.1), the tests should be conducted
> from multiple locations on the Internet.  A routing problem which causes a
> nameserver to be only partially reachable should not result in delegations to
> that nameserver being removed.  This may be merely an implementation detail
> that doesn't need to be explicitly addressed in policy, though.

Agreed.  I do believe that’s an implementation detail rather than policy, also.

An implementation could use the RIPE Atlas API, which could easily satisfy your (very reasonable) requirement.

                                -Bill




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20170531/c535ac21/attachment.sig>