[rpd] Lame Delegations in AFRINIC Reverse DNS Proposal

[Frank Habicht]

Hi,

On 5/31/2017 11:21 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>> On May 31, 2017, at 10:57 AM, David Siebörger
>> <drs at sieborger.nom.za> wrote: I support the Lame Delegations
>> proposal. The only concern I have is that, while the policy calls
>> for repeated testing before taking action (proposed CPM 10.7.1),
>> the tests should be conducted from multiple locations on the
>> Internet.  A routing problem which causes a nameserver to be only
>> partially reachable should not result in delegations to that
>> nameserver being removed.  This may be merely an implementation
>> detail that doesn't need to be explicitly addressed in policy,
>> though.
> 
> Agreed.  I do believe that’s an implementation detail rather than
> policy, also.
> 
> An implementation could use the RIPE Atlas API, which could easily
> satisfy your (very reasonable) requirement.
> 
> -Bill

I also agree to all of the above.

Frank