Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Staff & Legal Assessements on "Internet Numbers review by AFRINIC"'s Proposal
d.hilario at laruscloudservice.net
Mon May 15 05:00:50 UTC 2017
Thanks for the quick explanation.
Can you please also answer the following.
Since "First in first out" is not a way to measure workload, but a work
How was it concluded no significant increase in workload?
How many random audits will AFRINIC LTD be planning per year?
On May 13, 2017 7:36 PM, "Alan Barrett" <alan.barrett at afrinic.net> wrote:
> > On 12 May 2017, at 18:32, Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Co-Chairs, Dear community,
> > After reading and analyzing the staff analysis, we realized that it was
> totally different from the first staff analysis. Then a question came to
> mind, why a new staff analysis for the same policy, even though all updates
> are made to address the old staff analysis and discussions on the PDPWG.
> The new staff analysis is for the new version of the proposal. Some of
> the changes in the analysis are due to changes in the proposal, and some
> are due to changes in staff understanding or opinion.
> Alan Barrett
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD