[rpd] Staff & Legal Assessements on "Internet Numbers review by AFRINIC"'s Proposal

[David Hilario]

Hi Alan,

Thanks for the quick explanation.

Can you please also answer the following.

Since "First in first out" is not a way to measure workload, but a work
method.
How was it concluded no significant increase in workload?

How many random audits will AFRINIC LTD be planning per year?

Cheers,
David

On May 13, 2017 7:36 PM, "Alan Barrett" <alan.barrett at afrinic.net> wrote:

>
> > On 12 May 2017, at 18:32, Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Co-Chairs, Dear community,
> >
> > After reading and analyzing the staff analysis, we realized that it was
> totally different from the first staff analysis. Then a question came to
> mind, why a new staff analysis for the same policy, even though all updates
> are made to address the old staff analysis and discussions on the PDPWG.
>
> The new staff analysis is for the new version of the proposal.  Some of
> the changes in the analysis are due to changes in the proposal, and some
> are due to changes in staff understanding or opinion.
>
> Alan Barrett
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20170515/c30dea9a/attachment.html>