Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Internet Number Resources review

sm+afrinic at elandsys.com sm+afrinic at elandsys.com
Sun Dec 11 14:40:41 UTC 2016


Hi Serge,
At 04:08 11-12-2016, serge ilunga wrote:
>Pour notre part, en lisant le Feedback legal [1] nous comprenons que 
>le RSA est un document liant les parties signataires et qu'au regard 
>du droit mauricien, il est legal que AfriNIC puisse faire le 
>review/audit des membres et  proceder a la recuperation des 
>ressources en cas de non-respect des termes dy RSA.

Le commentaire du conseiller juridique d'Afrinic Ltd etait:

   "It is perfectly lawful , in terms of the application of the 
Mauritius Civil Code ,
    for AFRINIC to act under the said section and reclaim resources from those
    members who/which fail an audit/review exercise"

Et:

  "publishing detailed member information in publicly available audit reports
   can bring AFRINIC under a legal spotlight with possible litigation, and
   advised that a policy should not bind AFRINIC to publish information that
   can lead to such situations a policy should not bind AFRINIC to publish
   information that can lead to such situations."

>Une telle proposition de politique ne contribue qu'a faire ce qui 
>est prescrit dans le RSA  de maniere claire et transparente sur base 
>d'un document approuve par la communaute.

Le "staff" d'Afrinic Ltd a ecrit ce qui suit:

   'The requirement that the review be conducted with "full transparency" may
    be in conflict with privacy provisions in NDAs, in the RSA, or in law.'

   'The requirement to publish a "compliance report" may be in conflict with
    privacy provisions in NDAs, in the RSA, or in law.'

La Section 3.6 n'est pas prescrit dans le RSA.

>Les discussions faites lors de la derniere reunion en plus des 
>reponses des autres RIRs sur l'existence de politiques similaires 
>dans leurs regions respectives, nous indiquent que nous sommes dans 
>la bonne direction.

Selon ARIN:

  "The reporter (whistle blower) is not disclosed publicly however, neither is
   the detailed report of the investigation published."

Et selon RIPE NCC:

   "Results of investigations are not published."

Les autres RIRs ne publient pas de rapport d'enquete.

>Comme tu peux le constater, il n'y a pas de risque tel que tu l'as evoque.

Le cadre juridique qui regit Afrinic Ltd n'est pas similaire au cadre 
juridique qui regit un autre RIR.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy 




More information about the RPD mailing list