[rpd] Inbound Policy

[sm+afrinic at elandsys.com]

Hi David,
At 05:19 05-12-2016, fransossen at yahoo.com wrote:
>Great for the sellers selling large block to large entities in need 
>of hundreds of thousands of IPs, large entities tend not to care 
>about money too much (purposefully exaggerated statement unless you 
>are google, amazon or similar then it remains true).
>Horrible for smaller organisations that only need a small range like 
>a /22 or even smaller for some business critical infrastructure expansion.
>
>Transfers generally already only benefit larger organisations, since 
>transfers also have a large financial cost attached to them, 
>organisations willing to seek a transfer do this out of desperation 
>or too much money and easy way out.
>But smaller organisation are now priced out even before the transfer 
>market begins, through the fact that only one of the transfer 
>policies was passed through, neither would had been better than just 
>one, both would had been best.

I took a look at the IPv4 statistics for the region and I found that 
IPv4 address space is still available.  Why are organisations in the 
region requiring a /22 or less priced out?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy