Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Inbound Policy

Honest Ornella GANKPA honest1989 at
Tue Nov 29 08:45:12 UTC 2016

I do not support this policy.

As others have stated before, it would be unfair to have an inbound policy
with no outbound pssible for other RIRs . Afrinic still has ipv4 ressources
so this policy is really not necessary at the moment. Also agreeing with
this policy would  be contradictory to the general tone of our discussions
lately, that is wasting time focusing on IPv4 when we should be discussing
how accelerating the uptake of IPv6.

Honest Ornella GANKPA

2016-11-29 9:39 GMT+01:00 Omo Oaiya <Omo.Oaiya at>:

> > On 29 Nov 2016, at 12:28, Mark Elkins <mje at> wrote:
> >
> > I support this policy.
> >
> > I was quite surprised by people's comments at the microphone - which
> > seemed to be more being against the proposed than the policy itself.
> >
> > Logic should dictate that this policy passes.
> On the contrary,  several of the comments were clear about the timing of
> the policy.   The discussion as one of them pointed out is whether this is
> required now.   I think there will be a time for this policy but the time
> is not now while we still have addresses in Afrinic.   There is also an
> intra-transfer policy that has been proposed which addresses some of the
> issues raised.
> I do not support this policy at this time.
> -Omo
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list