[rpd] Soft Landing - BIS DRAFT-02-max allocation from/15 to /18

[Mwanguhya Daniel Murungi]

+1 Joe. Looking forward to the policy amendments.   


		_____________________________
From: Joe Kimaili <jkimaili at ubuntunet.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 6:30 AM
Subject: Re: [rpd] Soft Landing - BIS DRAFT-02-max allocation from/15 to /18
To: Benjamin Eshun <beshun at garnet.edu.gh>
Cc: rpd <rpd at afrinic.net>




+1

The authors acknowledge consensus around /18 and will now proceed to prepare an amended version of the policy.On 22 Jun 2016 11:50 pm, "Benjamin Eshun" <beshun at garnet.edu.gh> wrote:
+1  I also support this policy with the /18

Benjamin

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Boubakar Barry <boubakarbarry at gmail.com> wrote:
As I said on the floor in Gaborone, I would also support /18.
Boubakar

On Wednesday, 22 June 2016, Badru Ntege <badru.ntege at nftconsult.com> wrote:
+1

On 6/22/16, 2:11 PM, "Serge Ilunga" <sergekbk at yahoo.fr> wrote:

+1 Noah, /18 is reasonable to start with.
Kind Regards.

Serge IlungaCell: +243814443160Skype: sergekbkR.D.Congo-------- Original message --------From: Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> Date: 06/22/2016  13:26  (GMT+03:00) To: Bope Domilongo Christian <christianbope at gmail.com> Cc: rpd List <rpd at afrinic.net> Subject: Re: [rpd] Soft Landing - BIS DRAFT-02-max allocation from/15 to /18 



On 16 Jun 2016 12:13, "Bope Domilongo Christian" <christianbope at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear authors,
>
> I would like to take this opportunity to follow up some amendment of Soft Landing - BIS DRAFT-02 proposal requested by the community during face-2-face meeting in Botswana.
>
> For those who was not present, I would  briefly explain the rational behind the amendment.
>
> Based on statistic presented:
>
>                  - 91.28 % or 1223/1340 AFRINIC members are small i.e maximum allocation /22
>                  - 8.74 %    or 117/1340  AFRINIC members are medium and above
>  
> Based on this data, we can clearly see that the maximum allocation for should be around /18 instead of /15 as presented in the policy in section,  
> 3.5.1) Exhaustion Phase 1


Yeah, a  /18 sounds reasonable to me as a starter and i think the authors should consider that.


+1 for /18.

>
> Regards,
>
> Bope
>

Noah_______________________________________________RPD mailing listRPD at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd



_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd




	
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20160623/d39a41d8/attachment.html>