Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Soft Landing - BIS DRAFT-02-max allocation from/15 to /18

Joe Kimaili jkimaili at ubuntunet.net
Thu Jun 23 10:24:34 UTC 2016


+1

The authors acknowledge consensus around /18 and will now proceed to
prepare an amended version of the policy.
On 22 Jun 2016 11:50 pm, "Benjamin Eshun" <beshun at garnet.edu.gh> wrote:

> +1  I also support this policy with the /18
>
> Benjamin
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Boubakar Barry <boubakarbarry at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> As I said on the floor in Gaborone, I would also support /18.
>>
>> Boubakar
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, 22 June 2016, Badru Ntege <badru.ntege at nftconsult.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/22/16, 2:11 PM, "Serge Ilunga" <sergekbk at yahoo.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> +1 Noah, /18 is reasonable to start with.
>>>
>>> Kind Regards.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Serge Ilunga*
>>> *Cell: +243814443160 <%2B243814443160>*
>>> *Skype: sergekbk*
>>> *R.D.Congo*
>>> -------- Original message --------
>>> From: Noah <noah at neo.co.tz>
>>> Date: 06/22/2016 13:26 (GMT+03:00)
>>> To: Bope Domilongo Christian <christianbope at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: rpd List <rpd at afrinic.net>
>>> Subject: Re: [rpd] Soft Landing - BIS DRAFT-02-max allocation from/15 to
>>> /18
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16 Jun 2016 12:13, "Bope Domilongo Christian" <
>>> christianbope at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Dear authors,
>>> >
>>> > I would like to take this opportunity to follow up some amendment of
>>> Soft Landing - BIS DRAFT-02 proposal requested by the community during
>>> face-2-face meeting in Botswana.
>>> >
>>> > For those who was not present, I would  briefly explain the rational
>>> behind the amendment.
>>> >
>>> > Based on statistic presented:
>>> >
>>> >                  - 91.28 % or 1223/1340 AFRINIC members are small i.e
>>> maximum allocation /22
>>> >                  - 8.74 %    or 117/1340  AFRINIC members are medium
>>> and above
>>> >
>>> > Based on this data, we can clearly see that the maximum allocation for
>>> should be around /18 instead of /15 as presented in the policy in section,
>>> > 3.5.1) Exhaustion Phase 1
>>>
>>> Yeah, a  /18 sounds reasonable to me as a starter and i think the
>>> authors should consider that.
>>>
>>> +1 for /18.
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> >
>>> > Bope
>>> >
>>>
>>> Noah
>>> _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list
>>> RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RPD mailing list
>> RPD at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20160623/a19bf887/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list