Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Soft Landing - BIS DRAFT-02-max allocation from/15 to /18
boubakarbarry at gmail.com
Wed Jun 22 11:49:02 UTC 2016
As I said on the floor in Gaborone, I would also support /18.
On Wednesday, 22 June 2016, Badru Ntege <badru.ntege at nftconsult.com> wrote:
> On 6/22/16, 2:11 PM, "Serge Ilunga" <sergekbk at yahoo.fr
> +1 Noah, /18 is reasonable to start with.
> Kind Regards.
> *Serge Ilunga*
> *Cell: +243814443160*
> *Skype: sergekbk*
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Noah <noah at neo.co.tz
> Date: 06/22/2016 13:26 (GMT+03:00)
> To: Bope Domilongo Christian <christianbope at gmail.com
> Cc: rpd List <rpd at afrinic.net
> Subject: Re: [rpd] Soft Landing - BIS DRAFT-02-max allocation from/15 to
> On 16 Jun 2016 12:13, "Bope Domilongo Christian" <christianbope at gmail.com
> > Dear authors,
> > I would like to take this opportunity to follow up some amendment of
> Soft Landing - BIS DRAFT-02 proposal requested by the community during
> face-2-face meeting in Botswana.
> > For those who was not present, I would briefly explain the rational
> behind the amendment.
> > Based on statistic presented:
> > - 91.28 % or 1223/1340 AFRINIC members are small i.e
> maximum allocation /22
> > - 8.74 % or 117/1340 AFRINIC members are medium and
> > Based on this data, we can clearly see that the maximum allocation for
> should be around /18 instead of /15 as presented in the policy in section,
> > 3.5.1) Exhaustion Phase 1
> Yeah, a /18 sounds reasonable to me as a starter and i think the authors
> should consider that.
> +1 for /18.
> > Regards,
> > Bope
> _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD