[rpd] Statistics on IPV4 allocation in Africa as of 2016

[ALAIN AINA]

> On Jun 19, 2016, at 1:02 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 18/Jun/16 16:20, ALAIN AINA wrote:
> 
>> Agree. AFRNIC shall understand why they are not willing to deploy the allocated IPv6 and the community shall act as appropriate.
> 
> But what does that mean, exactly? Are we looking to apply some kind of
> peer pressure within our industry? I'd generally leave that to market
> forces, but your idea sounds exciting :-).
> 
>> Agree. But they purse the same objective of Internet Development and work together. The RIR in Number ressources management /distribution and LIRs in their utilisation.There is an intersection point. 
> 
> What/where is that point?
> 
>> 
>> 
>> That is exactly what we are doing. Update the soft landing policy to meet the goal of using the 102/8 to encourage IPv6 deployment. 
>> No space allocation from the last /8 if you can’t  show IPv6.
> 
> I can't argue for or against that, as this is a proposed policy update.
> So I suppose we can have that discussion once the policy update is proposed.


Its been there for a while.

http://www.afrinic.net/en/community/policy-development/policy-proposals/1625-soft-landing-bis-draft-02- <http://www.afrinic.net/en/community/policy-development/policy-proposals/1625-soft-landing-bis-draft-02->

Thanks

—Alain




> 
> Mark.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20160620/a6b6764d/attachment-0001.html>