Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Statistics on IPV4 allocation in Africa as of 2016
aalain at trstech.net
Mon Jun 20 09:15:55 UTC 2016
> On Jun 19, 2016, at 1:02 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
> On 18/Jun/16 16:20, ALAIN AINA wrote:
>> Agree. AFRNIC shall understand why they are not willing to deploy the allocated IPv6 and the community shall act as appropriate.
> But what does that mean, exactly? Are we looking to apply some kind of
> peer pressure within our industry? I'd generally leave that to market
> forces, but your idea sounds exciting :-).
>> Agree. But they purse the same objective of Internet Development and work together. The RIR in Number ressources management /distribution and LIRs in their utilisation.There is an intersection point.
> What/where is that point?
>> That is exactly what we are doing. Update the soft landing policy to meet the goal of using the 102/8 to encourage IPv6 deployment.
>> No space allocation from the last /8 if you can’t show IPv6.
> I can't argue for or against that, as this is a proposed policy update.
> So I suppose we can have that discussion once the policy update is proposed.
Its been there for a while.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD