[rpd] Re: [members-discuss] Board Chair and Vice Chair

[Arnaud AMELINA]

+ 1 on Serge comment.
Board members seeking reelection should vote (or rubber stamp?) anything on
appointing nomcom members or its candidates instead of recusing themselves?

Regards
Le 25 juil. 2015 22:41, "serge ilunga" <sergekbk at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi ,
>
> We can however, state how things actually work.  It seems that you are
> basing your judgement on how you think they work, not how they actually
> work.
> Is that way consolidating the trust we need in our community?
> After the events we have gone through last days (no need to go back), it's
> our responsability to see how we can ensure that the community keep trust
> in the BOD.
> I don't think it will be wise just to sweep it away.
>
> Kind Regards.
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 11:15 PM, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 5:58 PM, serge ilunga <sergekbk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Andrew,
>>>
>>>
>>> We are a community and each one of us can bring his stone to build it.
>>>
>>> I humbly think that trust is critical to the survival of AfriNIC and the
>>> events we have gone through last days has affected this critical pillar.
>>>
>>> We don't have so much time to spend going back and forth on this but to
>>> prevent community members being shouted down or misled, here is a comment :
>>>
>>> A new board member can be as good or better chairs depending on their
>>> involvement in Afrinic so suggesting an issue exists with appointing new
>>> members as chairman is an attempt to exclude and create class structure
>>> among board members .
>>>
>>> Irrespective of what bylaws  say the board and it's chairs have
>>> oversight of all committees and all deliberations in practice even if it's
>>> in a hands off manner.
>>>
>>
>>
>> As a former NomCom Chair, I can tell you that this is not the case.  When
>> I sat on the Nominating Committee, the Board had zero input into
>> deliberations.  The elections and Nominations processes are reported to the
>> Board, but the Board does not provide "oversight".
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> A sitting chairman with divided attention (board work and his election
>>> campaign) cannot be better than a chairman focused on only board work.
>>>
>>> It is constructive proposal to establish the governance committee and
>>> these discussions further illustrate the need.
>>>
>>> We can't sweep it away.
>>>
>>
>>
>> We can however, state how things actually work.  It seems that you are
>> basing your judgement on how you think they work, not how they actually
>> work.
>>
>> --
>>
>> McTim
>> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
>> indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Serge ILUNGA KABWIKA*
> *Skype: sergekbk*
> *Cell: +243814443160 <%2B243814443160>*
>
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20150726/ddfb622a/attachment.html>