Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[members-discuss] Re: [rpd] [afnog] A typical case of abuse of our resources!!!

Seun Ojedeji seun.ojedeji at
Sun Sep 21 21:52:22 UTC 2014

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 21 Sep 2014 20:01, "Mark Slingsby" <mark at> wrote:
> Policy or no policy, should this organisation be granted these IP’s? It
seems we all know the answer to this.
Interesting use of "we" in this context ;)

> If we don’t already have, we need a policy to say that 95% of the IP’s
must be used within the region.
There is a related policy proposal currently under discussion, you may want
to submit your view to the author about it through the rpd list.

> Do we have stats on how many of each IP range size are allocated each
I know there is allocation stats available on the AfriNIC website.

And how many requested & rejected?
Perhaps it may be good to have this summary during public policy Meeting or
AGM, not sure about how NDA will go along with this.

> Anything bigger than a /XX should be referred to the community? I haven’t
mentioned a size because it shouldn’t be overly onerous.
Interesting perspective, you may want to turn this into a policy proposal.
However, it may be good you clearly define the community in this context.[1]

1. Especially the practicality of turning a resource request to an
unlimited community.
> Regards,
> Mark_______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list