Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Re: [afnog] A typical case of abuse of our resources!!!

Keshwarsingh Nadan keshwarsingh.nadan at
Sat Sep 20 18:31:22 UTC 2014


>On 19 September 2014 14:51, Kofi ANSA AKUFO <kofi.ansa at> wrote:
>Who approved such huge chunk /12 (over a million IPv4 addresses) in a first
(initial) time request? >
>As much as we want different,  Universities and NRENs are being treated in
line with policy.  Why was this allocation treated differently?  Are there
any others getting preferential treatment that is not guided by "rule >of

To all of the above, AFRINIC will never disclose such information
(confidentiality clause), but there exists two possibilities which can
override, I'm not sure on the first one:

a) As a member, clause 7.6(viii) can be invoked by passing  a special
resolution signed by at least 5% of the members requesting the board for
further clarification. I can show up by aggregating all my resource holder
organizations (28), but I'm not sure AFRINIC would consider since they have
a pending legal issue against me. Will you and others follow this route by
summing up to 5% ?

b) If you want an unbiased statement (who/why) on the /12 chunk, AFRINIC
being incorporated under the companies act 2001 of Mauritius, we can request
the 'Independent Commission Against Corruption' to investigate. As a member
I want to know more about Mr. Lu's allocation, care to know more ? Shoot me
off list.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6435 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list