Search RPD Archives
[afnog] [rpd] Re: A typical case of abuse of our resources!!!
sfolayan at gmail.com
Sat Sep 20 21:53:09 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 20/09/2014 19:31, Keshwarsingh Nadan wrote:
>> On 19 September 2014 14:51, Kofi ANSA AKUFO <kofi.ansa at gmail.com>
>> wrote: Who approved such huge chunk /12 (over a million IPv4
>> addresses) in a first
> (initial) time request? >
>> As much as we want different, Universities and NRENs are being
>> treated in
> line with policy. Why was this allocation treated differently?
> Are there any others getting preferential treatment that is not
> guided by "rule >of law"?
> To all of the above, AFRINIC will never disclose such information
> (confidentiality clause), but there exists two possibilities which
> can override, I'm not sure on the first one:
> a) As a member, clause 7.6(viii) can be invoked by passing a
> special resolution signed by at least 5% of the members requesting
> the board for further clarification. I can show up by aggregating
> all my resource holder organizations (28), but I'm not sure AFRINIC
> would consider since they have a pending legal issue against me.
> Will you and others follow this route by summing up to 5% ?
> b) If you want an unbiased statement (who/why) on the /12 chunk,
> AFRINIC being incorporated under the companies act 2001 of
> Mauritius, we can request the 'Independent Commission Against
> Corruption' to investigate. As a member I want to know more about
> Mr. Lu's allocation, care to know more ? Shoot me off list.
Off list? so much for transparency!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the RPD