[AfriNIC-rpd] Opposition to AFPUB-2010-v4-005-draft-01

[Stacy Hughes]

Hi McTim!

Here we go:

*3.5.2)* Exhaustion Phase 2

During this phase a minimum allocation/assignment size will be /27. And a
maximum of /22 per allocation/assignment.
Cheers,
Stacy

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:21 PM, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear IP Goddess,
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Stacy Hughes <ipgoddess.arin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Esteemed Colleagues,
> > I must speak in opposition to this proposal.
> > First, I am philosophically opposed to soft landing proposals in general.
> >  When the party is over, it's time to go home.  We don't get 5 more
> minutes
> > or more birthday cake.
>
> Have you ever been to a 1st graders birthday party???....they get the
> 5 more minutes AND more cake...I experienced this first hand a few
> days ago ;-/
>
>   Incorporation of and transition to IPv6 is the way
> > forward, and necessary for all of us.
>
>
> Full ACK
>
> >
> > I especially disagree with direct assignments or allocations of IPv4
> space
> > in subnets of longer prefix lengths than /24.
>
> Does this proposal do that?  If so, I must have missed that in this
> iteration.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20110228/f1d37c51/attachment.html>