Search RPD Archives
[AfriNIC-rpd] Opposition to AFPUB-2010-v4-005-draft-01
dogwallah at gmail.com
Mon Feb 28 21:21:47 UTC 2011
Dear IP Goddess,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Stacy Hughes <ipgoddess.arin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Esteemed Colleagues,
> I must speak in opposition to this proposal.
> First, I am philosophically opposed to soft landing proposals in general.
> When the party is over, it's time to go home. We don't get 5 more minutes
> or more birthday cake.
Have you ever been to a 1st graders birthday party???....they get the
5 more minutes AND more cake...I experienced this first hand a few
days ago ;-/
Incorporation of and transition to IPv6 is the way
> forward, and necessary for all of us.
> I especially disagree with direct assignments or allocations of IPv4 space
> in subnets of longer prefix lengths than /24.
Does this proposal do that? If so, I must have missed that in this iteration.
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
More information about the RPD