[AfriNIC-rpd] Comments about AFPUB-2010-GEN-005

[Chris Grundemann]

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 05:44, Dr Paulos Nyirenda <paulos at sdnp.org.mw> wrote:
>
> It seems clear from this discussion then that:
>
> 1. PDP-WG co-chairs do have to make important decisions in AFPUB-2010-GEN-005,
>
> 2. AFPUB-2010-GEN-005 does not create a "lead chair"
>
> 3. Conflicts among co-chairs are a real potential threat in AFPUB-2010-GEN-005 and in
> policy development in the AfriNIC region.
>
> 4. There is need to revise AFPUB-2010-GEN-005 to alleviate such conflicts.
>
> 5. Possible revision areas include creation of an odd number of co-chairs or creation of
> a lead chair in AFPUB-2010-GEN-005

Well put.

FWIW, I think that expanding the number of co-chairs to three is a
much better option than having a lead chair. By expanding to three,
you create a situation where at least two co-chairs have to agree
rather than giving a single lead chair final say unilaterally.

Cheers,
~Chris

>
> Regards,
>
> Paulos
> ======================
> Dr Paulos B Nyirenda
> NIC.MW & .mw ccTLD
> http://www.registrar.mw
>
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
>

-- 
@ChrisGrundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.burningwiththebush.com
www.theIPv6experts.com
www.coisoc.org