[DBWG] --list-versions query on deleted resources?

Noah noah at neo.co.tz
Wed Feb 24 18:26:01 UTC 2021


On Wed, 24 Feb 2021, 12:58 Ben Maddison via DBWG, <dbwg at afrinic.net> wrote:


> Hi Nishal,

>

> On 02/23, Nishal Goburdhan wrote:

> > On 3 Feb 2021, at 7:39, Nishal Goburdhan wrote:

> > > On 5 Jan 2021, at 11:59, Edrich de Lange wrote:

> > > > On 4 Dec 2020, at 9:41, Ben Maddison via DBWG wrote:

> > > >

> > > > > Hi all,

> > > > >

> > > > > The list got left off of Michel's initial response to my email,

> > > > > and we

> > > > > only noticed once several further replies had been exchanged.

> > > > >

> > > > > See the reconstructed exchange below.

> > > > > TL;DR: Should prior versions of deleted objects remain query-able?

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > Most definitely.

> > > > Kind regards

> > >

> > >

> > > dear working group.

> >

> > dear co-chairs,

> >

> >

> > > there have now been three statements supporting the request for

> historic

> > > information to be made available (aka “whowas”)

> > > there has been admission that this is possible, and “easy” to do.

> > > there have been no statements indicating that this is a bad thing to

> do.

> > >

> > > in the absence of any dissenting views, what is necessary to move this

> > > forward?

> >

> > ever mindful that i might have forgotten the procedure, could you please

> > respond to this mundane question?

> >

> Absent progress on re-chartering, I'm not sure there is a "procedure"

> for us to follow, as such.

>

> (Aside: the re-chartering is mostly in my court. Apologies for the lack

> of progress. I will dedicate some attention to this within the next few

> days)

>

> Lacking that, I would suggest that *on this item*:

> - We await the outcome of the legal due diligence that Yogesh has

> indicated is being done;

> - Assuming that comes back with a thumbs-up, we take some time to

> provide our input as a WG on the details of the implementation we

> would like to see, with a view to arriving at something the staff

> considers deployable; and

> - Do a quick last call on the proposed solution (maybe 1-2 weeks) to

> give stragglers an opportunity to be heard.

>


+1 sounds like a plan.....

Noah
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/dbwg/attachments/20210224/2b1cebe4/attachment.html>


More information about the DBWG mailing list