[Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Update on legal case

Ali Hussein ali at hussein.me.ke
Tue Jul 27 09:47:25 UTC 2021


I have been following this saga for a few days now and I can't help but
wonder (And this is aside from discussing the case of Cloud Innovation and
AfriNIC) I want to address the process of Mauritian law.

How does a court in Mauritius freeze the bank accounts of another company
through ex parte proceedings? For those who might not understand what I
mean - *ex parte is **done with respect to or in the interests of one side
only or of an interested outside party. *This is a basic tenet in law. Was
Afrinic given an opportunity to defend itself before these orders to freeze
its accounts were given? Or were summons given and Afrinic ignored them?

If the former is true then maybe it's time to address the issue of the
domicility of Afrinic. Maybe Mauritius is too hostile for a
Pan-African-based organization. How else do you interpreter this? A court
giving an unprecedented ex parte ruling against an African Organization in
favor of a Hongkong-based organization who we are all clear is a purveyor
of African IP Addresses to organizations outside of Africa as its core
business model.

Let's put aside all this hullabaloo of ohh...The board didn't do
this...Oooh the board should have done this! and let's address the elephant
in the room. Everything else is a sideshow.


*Ali Hussein*

Digital Transformation


Tel: +254 713 601113

Twitter: @AliHKassim

Skype: abu-jomo

LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim
<http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim>




Any information of a personal nature expressed in this email are purely
mine and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the
organizations that I work with.


On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:31 AM Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com>
wrote:


> In message <9C433F54-9167-45D9-8B3C-F50998E6E32C at delong.com>,

> Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:

>

> >> That is certainly NOT a document that I have seen.

> >

> >Understandable, since as I stated, it was a private message sent by

> >Respondent to Petitioner.

> >

> >I am seeking approval from our legal team to provide it.

>

> Well, no offense Owen, but I also have in my posession a document that

> definitively proves that you are Satan. I would like to share that

> with everyone, but my lawyer won't let me. Until he does however

> I think that everyone should just take it on faith, because I'm

> always right and I never lie.

> :-)

>

>

> Regards,

> rfg

>

> _______________________________________________

> Community-Discuss mailing list

> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20210727/069145be/attachment.html>


More information about the Community-Discuss mailing list