[Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Faulty result for Western Africa in AfriNIC AGMM Elections
owen at delong.com
Thu Jun 7 14:16:45 UTC 2018
The result is not broken. The guidelines need to be improved to avoid the potential for the proposed alternate and illogical conclusion and provide greater clarity.
That can be achieved without further answers from board, legal, or CEO. I realize that doesn’t provide the outcome that those who proposed this illogical (albeit literal) alternative interpretation were hoping for, but it is the only rational outcome.
> On Jun 7, 2018, at 06:34, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, 12:44 p.m. Ben Roberts, <Ben.Roberts at liquidtelecom.com> wrote:
>> But isn’t this an academic discussion?
>> I’m not seeing any of the candidates that were rejected by majority by the members raising any requests to appeal?
> We have major issues that need answers in order to fix the flaws that are apparently being avoided by those tasked with answers.
> If the board or the CEO or the legal counsel dodges answering some of this questions then how shall we fix what is clearly broken.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Community-Discuss