[Community-Discuss] Limit on the number of proxies

[Saul Stein]

Personally i would like to focus on removing the need to have proxies in the first place.

We need to be able to easily vote for elections, resolutions and policy online. 
Open the voting a week before and keep it open x days after to enable people who are away to catchup and vote. 

This would resolve the need for people to carry proxies and thus the possibility to sway results  

Saul
Sent from my iPhone

> On 13 Nov 2016, at 08:20, Alan Barrett <alan.barrett at afrinic.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 13 Nov 2016, at 09:56, Badru Ntege <badru.ntege at nftconsult.com> wrote:
>> I think this can be brought to rest if we get a position from the Afrinic Legal council then subsequent legal discussion would be based on a fixed organisational position.  
> 
> I have requested a clear statement from the Afrinic legal adviser.
> 
> However, I am more interested in learning what the members or community would like in the future.
> 
> Three obvious possibilities are:
> 
> * Remove the proxy limits;
> 
> * Keep the proxy limits, but modify the wording of the bylaws to ensure that the bylaws do not conflict with the Companies Act;
> 
> * Keep the bylaws unchanged, and deal with any legal challenges if they arise.
> 
> 
> Alan Barrett
> _______________________________________________
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss