[Community-Discuss] Bylaws changes
ALAIN AINA
aalain at trstech.net
Fri Nov 11 14:29:36 UTC 2016
> On Nov 10, 2016, at 12:54 AM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 03:14 , ALAIN AINA <aalain at trstech.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 3:01 PM, Alan Barrett <alan.barrett at afrinic.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 9 Nov 2016, at 16:16, ALAIN AINA <aalain at trstech.net> wrote:
>>>> Hmmm. Are we moving the PDPWG powers in board hands? I do not understand the concept of deadlock in our bottom-up PDP ruled by "Rough Consensus” and not “Full Consensus". I would expect to see all times, effort made by all parties(including board) to reach rough consensus on adoption/rejection… and not board making decisions. Is this not a discussion for the PDPWG ?
>>>
>>> The Bylaws have always given the Board the power to make policy without going throgh the PDWG process. The Board has never exercised that power in the past, but the ability is there in the Bylaws in case a good reason appears in the future. We are talking about reducing that power so that the Board cannot abuse it.
>>
>> Good Alan, but the way it was presented does not sound same as your last text.
>> But It was also proposed to just remove board adopting policy from bylaws and only depend on the PDP. May be an updated version of the PDP ?
>
> I’m having trouble parsing this, but any of the parsings I came up with seem to indicate that you are reading a different list than I am reading because that is not at all what I have seen proposed here.
https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/2016-June/000343.html <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/2016-June/000343.html> response to point 12
One should admit that the format of the discussions on this important accountability improvement does not make it easy to follow and digest, but other alternatives suggested were not accepted.
Thanks
—Alain
>
> Owen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20161111/1c98b06c/attachment.html>
More information about the Community-Discuss
mailing list