[Community-Discuss] Resolution 201604.274 about Set-Up fees
Diana Ikwuagwu
diana.ikwuagwu at unn.edu.ng
Wed Jun 29 14:25:25 UTC 2016
I think it will be very good if the membership maintenance price be
lowered. Please let the board look into this.
Ogoo
On 6/28/16, Keshwarsingh Nadan <kn at millenium.net.mu> wrote:
> Dear Chair,
>
>
>
> 1. The Board has always been responsible for setting the fees. "Review"
> includes the right to change the fees.
>
>
>
> Agree on this one.
>
>
>
> 2. The problem being addressed is that every allocation or assignment event
> requires effort from staff, and it is not fair for that effort to sometimes
> be undertaken free of charge.
>
>
>
> The staff has always been and is presently remunerated for that effort, so
> how come that remunerated effort is sometimes undertaken free of charge ?
> Underpaid staff ?
>
>
>
> 3. AFRINIC requires more revenue, not less.
>
>
>
> Why does AFRINIC requires more revenue ? For what purpose ?
>
>
>
> 4. If the proposed charging scheme had been in place during 2015, then
> income from allocation and assignment fees would have been about USD 550k.
> Actual income from allocation and assignment fees in 2015 was about USD
> 350k. Therefore, the clarification that allocation or assignment fees are
> once per allocation or assignment, not once per member, is expected to raise
> about USD 200k per year.
>
>
>
> Motive behind an expected US $200k/yr?
>
>
>
> 5. Since it is being introduced in the middle of 2016, the impact on the
> 2016 revenue is expected to be an additional USD 100k.
>
>
>
> Motive behind an expected additional US $100k for 2016?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> K
>
More information about the Community-Discuss
mailing list