[AFRI-Discuss] [AfrICANN-discuss] Re: Joint meeting of African community in BUENOS AIRES"African views on the Proposal of the Governance of Internet uniqueidentifiers"

Douglas Onyango ondouglas at gmail.com
Tue Jun 23 15:28:37 UTC 2015 

All,
My updated contribution is below:

- The expected composition of PTI Board which is proposed to be
sourced internally as determined by ICANN Board is acceptable. However
we understand that the role of the  PTI Board would be minimal hence
we expect that the selection of its members would be largely done in
the public interests. We also hope that in the inclusion of 2 members
of PTI Board to be  populated by the Nominating Committee, geographic
diversity after competence is highly ensured in its selection process.

I have an issue with our position here. My belief is that setting up
PTI as a separate entity isn't just perfunctory, but among other
things, an attempt at  segregation of duties between the policy making
and implementation arm of the IANA function. Against this backdrop, I
feel that the proposal to have an ICANN-designated PTI board could
breed undue influence on the activities of the PTI, create complacancy
and leaves room for conflict of interest to arise. If this
is an opinion shared by other people, I would like to offer the
following text to articulate it.


- Because we feel the creation of PTI, and its subsequent Board are to
serve the object of segregation of duties between the policy making
and implementation arm of the IANA function, among other things, we
are concerned about the potential ramifications of the option to have
an ICANN-designated PTI Board.
Whereas we understand that the role of the PTI Board would be minimal,
we still think an ICANN-designated PTI Board creates the possibility
of undue influence over the PTI, complacency and room for conflicts of
interest. We therefore urge that the proposal rethinks the composition
of the PTI board and or puts in place safe guards against the issues
raised above.
We expect that the selection of the PTI Board would be largely done in
the public interests and that in the inclusion of 2 further members of
the PTI Board nominated by the Nominating Committee to we ensure
geographic diversity and competency.

On 23 June 2015 at 11:19, Douglas Onyango <ondouglas at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
> Sorry for the late response, but I have  once contribution regarding
> this paragraph.
>
> - The expected composition of PTI Board which is proposed to be
> sourced internally as determined by ICANN Board is acceptable. However
> we understand that the role of the  PTI Board would be minimal hence
> we expect that the selection of its members would be largely done in
> the public interests. We also hope that in the inclusion of 2 members
> of PTI Board to be  populated by the Nominating Committee, geographic
> diversity after competence is highly ensured in its selection process.
>
> I have an issue with our position here. My belief is that setting up
> PTI as a separate entity isn't perfunctory, but among other things, an
> attempt at segregation of duties between the policy making and
> implementation arm of the IANA function. Against this backdrop, I feel
> that having a PTI board constituted of many ICANN board members
> creates undue influence of the activities of the PTI, creates
> complacancy and leaves room for conflict of interest to arise. If this
> is an opinion shared by other people, I would like to offer the
> following text to articulate it.
>
>
> - Because we feel the creation of PTI, and its subsequent Board are to
> serve the object of segregation of duties between the policy making
> and implementation arm of the IANA function, among other things, we
> are concerned about the proposal to source the Board internally - as
> determined by ICANN Board.
> Whereas we understand that the role of PTI Board would be minimal, we
> still think an ICANN-lead PTI Board creates undue influence over the
> PTI, creates complacency and leaves room for conflict of interest to
> arise. We therefore urge that the proposal rethinks the composition of
> the PTI board or puts in place safe guards against the issues raised
> above. We expect that the selection of the PTI Board would be largely
> done in the public interests and that in the inclusion of 2 members of
> PTI Board by the Nominating Committee ensures geographic diversity and
> competency.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> On 22 June 2015 at 14:08, Matogoro Jabera <jaberamatogoro at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello Members,
>>
>> It happen that, the University of Dodoma, Tanzania hosted a remote hub
>> on ICANN53 and managed to ask a number questions on CWG and CCWG and
>> one of our main question was, regardless with the fact that Africa is
>> the second largest continents still it representation is NOT promising
>> as compared to other continent. The question was what lesson should we
>> get from this statistics? Panelist has answered it correctly and said
>> we still have a chance to participate more.
>>
>> Much appreciation to ICANN to recognize the role of Dk. Nii, it was
>> real pleasure to see this from Africa.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matogoro
>>
>> On 6/22/15, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello Tijani,
>>>
>>> Sure, we have actually indicated earlier (which was suggested by Muwendwa
>>> and supported by a number of people including myself) that statement for
>>> numbers/protocol can be sent in for incorporation. So we can add up
>>> Muwendwa's statement as the numbers part of the overall statement, although
>>> it would have been very helpful if it came earlier than now. Nevertheless
>>> its better late than never and i hope the community would review the
>>> statement provided by Muwendwa and suggest further edits accordingly.
>>>
>>> If anyone wants to write something about protocol parameters, it will be
>>> helpful as well. I believe there will still be room to edit this during the
>>> face 2 face meeting.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Tijani BENJEMAA
>>> <tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Seun,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Since we called our statement: “our views on the proposed future
>>>> governance of Internet Unique Identifiers”, we may add Mwendwa text and
>>>> modify the introduction to include the numbering function.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
>>>>
>>>> Executive Director
>>>>
>>>> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
>>>>
>>>> Phone:  + 216 41 649 605
>>>>
>>>> Mobile: + 216 98 330 114
>>>>
>>>> Fax:       + 216 70 853 376
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *De :* afri-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:
>>>> afri-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] *De la part de* Seun
>>>> Ojedeji
>>>> *Envoyé :* lundi 22 juin 2015 15:23
>>>> *À :* Mwendwa Kivuva
>>>> *Cc :* Afri-Discuss; AfrICANN list; Afrinic-discuss
>>>> *Objet :* Re: [AFRI-Discuss] [AfrICANN-discuss] Re: Joint meeting of
>>>> African community in BUENOS AIRES"African views on the Proposal of the
>>>> Governance of Internet uniqueidentifiers"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Muwendwa,
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Mwendwa Kivuva <
>>>> Kivuva at transworldafrica.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am still not in agreement with this statement:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  -       We observe that the CWG proposes to transfer IANA assets
>>>> including the IANA trademarks; we are in disagreement with this as we
>>>> will
>>>> prefer that the trademarks remain with the contractor post-transition
>>>> (which is ICANN). Nevertheless we suggest that the 3 operational
>>>> communities cordinate and agree on this. Our main interest is that
>>>> whoever
>>>> holds the trademark makes it available/accessible to the operational
>>>> communities as it is at the moment.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> First of all, does the CWG propose to transfer IANA assets?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here is a section of the proposal:
>>>>
>>>> A new, separate legal entity, Post-Transition IANA (PTI), will be formed
>>>> as an affiliate of ICANN. The existing IANA functions, administrative
>>>> staff, and *related* *resources*, processes, data, and know-how will be
>>>> legally transferred to PTI.
>>>>
>>>>  Trademark:
>>>>
>>>> [ICANN will grants PTI an* exclusive*, royalty-free, fully-paid,
>>>> worldwide license to use the IANA trademark and all related trademarks in
>>>> connection with PTI’s activities under the ICANN-PTI Contract.]
>>>>
>>>>   Full proposal ur: https://goo.gl/6UNbys
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Who is in disagreement with the transfer of the IANA assets?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually the statement is not to disagree with transfer of IANA assets
>>>> but
>>>> specifically transfer of IANA trademark. Nevertheless i think i agree
>>>> that
>>>> the current statement may be a little bit confusing, so i suggest the
>>>> following edit:
>>>>
>>>> "We observe that the CWG proposes to grant "exclusive" access of IANA
>>>> trademark to PTI; we are in disagreement with this as we will prefer that
>>>> the trademark remain with the contractor post-transition (which is ICANN)
>>>> as its an asset for the 3 operational communities. Nevertheless we
>>>> suggest
>>>> that the 3 operational communities coordinate and agree on this. Our main
>>>> interest is that whoever holds the trademark makes it
>>>> available/accessible
>>>> to the operational communities as it is at the moment."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  I have stated here that no feedback has come from the community whether
>>>> we agree or disagree on the transfer. I may be wrong, but any pointers
>>>> would be appreciated. However, I agree consensus between the three
>>>> operational communities is important.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Meanwhile, below is the statement I recommend we adopt on the numbers
>>>> community. I have produced this draft in my personal capacity. Any
>>>> feedback
>>>> is highly welcomed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please note that the statement we are currently working on attempts to
>>>> comment on the CWG proposal and CCWG proposal/report NOT the CRISP
>>>> proposal
>>>>
>>>> I hope that helps.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <begin text>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The number resource community has proposed an SLA with the IANA Function
>>>> Operator (IFO), a Review Committee to review the functions of IFO, and
>>>> transfer of the Intellectual Property related to the IANA functions  held
>>>> by ICANN to a neutral entity. The African community welcomes the view
>>>> from
>>>> the numbers community that the RIRs are "very satisfied with the
>>>> performance of ICANN in the role of the IANA Numbering Services Operator.
>>>> Taking this into account, and considering the Internet Number Community's
>>>> strong desire for stability and a minimum of operational change, the
>>>> Internet Number Community believes that ICANN should remain in the role
>>>> of
>>>> the IANA Numbering Services Operator for at least the initial term of the
>>>> new contract."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We also appreciate the fact that the numbering community chose
>>>>  arbitration over litigation in the unlikely event there are disputes
>>>> related to the execution of the IANA functions where mediation has
>>>> failed. Arbitration avoids hostility, is cheaper, faster, and more
>>>> flexible
>>>> than litigation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is the expectation of the AFRALO/AFRICANN community that the proposed
>>>> Review Committee is formed in an open and transparent manner, with
>>>> balanced
>>>> representation from the 5 RIRs and composed of members who are well
>>>> conversant with the operations of the RIRs and analytical enough to give
>>>> a
>>>> scorecard on the performance of the IFO.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is also the expectation of the AFRALO /AFRICANN community that the
>>>> three operational communities will reach consensus on the ownership and
>>>> use
>>>> of the iana.org domain name and the IANA trademark. It is our expectation
>>>> that any Intellectual Property held by ICANN related to the IANA
>>>> functions
>>>> is available in perpetuity to the three operation communities.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is important for the three operational communities to ensure the
>>>> proposals submitted to ICG are compatible to avoid protracted
>>>> negotiations
>>>> and back and forth with ICG because this may affect the timelines given.
>>>> Finally, It is the expectation of the Africa community that commitment is
>>>> shown by the three operational communities, and the ICG in ensuring that
>>>> the transition will happen on time, and timelines are adhered to.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <end text>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    ______________________
>>>> Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya
>>>>
>>>> "There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, till all men walk on
>>>> higher ground in that lifetime." - Maxwell Anderson
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21 June 2015 at 11:53, Ben Fuller <abutiben at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The Multistakeholder model is the best option we have to develop ICT's in
>>>> Africa. We have to get this transition right. .Na has been busy with the
>>>> CCWG and there are issues with both the outcome and the process.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The work and analysis everyone has put into the statement is impressive.
>>>> We need to keep it up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ben
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad Mini
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 21, 2015, at 03:43, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    Dear All,
>>>>
>>>> I have edited the version from Dave (which is an update on Beran's
>>>> version). I accepted most of Dave's edits but left some within the CCWG
>>>> section for Tijani to have further look as i think the membership
>>>> comments
>>>> was actually to indicate how problematic membership model can be and why
>>>> we
>>>> should not go that route.
>>>>
>>>> I have also added a few statement to reflect/cover Muwendwa's
>>>> suggestion/comment and i hope that will help
>>>>
>>>> Attached is the redline version
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Dave Kissoondoyal <dave at isoc-mu.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear Tijani,
>>>>
>>>> I have done some changes (changes are tracked in the document) and please
>>>> feel free to amend where necessary.
>>>>
>>>> Also instead of asking a question in the document, it is better to come
>>>> with
>>>> a recommendation.
>>>> I have modified the following to the paragraph below:
>>>>
>>>> •       The final aim of the CCWG work is to enhance the Accountability
>>>> to
>>>> the community . The membership model would enhance the accountability of
>>>> the
>>>> board to the ICANN members, but how do we ensure that the ICANN members
>>>> will
>>>> be accountable to the community???? With the membership model, we do not
>>>> solve it but instead move the accountability issue from the board to the
>>>> members
>>>>
>>>> •       The final aim of the CCWG work is to enhance the Accountability
>>>> to
>>>> the community in a transparent manner. The membership model would enhance
>>>> the accountability of the board to the ICANN members. With the membership
>>>> model, we do not solve the accountability problem but instead shift the
>>>> issue from the board to the members.
>>>> •       Therefore we recommend that checks and balances should be put in
>>>> place at the membership level to ensure that the members are accountable
>>>> to
>>>> the community.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks and best regards
>>>>
>>>> Dave Kissoondoyal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: afri-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>> [mailto:afri-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of
>>>> tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn
>>>> Sent: 20 June 2015 14:12
>>>> To: Beran Dondeh; tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn
>>>> Cc: Afri-Discuss; Alan Greenberg; AfrICANN List; Afrinic-discuss
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFRI-Discuss] Joint meeting of African community in BUENOS
>>>> AIRES"African views on the Proposal of the Governance of Internet
>>>> uniqueidentifiers"
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much Beran for your review. It is really helpful.
>>>>
>>>> I accepted almost all your language corrections except one that I found
>>>> not
>>>> too correct. Perhaps Seun can find with you the best text.
>>>>
>>>> As for your question about the word "un-interested", the meaning we
>>>> intent
>>>> was that it is done not for particular or private interest, but only for
>>>> the
>>>> public interest.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again
>>>>
>>>> Tijani
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On ven 19/06/15 11:43 , Beran Dondeh <berandondeh at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Dear Aziz, Tijani et al,
>>>> >
>>>> > Please find attached an edited version of the English Document with
>>>> > tracked changes. I would also like to slightly edit Tijani's suggested
>>>> > additions.
>>>> >
>>>> > • The final aim of the CCWG work is to enhance the Accountability to
>>>> > the community. The membership model would enhance the accountability
>>>> > of the board to the ICANN members, but how do we ensure that the ICANN
>>>> > members will be accountable to the community???? With the membership
>>>> > model, we do not solve it but instead move the accountability issue
>>>> > from the board to the members Thank you and regards
>>>> >
>>>> > Beran Gillen
>>>> >
>>>> > On Jun 19, 2015, at 9:02 PM, tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Dear Aziz and all,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > May I add a paragraph to the accountability part of our statement
>>>> > before the last bullet point in the following mannar:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > • All the accountability mechanisms should avoid leading to courts
>>>> > > as
>>>> > much as possible. In fact, we do not accept that ICANN affairs be
>>>> > managed by courts in whatever jurisdiction. ICANN is an example of a
>>>> > triving multistakeholder community and we should endeavor to protect
>>>> > that as much as possible.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Added paragraph:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > • The final aim of the CCWG work is to enhance the Accountability to
>>>> > the community. The membership model would enhance the
>>>> > > accountability of the board to the ICANN members, but how we can
>>>> > > ensure
>>>> > that the ICANN members will be accountable to the
>>>> > > community???? With the membership model, we move the accountability
>>>> > issue from the board to the members, but we do not solve
>>>> > > it.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > • The community group that will act on behalf of the respective
>>>> > community stakeholders to exercise the powers mentioned in the report
>>>> > should be as inclusive as possible. We prefer equal footing for all
>>>> > SOs and ACs, but can live with the composition proposed in the report.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Finally, we reiterate our support to the CWG-Stewardship and the
>>>> > CCWG-Accountability groups and appreciate the progress made so far.
>>>> > However, we think that their proposals need further work to find the
>>>> > right multi-stakeholder solution for the stewardship transition and
>>>> > the best ways to empower the community using the right means and
>>>> > avoiding ICANN the risk of being weakened or loose its independence,
>>>> > its inclusiveness and its multi-stakeholder nature.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Tijani
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On mer 17/06/15 8:54 , Aziz Hilali  wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >> [English]
>>>> > >> Dear colleagues,
>>>> > >> AFRALO will hold the traditional joint meeting AFRALO/AfrICANN
>>>> > >> during
>>>> > the
>>>> > >> ICANN meeting next week in Buenos Aires. The theme proposed by the
>>>> > members
>>>> > >> of AFRALO will be "African views on the Proposal of the Governance
>>>> > >> of Internet unique identifiers".
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> You will find attached the draft statement in English (French
>>>> > translation
>>>> > >> is in progress, it will be sent on the list tomorrow) of the joint
>>>> > >> AFRALO/AfrICANN meeting due to take place on Wednesday 24 June 2015.
>>>> > >> Would you please provide your comments on this draft before the end
>>>> > >> of Saturday, June 20,2015, to allow us to include them before
>>>> > >> printing
>>>> > the
>>>> > >> final version and then distribute it to the participants in the
>>>> > meeting for
>>>> > >> discussion, modification if any and adoption.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> [French]
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Chers collègues,
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> AFRALO organisera la traditionnelle réunion conjointe AFRALO /
>>>> > AfrICANN
>>>> > >> lors de la réunion de l'ICANN qui aura lieu la semaine prochaine à
>>>> > Buenos
>>>> > >> Aires. Le thème proposé par les membres d’AFRALO sera "Points de
>>>> > vue
>>>> > >> africains sur la proposition de la gouvernance du système des
>>>> > >> identificateurs uniques de l'Internet".
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> En fichier attaché, prière trouver le projet de déclaration (la
>>>> > >> traduction française est en cours de préparation et sera transmise
>>>> > sur la
>>>> > >> liste demain) de la réunion conjointe AFRALO – AfrICANN qui aura
>>>> > lieu à
>>>> > >> Buenos Aires le Mercredi 24 Juin 2015.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Je vous prie de donner vos remarques sur ce projet au plus tard le
>>>> > Samedi
>>>> > >> 20 Juin 2015, pour que l’on puisse les inclure avant d’imprimer la
>>>> > >> version finale et ensuite la distribuer aux participants à la
>>>> > réunion
>>>> > >> pour discussion, modification s’il y a lieu et adoption.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Best Regards
>>>> > >> Aziz Hilali
>>>> > >> AFRALO Chair _______________________________________________
>>>> > >> AFRI-Discuss mailing list
>>>> > >> AFRI-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>> > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss [1]
>>>> > >> [1]
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Homepage for the region: http://www.afralo.org [2] [2]
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to
>>>> > this
>>>> > >> list are more accurate:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.
>>>> > html
>>>> > [3]#
>>>> > >> anexo1[3]
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Links:
>>>> > >> ------
>>>> > >> [1]
>>>> > >>
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=https://atlarge-lists.ican
>>>> > n.org
>>>> > [4]
>>>> > >> /mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss[2]
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://www.afralo.org [5]
>>>> > >> [3]
>>>> > >>
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://www.funredes.org/mi
>>>> > stica
>>>> > [6]
>>>> > >> /english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html%23anexo1
>>>> > >>
>>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>>> > > AFRI-Discuss mailing list
>>>> > > AFRI-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss [7]
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Homepage for the region: http://www.afralo.org [8]
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to
>>>> > this list are more accurate:
>>>> > http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.
>>>> > html#
>>>> > anexo1[9]
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Links:
>>>> > ------
>>>> > [1]
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=https://atlarge-lists.ican
>>>>
>>>> > n.org /mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss[2]
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://www.afralo.org
>>>> > [3]
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://www.funredes.org/mi
>>>> > stica /english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html[4]
>>>> >
>>>> http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse
>>>> .
>>>> > php%3Fredirect%3Dhttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org[5]
>>>> >
>>>> http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse
>>>> .
>>>> > php%3Fredirect%3Dhttp://www.afralo.org[6]
>>>> >
>>>> http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse
>>>> .
>>>> > php%3Fredirect%3Dhttp://www.funredes.org/mistica[7]
>>>> <http://www.funredes.org/mistica%5B7%5D>
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=https://atlarge-lists.ican
>>>> > n.org /mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss[8]
>>>>
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://www.afralo.org
>>>> > [9]
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://www.funredes.org/mi
>>>> > stica
>>>> > /english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html%23anexo1
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> AFRI-Discuss mailing list
>>>> AFRI-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss
>>>>
>>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.afralo.org
>>>>
>>>> Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to this
>>>> list are more accurate:
>>>> http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html#anexo1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Seun Ojedeji, Federal University Oye-Ekiti web:      *
>>>> *http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> **Mobile:
>>>> +2348035233535 <%2B2348035233535>*
>>>> *alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
>>>> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>>>>
>>>> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   <AFRALO-AfrICANN Statement_draft_v1.1_redine.doc>
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>> AfrICANN mailing list
>>>> AfrICANN at afrinic.net
>>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> AfrICANN mailing list
>>>> AfrICANN at afrinic.net
>>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> AFRI-Discuss mailing list
>>>> AFRI-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss
>>>>
>>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.afralo.org
>>>>
>>>> Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to this
>>>> list are more accurate:
>>>> http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html#anexo1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Seun Ojedeji, Federal University Oye-Ekiti web:      *
>>>> *http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> **Mobile:
>>>> +2348035233535 <%2B2348035233535>*
>>>> *alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
>>>> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>>>>
>>>> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>    <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>>>>
>>>> Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant
>>>> parce que la protection Antivirus avast!
>>>> <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>>>> est active.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
>>> <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
>>> <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
>>> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>>>
>>> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> MATOGORO Jabhera
>> Assistant Lecturer & Coordinator - Microsoft Innovation Center, Tanzania
>> College of Informatics and Virtual Education
>> The University of Dodoma (www.udom.ac.tz)
>> _______________________________________________
>> AfrICANN mailing list
>> AfrICANN at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>
>
>
> --
> Douglas Onyango, PRINCE 2, ITILv3
> UG: +256 776 716 138



-- 
Douglas Onyango, PRINCE 2, ITILv3
UG: +256 776 716 138

More information about the AfrICANN mailing list