[AFRI-Discuss] [AfrICANN-discuss] Re: Joint meeting of African community in BUENOS AIRES"African views on the Proposal of the Governance of Internet uniqueidentifiers"

Douglas Onyango ondouglas at gmail.com
Tue Jun 23 14:51:00 UTC 2015 

All,
Someone has drawn my attention to some inaccuracies in the response
and proposal I posted.
I would like to withdraw my last contribution on this account. I will
review and repost if need be.

Regards,

On 23 June 2015 at 11:19, Douglas Onyango <ondouglas at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
> Sorry for the late response, but I have  once contribution regarding
> this paragraph.
>
> - The expected composition of PTI Board which is proposed to be
> sourced internally as determined by ICANN Board is acceptable. However
> we understand that the role of the  PTI Board would be minimal hence
> we expect that the selection of its members would be largely done in
> the public interests. We also hope that in the inclusion of 2 members
> of PTI Board to be  populated by the Nominating Committee, geographic
> diversity after competence is highly ensured in its selection process.
>
> I have an issue with our position here. My belief is that setting up
> PTI as a separate entity isn't perfunctory, but among other things, an
> attempt at segregation of duties between the policy making and
> implementation arm of the IANA function. Against this backdrop, I feel
> that having a PTI board constituted of many ICANN board members
> creates undue influence of the activities of the PTI, creates
> complacancy and leaves room for conflict of interest to arise. If this
> is an opinion shared by other people, I would like to offer the
> following text to articulate it.
>
>
> - Because we feel the creation of PTI, and its subsequent Board are to
> serve the object of segregation of duties between the policy making
> and implementation arm of the IANA function, among other things, we
> are concerned about the proposal to source the Board internally - as
> determined by ICANN Board.
> Whereas we understand that the role of PTI Board would be minimal, we
> still think an ICANN-lead PTI Board creates undue influence over the
> PTI, creates complacency and leaves room for conflict of interest to
> arise. We therefore urge that the proposal rethinks the composition of
> the PTI board or puts in place safe guards against the issues raised
> above. We expect that the selection of the PTI Board would be largely
> done in the public interests and that in the inclusion of 2 members of
> PTI Board by the Nominating Committee ensures geographic diversity and
> competency.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> On 22 June 2015 at 14:08, Matogoro Jabera <jaberamatogoro at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello Members,
>>
>> It happen that, the University of Dodoma, Tanzania hosted a remote hub
>> on ICANN53 and managed to ask a number questions on CWG and CCWG and
>> one of our main question was, regardless with the fact that Africa is
>> the second largest continents still it representation is NOT promising
>> as compared to other continent. The question was what lesson should we
>> get from this statistics? Panelist has answered it correctly and said
>> we still have a chance to participate more.
>>
>> Much appreciation to ICANN to recognize the role of Dk. Nii, it was
>> real pleasure to see this from Africa.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matogoro
>>
>> On 6/22/15, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello Tijani,
>>>
>>> Sure, we have actually indicated earlier (which was suggested by Muwendwa
>>> and supported by a number of people including myself) that statement for
>>> numbers/protocol can be sent in for incorporation. So we can add up
>>> Muwendwa's statement as the numbers part of the overall statement, although
>>> it would have been very helpful if it came earlier than now. Nevertheless
>>> its better late than never and i hope the community would review the
>>> statement provided by Muwendwa and suggest further edits accordingly.
>>>
>>> If anyone wants to write something about protocol parameters, it will be
>>> helpful as well. I believe there will still be room to edit this during the
>>> face 2 face meeting.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Tijani BENJEMAA
>>> <tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Seun,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Since we called our statement: “our views on the proposed future
>>>> governance of Internet Unique Identifiers”, we may add Mwendwa text and
>>>> modify the introduction to include the numbering function.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
>>>>
>>>> Executive Director
>>>>
>>>> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
>>>>
>>>> Phone:  + 216 41 649 605
>>>>
>>>> Mobile: + 216 98 330 114
>>>>
>>>> Fax:       + 216 70 853 376
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *De :* afri-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:
>>>> afri-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] *De la part de* Seun
>>>> Ojedeji
>>>> *Envoyé :* lundi 22 juin 2015 15:23
>>>> *À :* Mwendwa Kivuva
>>>> *Cc :* Afri-Discuss; AfrICANN list; Afrinic-discuss
>>>> *Objet :* Re: [AFRI-Discuss] [AfrICANN-discuss] Re: Joint meeting of
>>>> African community in BUENOS AIRES"African views on the Proposal of the
>>>> Governance of Internet uniqueidentifiers"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Muwendwa,
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Mwendwa Kivuva <
>>>> Kivuva at transworldafrica.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am still not in agreement with this statement:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  -       We observe that the CWG proposes to transfer IANA assets
>>>> including the IANA trademarks; we are in disagreement with this as we
>>>> will
>>>> prefer that the trademarks remain with the contractor post-transition
>>>> (which is ICANN). Nevertheless we suggest that the 3 operational
>>>> communities cordinate and agree on this. Our main interest is that
>>>> whoever
>>>> holds the trademark makes it available/accessible to the operational
>>>> communities as it is at the moment.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> First of all, does the CWG propose to transfer IANA assets?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here is a section of the proposal:
>>>>
>>>> A new, separate legal entity, Post-Transition IANA (PTI), will be formed
>>>> as an affiliate of ICANN. The existing IANA functions, administrative
>>>> staff, and *related* *resources*, processes, data, and know-how will be
>>>> legally transferred to PTI.
>>>>
>>>>  Trademark:
>>>>
>>>> [ICANN will grants PTI an* exclusive*, royalty-free, fully-paid,
>>>> worldwide license to use the IANA trademark and all related trademarks in
>>>> connection with PTI’s activities under the ICANN-PTI Contract.]
>>>>
>>>>   Full proposal ur: https://goo.gl/6UNbys
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Who is in disagreement with the transfer of the IANA assets?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually the statement is not to disagree with transfer of IANA assets
>>>> but
>>>> specifically transfer of IANA trademark. Nevertheless i think i agree
>>>> that
>>>> the current statement may be a little bit confusing, so i suggest the
>>>> following edit:
>>>>
>>>> "We observe that the CWG proposes to grant "exclusive" access of IANA
>>>> trademark to PTI; we are in disagreement with this as we will prefer that
>>>> the trademark remain with the contractor post-transition (which is ICANN)
>>>> as its an asset for the 3 operational communities. Nevertheless we
>>>> suggest
>>>> that the 3 operational communities coordinate and agree on this. Our main
>>>> interest is that whoever holds the trademark makes it
>>>> available/accessible
>>>> to the operational communities as it is at the moment."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  I have stated here that no feedback has come from the community whether
>>>> we agree or disagree on the transfer. I may be wrong, but any pointers
>>>> would be appreciated. However, I agree consensus between the three
>>>> operational communities is important.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Meanwhile, below is the statement I recommend we adopt on the numbers
>>>> community. I have produced this draft in my personal capacity. Any
>>>> feedback
>>>> is highly welcomed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please note that the statement we are currently working on attempts to
>>>> comment on the CWG proposal and CCWG proposal/report NOT the CRISP
>>>> proposal
>>>>
>>>> I hope that helps.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <begin text>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The number resource community has proposed an SLA with the IANA Function
>>>> Operator (IFO), a Review Committee to review the functions of IFO, and
>>>> transfer of the Intellectual Property related to the IANA functions  held
>>>> by ICANN to a neutral entity. The African community welcomes the view
>>>> from
>>>> the numbers community that the RIRs are "very satisfied with the
>>>> performance of ICANN in the role of the IANA Numbering Services Operator.
>>>> Taking this into account, and considering the Internet Number Community's
>>>> strong desire for stability and a minimum of operational change, the
>>>> Internet Number Community believes that ICANN should remain in the role
>>>> of
>>>> the IANA Numbering Services Operator for at least the initial term of the
>>>> new contract."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We also appreciate the fact that the numbering community chose
>>>>  arbitration over litigation in the unlikely event there are disputes
>>>> related to the execution of the IANA functions where mediation has
>>>> failed. Arbitration avoids hostility, is cheaper, faster, and more
>>>> flexible
>>>> than litigation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is the expectation of the AFRALO/AFRICANN community that the proposed
>>>> Review Committee is formed in an open and transparent manner, with
>>>> balanced
>>>> representation from the 5 RIRs and composed of members who are well
>>>> conversant with the operations of the RIRs and analytical enough to give
>>>> a
>>>> scorecard on the performance of the IFO.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is also the expectation of the AFRALO /AFRICANN community that the
>>>> three operational communities will reach consensus on the ownership and
>>>> use
>>>> of the iana.org domain name and the IANA trademark. It is our expectation
>>>> that any Intellectual Property held by ICANN related to the IANA
>>>> functions
>>>> is available in perpetuity to the three operation communities.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is important for the three operational communities to ensure the
>>>> proposals submitted to ICG are compatible to avoid protracted
>>>> negotiations
>>>> and back and forth with ICG because this may affect the timelines given.
>>>> Finally, It is the expectation of the Africa community that commitment is
>>>> shown by the three operational communities, and the ICG in ensuring that
>>>> the transition will happen on time, and timelines are adhered to.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <end text>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    ______________________
>>>> Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya
>>>>
>>>> "There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, till all men walk on
>>>> higher ground in that lifetime." - Maxwell Anderson
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21 June 2015 at 11:53, Ben Fuller <abutiben at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The Multistakeholder model is the best option we have to develop ICT's in
>>>> Africa. We have to get this transition right. .Na has been busy with the
>>>> CCWG and there are issues with both the outcome and the process.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The work and analysis everyone has put into the statement is impressive.
>>>> We need to keep it up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ben
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad Mini
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 21, 2015, at 03:43, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    Dear All,
>>>>
>>>> I have edited the version from Dave (which is an update on Beran's
>>>> version). I accepted most of Dave's edits but left some within the CCWG
>>>> section for Tijani to have further look as i think the membership
>>>> comments
>>>> was actually to indicate how problematic membership model can be and why
>>>> we
>>>> should not go that route.
>>>>
>>>> I have also added a few statement to reflect/cover Muwendwa's
>>>> suggestion/comment and i hope that will help
>>>>
>>>> Attached is the redline version
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Dave Kissoondoyal <dave at isoc-mu.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear Tijani,
>>>>
>>>> I have done some changes (changes are tracked in the document) and please
>>>> feel free to amend where necessary.
>>>>
>>>> Also instead of asking a question in the document, it is better to come
>>>> with
>>>> a recommendation.
>>>> I have modified the following to the paragraph below:
>>>>
>>>> •       The final aim of the CCWG work is to enhance the Accountability
>>>> to
>>>> the community . The membership model would enhance the accountability of
>>>> the
>>>> board to the ICANN members, but how do we ensure that the ICANN members
>>>> will
>>>> be accountable to the community???? With the membership model, we do not
>>>> solve it but instead move the accountability issue from the board to the
>>>> members
>>>>
>>>> •       The final aim of the CCWG work is to enhance the Accountability
>>>> to
>>>> the community in a transparent manner. The membership model would enhance
>>>> the accountability of the board to the ICANN members. With the membership
>>>> model, we do not solve the accountability problem but instead shift the
>>>> issue from the board to the members.
>>>> •       Therefore we recommend that checks and balances should be put in
>>>> place at the membership level to ensure that the members are accountable
>>>> to
>>>> the community.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks and best regards
>>>>
>>>> Dave Kissoondoyal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: afri-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>> [mailto:afri-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of
>>>> tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn
>>>> Sent: 20 June 2015 14:12
>>>> To: Beran Dondeh; tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn
>>>> Cc: Afri-Discuss; Alan Greenberg; AfrICANN List; Afrinic-discuss
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFRI-Discuss] Joint meeting of African community in BUENOS
>>>> AIRES"African views on the Proposal of the Governance of Internet
>>>> uniqueidentifiers"
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much Beran for your review. It is really helpful.
>>>>
>>>> I accepted almost all your language corrections except one that I found
>>>> not
>>>> too correct. Perhaps Seun can find with you the best text.
>>>>
>>>> As for your question about the word "un-interested", the meaning we
>>>> intent
>>>> was that it is done not for particular or private interest, but only for
>>>> the
>>>> public interest.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again
>>>>
>>>> Tijani
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On ven 19/06/15 11:43 , Beran Dondeh <berandondeh at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Dear Aziz, Tijani et al,
>>>> >
>>>> > Please find attached an edited version of the English Document with
>>>> > tracked changes. I would also like to slightly edit Tijani's suggested
>>>> > additions.
>>>> >
>>>> > • The final aim of the CCWG work is to enhance the Accountability to
>>>> > the community. The membership model would enhance the accountability
>>>> > of the board to the ICANN members, but how do we ensure that the ICANN
>>>> > members will be accountable to the community???? With the membership
>>>> > model, we do not solve it but instead move the accountability issue
>>>> > from the board to the members Thank you and regards
>>>> >
>>>> > Beran Gillen
>>>> >
>>>> > On Jun 19, 2015, at 9:02 PM, tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Dear Aziz and all,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > May I add a paragraph to the accountability part of our statement
>>>> > before the last bullet point in the following mannar:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > • All the accountability mechanisms should avoid leading to courts
>>>> > > as
>>>> > much as possible. In fact, we do not accept that ICANN affairs be
>>>> > managed by courts in whatever jurisdiction. ICANN is an example of a
>>>> > triving multistakeholder community and we should endeavor to protect
>>>> > that as much as possible.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Added paragraph:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > • The final aim of the CCWG work is to enhance the Accountability to
>>>> > the community. The membership model would enhance the
>>>> > > accountability of the board to the ICANN members, but how we can
>>>> > > ensure
>>>> > that the ICANN members will be accountable to the
>>>> > > community???? With the membership model, we move the accountability
>>>> > issue from the board to the members, but we do not solve
>>>> > > it.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > • The community group that will act on behalf of the respective
>>>> > community stakeholders to exercise the powers mentioned in the report
>>>> > should be as inclusive as possible. We prefer equal footing for all
>>>> > SOs and ACs, but can live with the composition proposed in the report.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Finally, we reiterate our support to the CWG-Stewardship and the
>>>> > CCWG-Accountability groups and appreciate the progress made so far.
>>>> > However, we think that their proposals need further work to find the
>>>> > right multi-stakeholder solution for the stewardship transition and
>>>> > the best ways to empower the community using the right means and
>>>> > avoiding ICANN the risk of being weakened or loose its independence,
>>>> > its inclusiveness and its multi-stakeholder nature.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Tijani
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On mer 17/06/15 8:54 , Aziz Hilali  wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >> [English]
>>>> > >> Dear colleagues,
>>>> > >> AFRALO will hold the traditional joint meeting AFRALO/AfrICANN
>>>> > >> during
>>>> > the
>>>> > >> ICANN meeting next week in Buenos Aires. The theme proposed by the
>>>> > members
>>>> > >> of AFRALO will be "African views on the Proposal of the Governance
>>>> > >> of Internet unique identifiers".
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> You will find attached the draft statement in English (French
>>>> > translation
>>>> > >> is in progress, it will be sent on the list tomorrow) of the joint
>>>> > >> AFRALO/AfrICANN meeting due to take place on Wednesday 24 June 2015.
>>>> > >> Would you please provide your comments on this draft before the end
>>>> > >> of Saturday, June 20,2015, to allow us to include them before
>>>> > >> printing
>>>> > the
>>>> > >> final version and then distribute it to the participants in the
>>>> > meeting for
>>>> > >> discussion, modification if any and adoption.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> [French]
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Chers collègues,
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> AFRALO organisera la traditionnelle réunion conjointe AFRALO /
>>>> > AfrICANN
>>>> > >> lors de la réunion de l'ICANN qui aura lieu la semaine prochaine à
>>>> > Buenos
>>>> > >> Aires. Le thème proposé par les membres d’AFRALO sera "Points de
>>>> > vue
>>>> > >> africains sur la proposition de la gouvernance du système des
>>>> > >> identificateurs uniques de l'Internet".
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> En fichier attaché, prière trouver le projet de déclaration (la
>>>> > >> traduction française est en cours de préparation et sera transmise
>>>> > sur la
>>>> > >> liste demain) de la réunion conjointe AFRALO – AfrICANN qui aura
>>>> > lieu à
>>>> > >> Buenos Aires le Mercredi 24 Juin 2015.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Je vous prie de donner vos remarques sur ce projet au plus tard le
>>>> > Samedi
>>>> > >> 20 Juin 2015, pour que l’on puisse les inclure avant d’imprimer la
>>>> > >> version finale et ensuite la distribuer aux participants à la
>>>> > réunion
>>>> > >> pour discussion, modification s’il y a lieu et adoption.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Best Regards
>>>> > >> Aziz Hilali
>>>> > >> AFRALO Chair _______________________________________________
>>>> > >> AFRI-Discuss mailing list
>>>> > >> AFRI-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>> > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss [1]
>>>> > >> [1]
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Homepage for the region: http://www.afralo.org [2] [2]
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to
>>>> > this
>>>> > >> list are more accurate:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.
>>>> > html
>>>> > [3]#
>>>> > >> anexo1[3]
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Links:
>>>> > >> ------
>>>> > >> [1]
>>>> > >>
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=https://atlarge-lists.ican
>>>> > n.org
>>>> > [4]
>>>> > >> /mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss[2]
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://www.afralo.org [5]
>>>> > >> [3]
>>>> > >>
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://www.funredes.org/mi
>>>> > stica
>>>> > [6]
>>>> > >> /english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html%23anexo1
>>>> > >>
>>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>>> > > AFRI-Discuss mailing list
>>>> > > AFRI-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss [7]
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Homepage for the region: http://www.afralo.org [8]
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to
>>>> > this list are more accurate:
>>>> > http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.
>>>> > html#
>>>> > anexo1[9]
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Links:
>>>> > ------
>>>> > [1]
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=https://atlarge-lists.ican
>>>>
>>>> > n.org /mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss[2]
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://www.afralo.org
>>>> > [3]
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://www.funredes.org/mi
>>>> > stica /english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html[4]
>>>> >
>>>> http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse
>>>> .
>>>> > php%3Fredirect%3Dhttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org[5]
>>>> >
>>>> http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse
>>>> .
>>>> > php%3Fredirect%3Dhttp://www.afralo.org[6]
>>>> >
>>>> http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse
>>>> .
>>>> > php%3Fredirect%3Dhttp://www.funredes.org/mistica[7]
>>>> <http://www.funredes.org/mistica%5B7%5D>
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=https://atlarge-lists.ican
>>>> > n.org /mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss[8]
>>>>
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://www.afralo.org
>>>> > [9]
>>>> > http://webmail.topnet.tn/parse.php?redirect=http://www.funredes.org/mi
>>>> > stica
>>>> > /english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html%23anexo1
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> AFRI-Discuss mailing list
>>>> AFRI-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss
>>>>
>>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.afralo.org
>>>>
>>>> Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to this
>>>> list are more accurate:
>>>> http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html#anexo1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Seun Ojedeji, Federal University Oye-Ekiti web:      *
>>>> *http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> **Mobile:
>>>> +2348035233535 <%2B2348035233535>*
>>>> *alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
>>>> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>>>>
>>>> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   <AFRALO-AfrICANN Statement_draft_v1.1_redine.doc>
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>> AfrICANN mailing list
>>>> AfrICANN at afrinic.net
>>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> AfrICANN mailing list
>>>> AfrICANN at afrinic.net
>>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> AFRI-Discuss mailing list
>>>> AFRI-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss
>>>>
>>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.afralo.org
>>>>
>>>> Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to this
>>>> list are more accurate:
>>>> http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html#anexo1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Seun Ojedeji, Federal University Oye-Ekiti web:      *
>>>> *http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> **Mobile:
>>>> +2348035233535 <%2B2348035233535>*
>>>> *alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
>>>> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>>>>
>>>> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>    <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>>>>
>>>> Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant
>>>> parce que la protection Antivirus avast!
>>>> <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>>>> est active.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
>>> <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
>>> <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
>>> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>>>
>>> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> MATOGORO Jabhera
>> Assistant Lecturer & Coordinator - Microsoft Innovation Center, Tanzania
>> College of Informatics and Virtual Education
>> The University of Dodoma (www.udom.ac.tz)
>> _______________________________________________
>> AfrICANN mailing list
>> AfrICANN at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>
>
>
> --
> Douglas Onyango, PRINCE 2, ITILv3
> UG: +256 776 716 138



-- 
Douglas Onyango, PRINCE 2, ITILv3
UG: +256 776 716 138

More information about the AfrICANN mailing list