[AFRI-Discuss] [AfrICANN-discuss] Theme for a Joint Meeting AFRALO/AfrICANN at ICANN 51

[ymshana2003]

Hi..
Knowing how these processes are carried out, I like few others in this agree with the Content of thr letter albeit too late now. .
A shot has been fired...
Cheers.  Yassin

Sent from Samsung Mobile

-------- Original message --------
From: Barrack Otieno <otieno.barrack at gmail.com> 
Date:30/08/2014  11:05  (GMT+02:00) 
To: AfrICANN list <africann at afrinic.net>,el at lisse.na 
Subject: Re: [AFRI-Discuss] [AfrICANN-discuss] Theme for a Joint Meeting	AFRALO/AfrICANN at ICANN 51 

Noted with thanks , i don't mean to water down the efforts of the different stakeholders, i was looking at it from a different angle that was hypothetical, that said i think Africa has something to offer some aspects of the transition touch on the ccTLD community making us interested parties in the IANA/NTIA transition and the least we can do is exchange views and give our opinion.

On Aug 30, 2014 9:44 AM, "Dr Eberhard W Lisse" <el at lisse.na> wrote:
This was written by parties that have or *ARE* invested in the ICANN
process, ie who have sxomething to loose from this power grab
attempt.

Even if the only interest one has is being a PDP terms like
"Analysis Paralysis" do not make sense, and there is ABSIOULTELY
NOTHING Africa-specific in the transtion, this process at least
should lend itself so well to our usual logorrhea.

You should not even wait until October to endorse this. I do.
And so does ALAC.

el

On 2014-08-30, 08:05 , Barrack Otieno wrote:
> Many thanks Dr. Fuller,
>
> I have looked at the text and there is a lot of sense in so far as
> the issues raised by the stakeholders are concerned, they are well
> thought out and articulated, i was just looking at it from another
> perspective.
>
> Thank you for the quick turnaround.
>
> Regards
>
> On 8/30/14, Ben Fuller <abutiben at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Barrack,
>>
>> Perhaps, but we should seriously consider joining all the other
>> communities.  Scroll down to the bottom of the article where the
>> full text of the joint letter sent to ICANN is posted.  We should
>> focus on that text.
>>
>> Ben
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Barrack Otieno
>> <otieno.barrack at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dr Fuller,
>>>
>>> You raise a very pertinent issue while i am in agreement with
>>> you, i also think we have to be wary of decisions that will over
>>> engineer decision making processes within ICANN since this could
>>> result in some analysis paralysis sort of scenario, what is your
>>> take?
>>>
>>> Just a thought.
>>>[...]
--
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/
_______________________________________________
AfrICANN mailing list
AfrICANN at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/africann/attachments/20140830/86ee6c06/attachment.htm