Search RPD Archives
[rpd] RDP Discussion
Taye Medoye
daniel.medoye at gmail.com
Thu Jul 23 09:42:09 UTC 2026
Dear All,
It's slightly frustrating to note that rather than concentrate discussions
on policy proposals in line with the Forum's expectations, towards arriving
at policy statements, interests and focus seem divided. I am not aware of
any clause in the Code of Conduct as articulated by the organisation, which
requires blatant and critical censure of opinions or positions by
participants, whether old or new.
I think the reference to both Tshepo and Gugu by Musa on their
contributions and where they belong, is highly offensive and indefensible.
When submissions are made on the platform, respondents are at liberty to
sift through and either align with, or object to issues raised, and with
alternative submissions. Besides, it's not proper to denigrate any
participant, or engage in some kind of profiling, which tends to supremacy.
I dare say that there is no mentee-participant. Every contributor's view
deserves to be treated with respect. We're certainly different in terms of
backgrounds, professions, experience, worldviews, etc, and these
contexts shape the way we relate with others.
It's refreshing to note that the intervention and clarifications by Mandla,
in terms of the AFRINIC policy development which allows new stakeholders to
engage, sets the record straight. Mandla's suggestion that the - approach
is to judge contributions on merit, relevance, and alignment AFRINIC's
mission and the needs of the network, suffices.
Finally, it's my humble opinion that participants. whether old or new on
the platform is reminded of the need to be intentionally familiar with the
Code of Conduct as enshrined for conducting affairs at the PDP and in other
engagements. No prejudices intended please!
Taye Medoye.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20260723/b9e02c92/attachment.html>
More information about the RPD
mailing list