Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Staff impact analysis

Frank Habicht geier at geier.ne.tz
Mon Jun 15 12:35:09 UTC 2026


Hi all,

I agree with what Jordi is saying here.

Any unnecessary delay will just delay the conclusion of this process.

Regards,
Frank

On 6/15/2026 2:15 PM, jordi.palet--- via RPD wrote:
> Hi Alain,
> 
> I see it in a different way. It has been a good practice in AFRINIC (and also same experience in other RIRs) to provide the impact analysis ASAP.
> 
> The impact analysis is key to understand possible implementation issues that the community discussion may or may not be able to discover.
> 
> If we get the impact analysis before the 1 week deadline for a new version, then “fixes” for those issues could be incorporated in a new version.
> 
> Otherwise, those fixes, which may even prevent the board to ratify a proposal even if it reaches consensus in the community, will need to wait for a complete new cycle (6 months or even 1 year).
> 
> So both, community discussion and impact analysis should be concurrent, because they may present different “views" of a proposal.
> 
> I fully understand that the number of proposals makes difficult for the staff to get all them in a perfect “final state" right now, but even just sharing a draft version in a PDF (no need to publish the draft in the web site), clearly stating that it is a draft and subjected to corrections, will be very helpful for both the discussion and the authors to be able to fix issues before the deadline.
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi
> 
> @jordipalet
> 
>> El 15 jun 2026, a las 12:16, ALAIN AINA via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> escribió:
>>
>> Dear PDWG,
>>
>> Would it not be more appropriate for the Working Group to first allow discussions to mature to a certain level of stability before the co‑chairs request an AFRINIC staff analysis?
>>
>> Section 3.4.1 of the CPM states that:
>> “the Working Group Chair(s) may request AFRINIC to provide an analysis (technical, financial, legal or other) of the impact of the draft policy proposal.”
>>
>> —Alain
>>
>>> On 15 Jun 2026, at 10:03, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Co-Chairs,
>>>
>>> I checked all the draft policy proposals at https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals and could not find stay impact analysis on them.
>>>
>>> Could you kindly have the policy liaisons look into this as ppm is right on our door step.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Sent from my mobile
>>> kindly excuse typos
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RPD mailing list
>>> RPD at afrinic.net
>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RPD mailing list
>> RPD at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd




More information about the RPD mailing list