Search RPD Archives
[rpd] AFRINIC PDWG Co-Chair Selection Candidates Matrix
abscoco at gmail.com
Fri May 20 20:17:39 UTC 2022
Hope this email finds you in good health!
Please see my comments below inline...
Le vendredi 20 mai 2022, Ish Sookun <ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu> a écrit :
> Hi Jordi,
> On 20 May 2022, at 13:53, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
> While the number of emails is significative, I was not looking into just
> counting them. Also, you will need to point how many each year, if they are
> related to specific proposals, and so many variables, that, as you very
> well said “Do read these emails …”.
> Yes, indeed. That is why I mentioned reading the emails. One should be
> able to draw his/her own conclusion.
Thanks for both your contribution & those of Jordi
+ Mike. Hi brothers :-)
...trying to summarize/reorganize, but not only ;-)
1| we actually know the various sources [1,2,3]
where to find the information related to individual
active participation within the PDWG. But it should
not be the responsibility of the PDWG to dig down
those sources on the first hand...but it's ok to double-check...if need
2| the PLT (Policy Liaison Team) must, by an
automated mean, provide URIs (from RPD/AC/RC
& PPM records), and small stats , showing the
activity (active participation) of each nominee;
within the PDWG, during the last two years.
3| it should be clearly stated to nominees that
PDP experience is required ;
4| allow the community to properly evaluate
5| the PDWG should find more ways to avoid eager
new participants aiming for a leadership position
before they have been actively involved through
6| each nominee should write its summary with
relevant information, in trying to satisfy the
selection criteria. That summary should contain, usefull references
regarding what it says about the nominee; for those who may want to know
about a given nominee .
7| a statement of support could add more relevant
information and references about the nominee.
8| quality of contribution is better than quantity;
but the PDWG needs more active participations :-)
9] it appears necessary to amend the actual selection criteria, but it is
important to consider
that (as noted by Jordi): those who apply for a
given position should make at least few extra
efforts to show/explain (with public available
references) why they think to be the best choice.
If only one nominee provides such relevant
information it's not its fault...we should actually
work with what we have.
: Sources include: Archive of the RPD mailinglist,
Recordings of the PPM, and more...
: for exemple the file containing all emails of the RPD during year 2021
is at the following URI:
: Video Recordings of previous PPMs need to
be classified into a meaningful playlist:
: Stats formated at the convenience of the Staff,
including the number of: DPP co-authored, single emails to RPD, threads to
: an amendment to the selection criteria
Excuses, if i missed some important contributions.
...and please just add it :-)
> Ish Sookun
> Systems Architect @ La Sentinelle Ltd
Best Regards !
baya.sylvain[AT cmNOG DOT cm]|<https://cmnog.cm/dokuwiki/Structure>
Subscribe to Mailing List: <https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/>
#LASAINTEBIBLE|#Romains15:33«Que LE #DIEU de #Paix soit avec vous
#MaPrière est que tu naisses de nouveau. #Chrétiennement
«Comme une biche soupire après des courants d’eau, ainsi mon âme soupire
après TOI, ô DIEU!»(#Psaumes42:2)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD