[rpd] AFPUB-2020-GEN-002-DRAFT04 - PDP Working Group (WG) Guidelines and Procedures (Draft-4)

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ]

Those are my objections on this proposal, as explained in the session:


3.3 the PDP is not just "guidelines" it is strict rules, it can't be subjected to interpretations and then we come into troubles. CPM is rules.

3.3.1 is very wrong to assign only one cochair to each policy. Both of them shall be co-leading it, so in case of one of them failure, the other one can follow without further delay

3.3.3 there is no determination of who can participate in consensus to elect chairs or voting if that's the case.

3.3.6. rejecting inputs is discriminatory. If someone was too busy to participate in part of the discussion, he/she has the right to come in at any time during the discussion. May have inputs that have not been considered before and in any case, he has the right to express opinion. That section must be completely deleted.

3.3.8. Is bad to have a mention to specific sections of the bylaws, they can change (they should in fact, they must not encroach the community and PDP).

3.3.9 Lack of consensus definition. Many folks don't read RFCs - there is no clear view of if the consensus is determined also in the mailing list discussion.

Lack of last-call definition

Lack of clear timings for all the process.


Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.