Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] [Community-Discuss] Call for AFRINIC’s registry service migration to other RIRs

Fernando Frediani fhfrediani at
Sun Aug 1 23:32:37 UTC 2021

How bad is to see this thing being said that 11.4 allows Board to adopt
by itself any policy they wish at any point without any prior discussion
in PDWG.

This is one of the most wrong things I have been seen here overtime,
simply because this "right" was NEVER gave by Community to to members to
do such thing, even in a urgent or most noble situation. This simply
does not and never existed.

It is not because of some member with a lot of imagination in the past
decided to push that to the bylaws that it is something valid because it
is currently written there.
Resources don't belong to members, as such only community can make such
concession to members and that has NEVER happened before in AfriNic history.

To those who still believe in that because it is convenient for them
moment, just try to accept and learn to deal with the rules and work in
passing a proper proposal following the due process, instead to force
soemthing artificially in the interest of a few.


On 01/08/2021 18:57, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:


> Hi Noah,


> Your interpretation on this is wrong.


> Read my detailed email a few days ago.


> 11.4 Allows the Board to define any policy regarding Internet

> Resources that they believe is urgently needed.


> This can be implemented ASAP the Board decides. The Board MUST also

> send the policy (11.5), as a policy proposal (because is the only way

> the PDWG works to reach consensus), to the PDWG for endorsement in the

> next meeting. If the PPM doesn’t endorse it, then the Policy will

> decay, but whatever happened meanwhile, will be “legal” in terms of

> the PDP.


> Now the question here is:


> 1. From past experience in the other RIRs, implementing such

> Inter-RIR policy, takes a minimum of 6 months, probably even more

> (it took 12 months in other RIRs), because there is a need to

> coordinate all the RIR systems. AFRINIC can’t “force” other RIRs

> to change their own agendas and workflows to address all the

> changes “faster”. AFRINIC could be lucky and because all the other

> 4 RIRs already passed by this several times, may be the process is

> so much “adjusted” and fine tunned that it may be faster.

> 2. I already suggested many times the Board to do that, when I saw

> that the consensus was not achievable. They ignored that. So I

> don’t think they want to pass this now, more when there are

> several proposals in discussion and could be discussed in a PPM in

> a couple of months from now, the AC reconstituted, and the appeals

> resolved, etc.

> 3. The Board can meanwhile, take measures so the implementation of a

> possible “system” for an Inter-RIR proposal is advanced, in hope

> that one way or the other a proposal reach consensus.

> 4. All that said, I expect that if the Board decides to draft that

> proposal/policy, they make sure that there is a clear statement

> that ensures that before any transfer, there is a confirmation of

> the resources being transferred are following the existing

> conditions in the RSA, CPM, etc., otherwise.


> Regards,


> Jordi


> @jordipalet


> On Mon, 2 Aug 2021, 00:06 Andrew Alston,

> <Andrew.Alston at

> <mailto:Andrew.Alston at>> wrote:


> This is incorrect and in line actually with what I said -


> Nop


> 1.Any policy adopted by the Board under the provisions of

> Article11.4 shall be submitted to the community for endorsement at

> the next public policy meeting.


> They adopt and submit to the PDWG.


> 1.In the event that such a policy submitted by the Board is not

> endorsed, the said policy shall not be enforced or implemented

> following its non-endorsement; however, any action taken in terms

> of the policy prior to such non-endorsement shall remain valid.


> AFRINIC Staff will only enforce or implement the adopted policy if and

> only if  "we the people" aka the powerful PDWG, endorse the said policy.


> So dude, the wordings are carefully written.


> 1. Board adopts,  PDWG endorse and finally Staff enforce/implements.


> Or


> 2. Board adopts, PDWG does not endorse, AFRINIC staff CAN NOT

> enforce/implement.


> Makes sense Andrew?


> The board can pass a policy - valid till the next policy meeting -

> and if the community doesn’t like it they can reverse it - in the

> mean time those who feel the threat is to great can move in the

> intervening period.


> Lol there is no **mean time dude**


> AFRINIC staff won't enforce or implement if "we the people" don't endorse.


> The board can - and does - have the power to implement policy

> valid till the next of wg


> The board does not have the power unless "we the people" endorse.


> Cheers


> Noah


> _______________________________________________ Community-Discuss

> mailing list Community-Discuss at




> **********************************************

> IPv4 is over

> Are you ready for the new Internet ?


> The IPv6 Company


> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged

> or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive

> use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty

> authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of

> this information, even if partially, including attached files, is

> strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you

> are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying,

> distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if

> partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be

> considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original

> sender to inform about this communication and delete it.



> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list