Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Last Call - RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned AFRINIC Address Space AFPUB-2019-GEN-006-DRAFT03.

Noah noah at neo.co.tz
Sat Jul 24 13:34:44 UTC 2021


Hi Ben

On Sat, 24 Jul 2021, 15:48 Ben Maddison, <benm at workonline.africa> wrote:

> Hi Noah,
>
> On 07/24, Noah wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > On Sat, 24 Jul 2021, 14:48 Ben Maddison via RPD, <rpd at afrinic.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Scenario B:
> > >     Same as scenario A + any existing ROAs for 154.73.32.0/22 are
> > >     deleted, and replaced with one having asID: 0.
> > >
> >
> > Precisely, however, the deletion is not automatic and ought to go
> through a
> > process.
> >
> > What would you envision to be the most realistic and reasonable process
> > since this has been left to the TAL manager to determine.?
> >
> If you are asking about the process for issuing AS0 ROAs for reclaimed
> resources (or previously allocated resources in general),


Oui...Ack.

I believe the
> only safe answer is "once consent has been given by the previous holder".
>

In which case, AFRINIC would have made sure that the de-registration from
the whois db of the said previous holder and the subsequent termination of
the RSA has already been completed through a reasonable process.


> This was the view I expressed originally, and recent events have
> convinced me that it is correct.


As things unfold seems to me that still absent the AS0 ROA policy, events
can still happen in case of dispute.

But for unallocated/unassigned bogons, it totally makes sense to mark them
with asid:0 at this point.

Cheers
Noah
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210724/717089df/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list