Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Last Call - RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned AFRINIC Address Space AFPUB-2019-GEN-006-DRAFT03.
noah at neo.co.tz
Sat Jul 24 13:34:44 UTC 2021
On Sat, 24 Jul 2021, 15:48 Ben Maddison, <benm at workonline.africa> wrote:
> Hi Noah,
> On 07/24, Noah wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> > On Sat, 24 Jul 2021, 14:48 Ben Maddison via RPD, <rpd at afrinic.net>
> > >
> > > Scenario B:
> > > Same as scenario A + any existing ROAs for 22.214.171.124/22 are
> > > deleted, and replaced with one having asID: 0.
> > >
> > Precisely, however, the deletion is not automatic and ought to go
> through a
> > process.
> > What would you envision to be the most realistic and reasonable process
> > since this has been left to the TAL manager to determine.?
> If you are asking about the process for issuing AS0 ROAs for reclaimed
> resources (or previously allocated resources in general),
I believe the
> only safe answer is "once consent has been given by the previous holder".
In which case, AFRINIC would have made sure that the de-registration from
the whois db of the said previous holder and the subsequent termination of
the RSA has already been completed through a reasonable process.
> This was the view I expressed originally, and recent events have
> convinced me that it is correct.
As things unfold seems to me that still absent the AS0 ROA policy, events
can still happen in case of dispute.
But for unallocated/unassigned bogons, it totally makes sense to mark them
with asid:0 at this point.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD