[rpd] Last Call - RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned AFRINIC Address Space AFPUB-2019-GEN-006-DRAFT03.

[Noah]

On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, 09:06 Owen DeLong, <owen at delong.com> wrote:


>

>

> On Jun 15, 2021, at 12:28 , Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:

>

>

> On Tue, 15 Jun 2021, 21:59 Job Snijders, <job at fastly.com> wrote:

>

>> Dear Noah, others,

>>

>

> Hi Job...

>

>

>>

>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 06:27:21PM +0300, Noah wrote:

>> > > The best measure to put in place to curb incidents is to not implement

>> > > this type of policy.

>> >

>> > There are several of us who support this policy for valid reasons, some

>> of

>> > which are founded on the premise [1] that you shared with the APNIC

>> region

>> > back in 2019.

>> >

>> > [1]

>> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/archive/2019/08/msg00065.html

>>

>> The point of that email was to show how SMALL the list of prefixes is! :-)

>> All this effort (and risk!) to 'punish' a few tens of routes in the

>> DFZ.

>>

>> In the email you reference, I asked whether anyone could support the

>> policy with actual data on network abuse. Nobody answered.

>

>

> So in the AFRINIC region, network abuse incidents have been reported on

> this very list as recent as this year and we have had incidents of

> misappropriation [1] of INR as well.

>

> [1]

> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/2020-August/003678.html

>

>

> Your example cites resources that were misappropriated in such a way that

> they could have had ROAs issued that would have further masked the

> misappropriation.

>


I read "further masked" ... eeeh heh ?

Noah
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210625/089babf2/attachment.html>