Search RPD Archives
[rpd] RPD Digest, Vol 175, Issue 153
Sunday Ayuba
sundayayuba8 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 21 21:32:11 UTC 2021
Dear Noah and Others,
It is quite funny that the king of Appeal are now afraid of an appeal. You
and I know fully well that we asked the Liasion Team to act as Chair and
they did a terrible job because they only took orders from Noah. Now you
are going back on that decision should I check the archives? In any case
you are contradicting yourself. For the sake of argument let us assume that
the decision was that of the WG. The same working group is now saying they
do not agree as they never took the decision, then it is never binding. Is
the WG that of Fernando and Noah?. Please allow the commitee to do thier
job and stop this usual attitude of yours. We have seen enough already.
Best regards,
Ayuba Sunday
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021, 8:16 PM <rpd-request at afrinic.net> wrote:
> Send RPD mailing list submissions to
> rpd at afrinic.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> rpd-request at afrinic.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> rpd-owner at afrinic.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: APPEAL AGAINST THE CONFIRMATION OF CONSENSUS DECLARED BY
> THE POLICY LIAISON TEAM AND THE BOARD ON THE SELECTION OF PDWG
> CO-CHAIRS (Fernando Frediani)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:16:16 -0300
> From: Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com>
> To: pdwg-appeal at afrinic.net, "rpd >> AfriNIC Resource Policy"
> <rpd at afrinic.net>
> Subject: Re: [rpd] APPEAL AGAINST THE CONFIRMATION OF CONSENSUS
> DECLARED BY THE POLICY LIAISON TEAM AND THE BOARD ON THE SELECTION
> OF
> PDWG CO-CHAIRS
> Message-ID: <cdf669a2-d616-fb4b-b761-b949c9f67c0c at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> Hello
>
> I think the Appeal is well written, however the appeal is directed
> against the Policy Liaison Team and the Board the CPM Section 3.5 only
> predicts appeals against the Co-Chais decisions. From CPM: "/A person
> who disagrees with the *actions taken by the Chair(s)* shall discuss the
> matter with the PDWG Chair(s) or with the PDWG/"
> I also don't see that the consensus was taken neither by the Policy
> Liaison Team or the Board of Directors, but by the PDWG itself in the
> lack of both Co-Chairs.
>
> Therefore I believe this Appeal is not applicable.
> Fernando
>
> On 21/04/2021 02:17, Emem William wrote:
> >
> > *Dear Appeal Committee,*
> >
> > Please check? the attachment for our appeal.
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > *
> > *
> >
> > *Subject : Appeal against the confirmation of consensus declared by
> > the Policy Liaison Team and the Board on the selection of PDWG Co-chairs*
> >
> > **
> >
> > Dear Appeal Committee,
> >
> > I am appealing against the confirmation of consensus declared by the
> > AFRINIC team and the Board on the selection of PDWG Co-chairs, made on
> > the RPD mailing list, on April 9^th and April 11^th .
> >
> > (https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/013018.html
> > <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/013018.html>)
> >
> > (https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/013052.html
> > <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/013052.html>)**
> >
> > I consider that the actions of the Board of Directors to self-declare
> > consensus over the PDWG matter in selecting the new co-chairs is done
> > outside of their scope of power and prerogatives.
> >
> > *Date of the appeal :*April 19^th , 2021
> >
> > *Date of the decision made by the Policy Liaison Team*
> >
> > (1) 3^rd April 2021
> >
> > (2) 9^th April 2021
> >
> > *Date of the decision made by the Board of Directors*
> >
> > 11^th April 2021
> >
> > *f) Reference to an announcement of decision which is being appealed*
> >
> > (1) 26^th March 2021, Eligibility criteria imposed by Policy Liaison Team
> >
> > (https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/012768.html
> > <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/012768.html>)
> >
> > (2) 9^th April 2021, Policy Liaison Team announced consensus is achieved
> >
> > (https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/013018.html
> > <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/013018.html>)
> >
> > (3) 11^th April 2021, Board Chair declared consensus
> >
> > (https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/013052.html
> > <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/013052.html>)
> >
> > *Name and email address of complainant.*
> >
> > Emem William
> >
> > dwizard65 at gmail.com <mailto:dwizard65 at gmail.com>
> >
> > **
> >
> > *Names of complainants.*
> >
> > 1.Olamide Andu (olamideandu at gmail.com <mailto:olamideandu at gmail.com>)
> >
> > 2.Yusuf Abdurahman Adebisi (adebc007 at gmail.com
> > <mailto:adebc007 at gmail.com>)
> >
> > 3.Emem Ekpo William (dwizard65 at gmail.com <mailto:dwizard65 at gmail.com>)
> >
> > 4.Sunday Ayuba (sundayayuba8 at gmail.com <mailto:sundayayuba8 at gmail.com>)
> >
> > The following appeal addresses the ?fake consensus on the selection of
> > the co-chairs? declaration, which according to the CPM, cannot be done
> > by anyone else besides the chair. Yes In this situation we agreed that
> > AFRINIC team should serve as secretariat but this team went ahead to
> > selectively implement decisions even when there was no consensus.
> > ??The board?s interference with the matter signifies that the bottom
> > up process no longer exists. Therefore, this appeal should serve the
> > Appeal Committee in taking into account a very important point, which
> > is the fact that the board has no right in declaring consensus.
> >
> > Based on the Board?s action ofdeclaring consensus on the selection of
> > the co-chairs, which is done outside of their prerogatives, it is safe
> > to conclude that the declaration of consensus is illegal as it is not
> > within the prescribed power and prerogatives of the Board of
> > Directors. The Board of Directors should have referred to and comply
> > with the stipulated terms of the AFRINIC?s constitution and the
> CPM
> > and ensure that any action that is taken by the Board of Directors is
> > done consistently and in compliance with the stipulated terms of the
> > AFRINIC?s Constitution and the CPM, which was not the case. The
>
> > declaration of the consensus by the Board of Directors shows that the
> > Board of Directors have acted above and beyond their prescribed power
> > and prerogatives.
> >
> > As for the list of requirements and qualifications imposed by the
> > Policy Liaison Team, It is vital to note that they were never
> > stipulated under the CPM. By simply adding on a list of requirement
> > and qualification proves that the Policy Liaison Team have acted
> > arbitrarily and with blatant disregard to the terms and procedures
> > which are clearly stipulated under the CPM.
> >
> > Based on the above, I urge the Appeal committee to look into this
> > serious matter and resolve this appeal by standing with what is right.
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Regards,
> > *Emem William*.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > RPD mailing list
> > RPD at afrinic.net
> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210421/e72ed718/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of RPD Digest, Vol 175, Issue 153
> *************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210421/276e13b9/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the RPD
mailing list