Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] PDWG Co-Chairs Selection pursuant to Section 3.3 of CPM - Status @ 9 April 2021

Mirriam mirriamlauren at
Sat Apr 10 09:57:09 UTC 2021

My brother Slyvain,
I am really happy that there is broad and diverse consensus from the community just like Seun and others have determined as a way forward. 
In a nutshell, there is good and health progress as a community which self organized to select very competent volunteers as it's Co-chairs.
Let's take this opportunity to now focus on discussing the pending DPPs.
Shalom Mirriam

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:19 PM, Sylvain Baya<abscoco at> wrote: Dear PDWG,

Le sam. 10 avr. 2021 08:44, Mirriam <mirriamlauren at> a écrit :

Hi Sylvain,
I couldn't agree more that indeed the WG has precisely exercised openly how rough consensus works.

Hi Mirriam,
Thanks for your email, sister!
...and you are free to disagree, though :-)
btw could you, please, present any evidence of your claim? could you, please, support your claim with some reasonable evidence? 
Could you, please, elaborate a bit?
...if your concern appears to be new; the PDWG will seize the opportunity to address it early...with the expectation to finaly reboot with the core activity: discussions around DPPs (Draft Policy Proposals).
...i usually refer to this [1] document to understand how rough consensus works.__[1]: <>
Hope this clarifies something!

On Saturday, April 10, 2021, 10:11:20 AM GMT+3, Sylvain Baya <abscoco at> wrote:

Dear PDWG,
Please find my comment below...

Le sam. 10 avr. 2021 07:21, Daniel Yakmut via RPD <rpd at> a écrit :


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list