[rpd] PDWG Co-Chairs Selection pursuant to Section 3.3 of CPM - Status @ 9 April 2021

[Mirriam]

My brother Slyvain,
I am really happy that there is broad and diverse consensus from the community just like Seun and others have determined as a way forward. 
In a nutshell, there is good and health progress as a community which self organized to select very competent volunteers as it's Co-chairs.
Let's take this opportunity to now focus on discussing the pending DPPs.
Shalom Mirriam

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:19 PM, Sylvain Baya<abscoco at gmail.com> wrote:   Dear PDWG,

Le sam. 10 avr. 2021 08:44, Mirriam <mirriamlauren at yahoo.com> a écrit :

 Hi Sylvain,
I couldn't agree more that indeed the WG has precisely exercised openly how rough consensus works.


Hi Mirriam,
Thanks for your email, sister!
...and you are free to disagree, though :-)
btw could you, please, present any evidence of your claim? could you, please, support your claim with some reasonable evidence? 
Could you, please, elaborate a bit?
...if your concern appears to be new; the PDWG will seize the opportunity to address it early...with the expectation to finaly reboot with the core activity: discussions around DPPs (Draft Policy Proposals).
...i usually refer to this [1] document to understand how rough consensus works.__[1]: <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7282>
Hope this clarifies something!
Shalom,--sb.



RegardsMirriam
     On Saturday, April 10, 2021, 10:11:20 AM GMT+3, Sylvain Baya <abscoco at gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 Dear PDWG,
Please find my comment below...

Le sam. 10 avr. 2021 07:21, Daniel Yakmut via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> a écrit :

  
[...]


  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210410/e7274380/attachment.html>