Search RPD Archives
[rpd] missing emails from co-chairs to board
Arnaud AMELINA
amelnaud at gmail.com
Sat Apr 10 08:07:10 UTC 2021
"""Voilà"""" Jordi c'est maintenant que tu t'exprimes correctement par
rapport à cette affaire. Au par avant, les mails envoyés au Board dans le
cadre du PDP, gardent en copie la liste PDP, une bonne habitude, même si
pas écrite dans les règles.
Arnaud
Le ven. 9 avr. 2021 à 06:53, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>
a écrit :
> Lesson learns from this:
>
> The PDP should enforce that the communications about the PDP process with
> the staff, board, etc., must be copied to the RPD list.
>
> So, nobody can "hide" documents, either one side or the other.
>
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
> @jordipalet
>
>
>
> El 9/4/21 7:42, "Frank Habicht" <geier at geier.ne.tz> escribió:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 09/04/2021 02:04, Owen DeLong via RPD wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Apr 8, 2021, at 02:05 , Eddy Kayihura <eddy at afrinic.net
> >> <mailto:eddy at afrinic.net>> wrote:
> >> ...
> >> A) Can the previous Co-chairs kindly forward the reports in
> >> question to the RPD list so that they are on public record?
> >> B) Once the new Co-chairs are in place, the PDWG agrees on how to
> >> move forward with the documents;
> >
> > Respectfully, I don’t agree with this. If it is shown that the
> co-chairs
> > took an action prior to their recall, then the board
> > should proceed as if the documents had been received at that time and
> > should act on them accordingly.
>
> Possibly Eddy wrote B) in the understanding that the condition in
> Owen's
> 2nd sentence ("it is shown that the co-chairs took an action prior to
> their recall") can't be true.
>
> It's really sad (my opinion) that there is not enough clarity [in the
> general public] about what was sent to the board. And I see it as
> difficult for the board (or CEO) to prove that they didn't receive
> anything.
>
> > There is no basis
> > for allowing the failure to receive the email to derail the process
> and
> > require that it be sent back as a result.
>
> *If* the board didn't receive [any] emails asking for ratification,
> then
> i'd say the process has not yet reached that stage yet where you see it
> derailing.
>
> But *if* any email asking for ratification has reached the board, then
> I
> agree that the board must act on it. Not necessarily in a board meeting
> 48 hours after the email, but at least in the next meeting from a time
> about a week after the email - i'd suggest.
>
> I agree with Eddy in case there was no email to the board.
> I agree with Owen's statements, including the "If".
>
> Regards,
> Frank
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210410/4c2c8ba2/attachment.html>
More information about the RPD
mailing list